Which solar neutrino experiment after kamland and borexino?

Journal of High Energy Physics

Volumn 5, Issue 11, 2001, Pages 1-25

  Strumia, Alessandro ^a   Vissani, Francesco ^b  

^a CERN   (Switzerland)

^b LABORATORI NAZIONALI DEL GRAN SASSO   (Italy)

Author keywords

Neutrino and Gamma Astronomy; Neutrino Physics; Standard Model

Indexed keywords

EID: 33744754127     PISSN: 10298479     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1088/1126-6708/2001/11/048     Document Type: Article

References (87)

1. The results of the Homestake experiment are reported in B.T. Cleveland et al., Measurement of the solar electron neutrino flux with the Homestake Chlorine detector, Astrophys. J. 496 (1998) 505.
2. Kamiokande collaboration, Solar neutrino data covering solar cycle 22, Phys. Rev. Lett. 77 (1996) 1683.
3. Gallex collaboration, Gallex solar neutrino observations: results for Gallex IV, Phys. Lett. B 447 (1999) 127
4. SAGE collaboration, Phys. Rev. C 60 (1999) 055801.
5. 8 B and hep neutrino measurements from 1258 days of Super-Kamiokande data, Phys. Rev. Lett. 86 (2001) 5651 [hep-ex/0103032] (Its published version does not contain table III, which gives the real data employed in out fit);
6. See also Constraints on neutrino oscillations using 1258 days of Super-Kamiokande solar neutrino data, Phys. Rev. Lett. 86 (2001) 5656 [hep-ex/0103033].
7. GNO collaboration, GNO solar neutrino observations: results for GNO I, Phys. Lett. B 490 (2000) 16.
8. 8 B solar neutrinos at the Sudbury neutrino observatory, Phys. Rev. Lett. 87 (2001) 071301 [nucl-ex/0106015].
9. K. Inoue (for the KamLAND collaboration), Proposal for USA participation in Kam-LAND, talk at Solar neutrinos: where are the oscillations?, Gran Sasso conference, 12–14 March 2001, p. 429, available at http://kamland.lbl.gov.
10. The Borexino web page http://almime.mi.infn.it/html/borexinof.html; See also B. Caccianiga (for the Borexino collaboration), talk at the Vanderbilt conference, 5–10 March 2001.
11. For an updated review, see the talk of S. Schönert at TAUP 2001 Solar and reactor neutrinos: upcoming experiments and future projects, LNGS, 8–12 Sept. 2001, web page http://taup2001.lngs.infn.it/.
12. J.M. Williams, Asymmetric collision of concepts: why eigenstates alone are not enough for neutrino flavor oscillations, physics/0007078.
13. Super-Kamiokande collaboration, S. Fukuda et al., Tau neutrinos favored over sterile neutrinos in atmospheric muon neutrino oscillations, Phys. Rev. Lett. 85 (2000) 3999 [hep-ex/0009001].
14. MACRO collaboration, M. Ambrosio et al., Matter effects in upward-going muons and sterile neutrino oscillations, Phys. Lett. B 517 (2001) 59 [hep-ex/0106049];
15. th ICRC, Hamburg, Aug 7–15, 2001.
16. Bugey collaboration, Search for neutrino oscillations at 15-meters, 40-meters, and 95-meters from a nuclear power reactor at Bugey, Nucl. Phys. B 434 (1995) 503.
17. CHOOZ collaboration, M. Apollonio et al., Limits on neutrino oscillations from the Chooz experiment, Phys. Lett. B 466 (1999) 415 [hep-ex/9907037];
18. see also Palo Verde collaboration, F. Boehm et al., Search for neutrino oscillations at the Palo Verde nuclear reactors, Phys. Rev. Lett. 84 (2000) 3764 [hep-ex/9912050];
19. For a review on reactor experiments, see C. Bemporad, G. Gratta and P. Vogel, Reactor-based neutrino oscillation experiments, hep-ph/0107277.
20. KARMEN collaboration, K. Eitel, Latest results of the Karmen2 experiment, Nucl. Phys. 91 (Proc. Suppl.) (2000) 191 [hep-ex/0008002].
21. µ beam, Phys. Rev. D 64 (2001) 112007 [hep-ex/0104049].
22. For three-flavour analyses of solar and atmospheric data made obsolete by the CHOOZ data see e.g. G.L. Fogli, E. Lisi and D. Montanino, A consistent three flavor approach to possible evidence of neutrino oscillations, Astropart. Phys. 4 (1995) 177;
23. R. Barbieri, L.J. Hall, D.R. Smith, A. Strumia and N. Weiner, Oscillations of solar and atmospheric neutrinos, J. High Energy Phys. 12 (1998) 017 [hep-ph/9807235].
24. G.L. Fogli, E. Lisi, D. Montanino and A. Palazzo, Model-dependent and independent implications of the first Sudbury neutrino observatory results, Phys. Rev. D 64 (2001) 093007 [hep-ph/0106247];
