Classification of hiatal hernias using dynamic three-dimensional reconstruction

Surgical Innovation

Volumn 13, Issue 1, 2006, Pages 49-52

  Kavic, Stephen M ^a   Segan, Ross D ^b   George, Ivan M ^a   Turner, Patricia L ^a   Roth, J Scoth ^a   Park, Adrian ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND   (United States)

^b TRIPLER ARMY MEDICAL CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

Classification; Computed tomography (CT); Hiatal hernia; Paraesophageal hernia

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; COMPUTER ASSISTED TOMOGRAPHY; COMPUTER GRAPHICS; COMPUTER MODEL; CONTROLLED STUDY; DIAGNOSTIC VALUE; DISEASE CLASSIFICATION; DYNAMICS; HIATUS HERNIA; IMAGE ANALYSIS; IMAGE DISPLAY; IMAGE PROCESSING; IMAGE RECONSTRUCTION; INFORMATION PROCESSING; SURGEON; THREE DIMENSIONAL IMAGING; VIRTUAL REALITY;

HERNIA, HIATAL; HUMANS; IMAGE PROCESSING, COMPUTER-ASSISTED; IMAGING, THREE-DIMENSIONAL; TOMOGRAPHY, X-RAY COMPUTED;

EID: 33744781272     PISSN: 15533506     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/155335060601300108     Document Type: Article

References (13)

1. Barrett NR. Hiatus hernia: a review of some controversial points. Br J Surg 42:231-43, 1954.
2. Ellis FH. Diaphragmatic hiatal hernias: recognizing and treating the major types. Postgrad Med 88:113-24, 1990.
3. Maish MS, DeMeester SR. Paraesophageal hiatal hernia. In Cameron JL, editor: Current Surgical Therapy, 8th edition. Philadelphia: Elsevier Mosby, 2004. pp 38-42.
4. Maziak DE, Todd TRJ, Pearson FG. Massive hiatus hernia: evaluation and surgical management. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg 115:43-62, 1998.
5. Ellis FH. Esophageal hiatal hernia. N Engl J Med 287:646-9, 1972.
6. Blamey S. Classifying hiatus hernia. Does it make a difference to management? Aust Fam Physician 27:481-5, 1998.
7. Vas W, Malpani AR, Singer J, et al. Computed tomographic evaluation of paraesophageal hernia. Gastrointest Radiol 14:291-4, 1989.
8. George I, Maley B, Stick J, et al. The use of CVAS in the first year and third year medical school. At: Society for Medical Innovation and Technology conference, 2002.
9. Mastrangelo MJ, Adrales G, McKinlay R, et al. Inclusion of 3-D computed tomography rendering and immersive VR in a third year medical student surgery curriculum. Stud Health Technol Inform 94:199-203, 2003.
10. Mastrangelo MJ, George I, Witzke W, et al. Improving the utility of medical imaging for educational, clinical and research applications via augmented and virtual reality. At: Minimally invasive surgery stereoscopic grand rounds, Oslo, Norway, 2002.
11. George I, Mastrangelo M, Hoskins J, et al. Using semi-automated image processing and desktop system to incorporate actual patient volumetric data in immersive surgical planning and viewing systems for multiple patients. In Westwood JD, Hoffman HM, Robb RA, Stredney D, editors:. Medicine Meets Virtual Reality 02/10. The Netherlands: IOS Press, 2002. pp. 155-9.
12. Mastrangelo M, Adrales G, George I, et al. Advancements in immersive VR as a tool for preoperative planning for laparoscopic surgery. In Westwood JD, Hoffman HM, Robb RA, Stredney D, editors: Medicine Meets Virtual Reality 02/10. The Netherlands: IOS Press, 2002. pp 274-9.
13. McKinlay R, Park A, Dunkle-Blatter S, et al. The use of 3-D reconstruction in difficult foregut surgery: a novel technique providing anatomical delineation with clinical application. J Soc Laparoendosc Surg 8:S28, 2004.