Human behavior models for agents in simulators and games: Part I: Enabling science with PMFserv

Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments

Volumn 15, Issue 2, 2006, Pages 139-162

  Silverman, Barry G ^a   Johns, Michael ^a   Cornwell, Jason ^a   O'Brien, Kevin ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 33744779374     PISSN: 10547460     EISSN: 15313263     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1162/pres.2006.15.2.139     Document Type: Article

References (61)

1. Anderson, J. R. (1990). The adaptive character of thought. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
2. Badler, N., Allbeck, J., Zhao, L., Byun, M. (2002). Representing and parameterizing human behavior. Proc. Computer Animation, 133-143.
3. Bates, J. 1992. Virtual reality, art, and entertainment. Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments, 1(1): 133-138.
4. Belavkin, R., Ritter, F., & Elliman, D. (1999). Towards including simple emotions in a cognitive architecture in order to fit children's behavior better. Proceedings of the 1999 Conference of the Cognitive Science Society. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
5. Bharathy, G. (2003). Physiology tank report, prepared for SYS 508, Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania. Available from the author at bharathy@seas.upenn.edu.
6. Bharathy, G. (2005). Modeling the behavior of synthetic human agents in virtual worlds. A systems methodology for carrying out knowledge engineering and modeling of cognitively detailed agents. Doctoral dissertation proposal, University of Pennsylvania, 2005. Available from the author at bharathy@seas.upenn.edu.
7. Bharathy, G., Chung, C. Y., Silverman, B. G., & Cornwell, J. (2002). PMF anthology addendum: Adrenaline, khat, exertion, injury, and trauma. Human Behavior Program, Defense Modeling and Simulation Office, Alexandria, VA. Available at http://www.seas.upenn.edu/barryg/PMF_AddendumI.doc.
8. Bharathy, G., Damghani, B., Kim, E., & Lambert, L. (2003). Design of agent-injury models. Prepared for SYS 508, Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania. Available from the author at bharathy@seas.upenn.edu.
9. Bjorkman, E., Barry, P., Tyler, J. (2001). Results of the common human behavior representation and interchange system (CHRIS) Workshop. In Simulation Interoperability Workshop, SISO.
10. Bradshaw, J. M., Greaves, M., Holmback, H., Karygiannis, T., Jansen, W., Silverman, B. G., et al. (1999). Agents for the masses? IEEE Intelligent Systems, 14(2), 53-63.
11. Buchanan, M. (2002). Nexus: Small worlds and the groundbreaking science of networks. New York: W. W. Norton.
12. Cederman, L.-E. (1997). Emergent actors: How states and nations develop and dissolve. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
13. Chong, R. S. (2004). Architectural explorations for modeling procedural skill decay. Proceedings of the Sixth International Conference on Cognitive Modeling, Pittsburgh, PA.
14. Cornwell, J., O'Brien, K., Silverman, B. G., & Toth, J. (2003). Affordance theory for improving the rapid generation, composability, and reusability of synthetic agents and objects. Proceedings of the Twelfth Conference on Behavior Representations in Modeling and Simulation (BRIMS, formerly CGF), SISO. 12-15 May 2003.
15. Cornwell, J. B., Silverman, B. G., O'Brien, K., & Johns, M. (2002). A demonstration of the PMF-extraction approach: Modeling the effects of sound on crowd behavior. Proceedings of the Eleventh Conference on Computer Generated Forces and Behavioral Representation, Orlando, Florida, 107-113.
16. Damasio, A. R. (1994). Descartes' error: Emotion, reason, and the human brain. New York: Avon.
17. Dobeck, E., Gadiraju, S., Mason, A. (2004). Spot the dog: Using PMFserv to develop petworld. ESE 608 Term Project, Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania.
18. Elliott, C. (1992). The affective reasoner: A process model of emotions in a multi-agent system. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Northwestern University, Evanston, Illinois.