25. J.N. Bahcall, M.C. Gonzalez-Garcia and C. Peña-Garay, Global analysis of solar neutrino oscillations including SNO CC measurement, J. High Energy Phys. 08 (2001) 014 [hep-ph/0106258];
26. A. Bandyopadhyay, S. Choubey, S. Goswami and K. Kar, Impact of the first SNO results on neutrino mass and mixing, Phys. Lett. B 519 (2001) 83 [hep-ph/0106264];
27. P.I. Krastev and A.Y. Smirnov, Global analysis with SNO: toward the solution of the solar neutrino problem, hep-ph/0108177.
28. P. Creminelli, G. Signorelli and A. Strumia, Frequentist analyses of solar neutrino data, J. High Energy Phys. 05 (2001) 052 [hep-ph/0102234].
29. R. Barbieri and A. Strumia, Non standard analysis of the solar neutrino anomaly, J. High Energy Phys. 12 (2000) 016 [hep-ph/0011307].
30. J.N. Bahcall, Gallium solar neutrino experiments: absorption cross sections, neutrino spectra and predicted event rates, Phys. Rev. D 56 (1997) 3391 [hep-ph/9710491].
31. 2, J. High Energy Phys. 04 (1999) 026 [hep-ph/9904245];
32. For post-SNO analyses of energy-independent solutions see [20] and S. Choubey, S. Goswami and D.P. Roy, Energy independent solution to the solar neutrino anomaly including the SNO data, hep-ph/0109017.
33. For historical record, EI oscillations are the first solution suggested for the solar neutrinos (before the MSW effect was discovered);
34. B. Pontecorvo, Neutrino experiments and the problem of conservation of leptonic charge, Sov. Phys. JETP 26 (1968) 984;
35. V.N. Gribov and B. Pontecorvo, Neutrino astronomy and lepton charge, Phys. Lett. B 28 (1969) 493.
36. V.D. Barger, D. Marfatia and B.P. Wood, Resolving the solar neutrino problem with Kamland, Phys. Lett. B 498 (2001) 53 [hep-ph/0011251].
37. H. Murayama and A. Pierce, Energy spectra of reactor neutrinos at KamLAND, hep-ph/0012075.
38. A. de Gouvêa and C. Peña-Garay, Solving the solar neutrino puzzle with KamLAND and solar data, Phys. Rev. D 64 (2001) 113011 [hep-ph/0107186].
39. See e.g. J. Burguet-Castell, M.B. Gavela, J.J. Gomez-Cadenas, P. Hernandez and O. Mena, On the measurement of leptonic CP-violation, Nucl. Phys. B 608 (2001) 301 [hep-ph/0103258].
40. J.N. Bahcall, Solar neutrinos, 1. Theoretical, Phys. Rev. Lett. 12 (1964) 300.
41. See e.g. A. Palazzo, Testing large mixing MSW solutions of the solar neutrino problem through earth regeneration effects, Nucl. Phys. 100 (Proc. Suppl.) (2001) 55 [hep-ph/0103027], and references therein.
42. 7 Be solar neutrino experiments, J. High Energy Phys. 03 (2001) 009 [hep-ph/9910286].
43. J.N. Bahcall, M.H. Pinsonneault and S. Basu, Solar models: current epoch and time dependences, neutrinos and helioseismological properties, Astrophys. J. 555 (2001) 990 [astro-ph/0010346], and references therein;
44. See also S. Turck-Chieze, Review of solar models and helioseismology, Nucl. Phys. 91 (Proc. Suppl.) (2001) 73.
45. S. Pakvasa and J. Pantaleone, Direct probes of neutrino properties using solar neutrino lines, Phys. Rev. Lett. 65 (1990) 2479;
46. P.I. Krastev and S.T. Petcov, Testing the vacuum oscillation and the MSW solutions of the solar neutrino problem, Nucl. Phys. B 449 (1995) 605 [hep-ph/9408234];
47. 7 Be solar neutrino flux, Phys. Rev. D 60 (1999) 093011 [hep-ph/9904399].
48. 2 through time variations of event rates in GNO and Borexino, Phys. Rev. D 61 (2000) 073009 [hep-ph/9910387].
49. P.I. Krastev and S.T. Petcov, On the analytic description of two neutrino transitions of solar neutrinos in the sun, Phys. Lett. B 207 (1988) 64, erratum ibid. 214 (1988) 661;
50. The smearing due to the energy spread of the beryllium ‘line’ was discussed in S.T. Petcov, The effects of averaging on the matter enhanced oscillations of solar neutrinos, Phys. Lett. B 224 (1989) 426;
51. For recent useful studies of matter effects in the QVO region see G.L. Fogli, E. Lisi, D. Montanino and A. Palazzo, Quasi-vacuum solar neutrino oscillations, Phys. Rev. D 62 (2000) 113004 [hep-ph/0005261];