19. Falcone, R., & Castelfranchi, C. (2004). Trust dynamics: How trust is influenced by direct experiences and by trust itself. Paper presented at the Third International Joint Conference on A utonomous Agents & Multi Agent Systems (AAMAS). New York.
20. Gibson, J. J. (1950). The perception of the visual world. Boston: Houghton-Mifflin.
21. Gibson, J. J. (1979). The ecological approach to visual perception. Boston: Houghton-Mifflin.
22. Gillis, P. D., & Hursh, S. R. (1999). Using behavior moderators to influence CGF command entity effectiveness and performance. Proceedings of the Eighth Conference on Computer Generated Forces and Behavioral Representation, Orlando, Florida, 237-251.
23. Gmytrasiewicz, P., & Lisetti, C. L. (2000). Using decision theory to formalize emotions in multi-agent systems. ICMAS 2000, 391-392.
24. Hammond, K. (2000). Judgments under stress. New York: Oxford Press.
25. Hayes-Roth, B. (1998). Animate characters. Autonomous Agents and Multi-Agent Systems, 1(2), 195-230.
26. Hendy, K. C., & Farrell, P. S. E. (1997). Implementing a model of human information processing in a task network simulation environment (Report No. DCIEM-97-R-71). Downsview, Ontario, Canada Defence Research & Development, Canada.
27. Horowitz, D. L. (2001). The deadly ethnic riot. Berkeley: University of California Press.
28. Hursh, S. R., & McNally, R. E. (1993). Modeling human performance to predict unit effectiveness. In D. Kamely, K. A. Bannister, & R. M. Sasmor (Eds.), Army science: The new frontiers: Military and civilian applications (pp. 309-328). Woodlands, TX: Borg Biomedical Services.
29. Janis, I. L., & Mann, L. (1977). Decision making: A psychological analysis of conflict, choice, and commitment. New York: The Free Press.
30. Johns, M. (2004). Deception and trust in semi-competitive environments. Doctoral dissertation proposal, University of Pennsylvania. Available from the author at mjohns@seas.upenn.edu.
31. Johns, M., & Silverman, B. G. (2001). How emotion and personality effect the utility of alternative decisions: A terrorist target selection case study. Proceedings of the Tenth Conference on Computer Generated Forces and Behavioral Representation, SISO. Norfolk, Virginia, 55-64.
32. Klein, G. A., Orasanu, J., Calderwood, R., & Zsambok, C. E. (1993). Decision making in action: Models and methods. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.
33. Labrou, Y., Finin, T., & Peng, Y. (1999). Agent communication languages: The current landscape. IEEE Intelligent Systems and Their Applications, 14(2), 45-52.
34. Laird, J., & van Lent, M. (2001). Human-level AI's killer application. AI Magazine, Summer, 15-25.
35. Lazarus, R. (1991). Emotion and adaptation. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
36. Lombarde, J., Pollack, B., George, M., & Brounstein, A. (2003). Modeling human behavior within the "Black Hawk Down" scenario. Senior Design Project Report, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia.
37. Lustick, I. S. (2002). PS-I: A user-friendly agent-based modeling platform for testing theories of political identity and political stability. Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulations, 5(3).
38. McPhail, C., & Wohlstein, R. T. (1983). Individual and collective behaviors within gatherings, demonstrations, and riots. Annual Review of Sociology, 9, 579-600.
39. Ness, J., Ritzer, D., & Tepe, V. (eds.), (2005). The science and simulation of human performance. New York: Elsevier.
40. Ortony, A., Clore, G. L., & Collins, A. (1988). The cognitive structure of emotions. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
41. Payr, S., & Trappl, R. (2004). Agent culture: Human-agent interaction in a multicultural world. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
42. Reeves, B., & Nass, C. (1996). The media equation: How people treat computers, televisions, and new media like real people and places. New York: Cambridge University Press.
43. Ritter, F., Avraamides, M. N., & Councill, I. G. (2003). Validating changes to a cognitive architecture to more accurately model the effects of two example behavior moderators. Proceedings of the Eleventh Conference on Behavior Representation in Modeling and Simulation, SISO. Orlando.
44. Roseman, I., Spindel, M. S., & Jose, P. E. (1990). Appraisals of emotion-eliciting events: Testing a theory of discrete emotions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59(5), 899-913.
45. Silverman, B. G. (1991). Expert critics: Operationalizing the judgment/decision making literature as a theory of "bugs" and repair strategies. Knowledge Acquisition, 3, 175-214.
46. Silverman, B. G., Bharathy, G. (2005). Modeling cognition and personality in leaders. Proceedings of the Thirteenth Conference on Behavioral Representations in Modeling and Simulation, SISO.
47. Silverman, B. G., Johns, M., & Bharathy, G. (2004). Agent-Based Simulation of Leaders. ACASA/UPenn, Tech Report.
48. Silverman, B. G., Johns, M., O'Brien, K., Weaver, R., & Cornwell, J. (2002). Constructing virtual asymmetric opponents from data and models in the literature: Case of crowd rioting. Proceedings of the Eleventh Conference on Computer Generated Forces and Behavioral Representation, Orlando, Florida, 97-106.
49. Silverman, B. G., Johns, M., Shin, H., & Weaver, R. (2002). Performance moderator function (PMF) anthology for human behavior modeling in military simulations. Human Behavior Program, Defense Modeling and Simulation Office, Alexandria, VA. Available at www.seas.upenn.edu/barryg/PMFset.zip.
50. Silverman, B. G., Johns, M., Weaver, R., O'Brien, K., & Silverman, R. (2002). Human behavior models for gametheoretic agents. Cognitive Science Quarterly, 2 (3-4), 273-301.
51. Silverman, B. G., Might, R., Dubois, R., Shin, H., Johns, M., & Weaver, R. (2001). Toward a human behavior models anthology for synthetic agent development. Proceedings of the Tenth Conference on Computer Generated Forces and Behavioral Representation. Norfolk, Virginia, 277-285.
52. Silverman, B. G., Rees, R., Toth, J., Cornwell, J., O'Brien, K., Johns, M., et al. (2005). Athena's prism - A diplomatic strategy role playing simulation for generating ideas and exploring alternatives. Proceedings of the First International Conference on Intelligence Analysis, MacLean, Virginia: MITRE.
53. Simari, G. I., & Parsons, S. (2004). On approximating the best decision for an autonomous agent. Paper presented at the Third International Joint Conference on Autonomous Agents & Multi Agent Systems (AAMAS), W16: Workshop on Game Theory and Decision Theory. New York.
54. Sloman, A., & Logan, B. (1999). Building cognitively rich agents using the SIM_AGENT toolkit. Communications of the ACM, 42(3), 71-77.
55. Tambe, M., Johnson, W. L., Jones, R. M., Koss, F., Laird, J. E., Rosenbloom, P. S., et al. (1995). Intelligent agents for interactive simulation environments. AI Magazine, 75(1), 15-39.
56. Terzopoulos, D. (1999). Artificial life for computer graphics. Communications of the ACM, 42(8), 33-42.
57. Toth, J. A. (1995). Book review of Reasoning agents in a dynamic world: The frame problem (K. M. Ford and P. J. Hayes, Eds.). Artificial Intelligence, 73: 323-369.
58. Weaver, R., Silverman, B. G., Shin, H., & Dubois, R. (2001). Modeling and simulating terrorist decision-making: A "performance moderator function" approach to generating virtual opponents. Proceedings of the Tenth Conference on Computer Generated Forces and Behavioral Representation, Norfolk, Virginia, 39-44.
59. Wohl, J. (1981). Force management decision requirements for Air Force tactical command and control. IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, 11(9).
60. Yerkes, R. W., & Dodson, J. D. (1908). The relation of strength of stimulus to rapidity of habit-formation. Journal of Comparative Neurology and Psychology, 18, 459-482.
61. Zachary, W., Santarelli, T., Ryder, J., Stokes, J., & Scolaro, D. (2001). Developing a multi-tasking cognitive agent using the COGNET/iGEN integrative architecture. Proceedings of the Tenth Conference on Computer Generated Forces and Behavioral Representation, SISO, Norfolk, Virginia, 79-90.