52. E. Lisi, A. Marrone, D. Montanino, A. Palazzo and S.T. Petcov, Analytical description of quasi-vacuum oscillations of solar neutrinos, Phys. Rev. D 63 (2001) 093002 [hep-ph/0011306] and references therein.
53. B. Faïd, G.L. Fogli, E. Lisi and D. Montanino, Vacuum oscillations and variations of solar neutrino rates in Super-Kamiokande and Borexino, Astropart. Phys. 10 (1999) 93 [hep-ph/9805293].
54. 7 Be solar neutrino line: a reflection of the central temperature distribution of the sun, Phys. Rev. D 49 (1994) 3923.
55. S. Wänninger et al., Probing neutrino vacuum oscillations with the Gallex solar neutrino results, Phys. Rev. Lett. 83 (1999) 1088;
56. SAGE collaboration, Measurement of the solar neutrino capture rate by SAGE and implications for neutrino oscillations in vacuum, Phys. Rev. Lett. 83 (1999) 4686 [astro-ph/9907131];
57. These bounds could be recomputed taking into account solar matter effects, the finite width of the Be line, and extended to θ > π/4
58. First analytical formulae were obtained in S. Parke, Nonadiabatic level crossing in resonant neutrino oscillations, Phys. Rev. Lett. 57 (1986) 1275;
59. P. Pizzochero, Nonadiabatic level crossing in neutrino oscillations for an exponential solar density profile, Phys. Rev. D 36 (1987) 2293;
60. The double exponential (particularly relevant in the QVO region) was found in S.T.
61. Petcov, Exact analytic description of two neutrino oscillations in matter with exponentially varying density, Phys. Lett. B 200 (1988) 373;
62. For a review see T.K. Kuo and J. Pantaleone, Neutrino oscillations in matter, Rev. Mod. Phys. 61 (1989) 937.
63. P.I. Krastev and S.T. Petcov, On the vacuum oscillation solution of the solar neutrino problem, Phys. Rev. D 53 (1996) 1665 [hep-ph/9510367].
64. B. Ricci and F.L. Villante, Helioseismic determination of beryllium neutrinos produced in the sun, Phys. Lett. B 488 (2000) 123 [astro-ph/0005538].
65. 7 Be target, Phys. Lett. B 462 (1999) 237.
66. 8 B cross section, Phys. Rev. Lett. 86 (2001) 3985 [nucl-ex/0101014].
67. M.C. Gonzalez-Garcia, M. Maltoni and C. Peña-Garay, Solar and atmospheric four-neutrino oscillations, Phys. Rev. D 64 (2001) 093001 [hep-ph/0105269];
68. 2 for solar SK data;
69. �A simplified analysis was performed in V.D. Barger, D. Marfatia and K. Whisnant, Unknowns after the SNO charged-current measurement, hep-ph/0106207;
70. 2 = 1 (in gaussian approximation)
71. W. Grimus and T. Schwetz, 4-neutrino mass schemes and the likelihood of (3+1)-mass spectra, Eur. Phys. J. C 20 (2001) 1 [hep-ph/0102252];
72. �M. Maltoni, T. Schwetz and J.W.F. Valle, Cornering (3+1) sterile neutrino schemes, Phys. Lett. B 518 (2001) 252 [hep-ph/0107150].
73. F. Vissani and A.Y. Smirnov, Neutral-to-charged current events ratio in atmospheric neutrinos and neutrino oscillations, Phys. Lett. B 432 (1998) 376 [hep-ph/9710565].
74. 7 Be solar neutrinos, hep-ph/0106339.
75. B. Jegerlehner, F. Neubig and G. Raffelt, Neutrino oscillations and the supernova 1987A signal, Phys. Rev. D 54 (1996) 1194 [astro-ph/9601111].
76. L. Wolfenstein, Neutrino oscillations in matter, Phys. Rev. D 17 (1978) 2369;
77. S.P. Mikheyev and A. Yu Smirnov, Resonance amplification of oscillations in matter and spectroscopy of solar neutrinos, Sov. J. Nucl. Phys. 42 (1986) 913.
78. J.N. Bahcall, http:www.sns.ias.edu/~jnb.
79. A.M. Dziewonski and D.L. Anderson, Preliminary reference Earth model, Phys. Earth Planet. Interior 25 (1981) 297.
80. M.C. Gonzalez-Garcia, P.C. de Holanda, C. Peña-Garay and J.W.F. Valle, Status of the MSW solutions of the solar neutrino problem, Nucl. Phys. B 573 (2000) 3 [hep-ph/9906469].
81. F.J. Kelly and H. Uberall, Absorption of solar neutrinos in deuterium, Phys. Rev. Lett. 16 (1966) 145;
82. Yu.S. Kopysov and V.A. Kuz’min, Disintegration of a deuteron by a neutrino, Sov. J. Nucl. Phys. 4 (1967) 740;
83. S.D. Ellis and J.N. Bahcall, Neutrino absorption by deuterium, Nucl. Phys. A 114 (1968) 636;
84. S. Ying et al., Charged and neutral current solar neutrino cross-sections for heavy water Čerenkov detectors, Phys. Rev. C 45 (1992) 1982;
85. J.N. Bahcall and E. Lisi, Tests of electron flavor conservation with the Sudbury neutrino observatory, Phys. Rev. D 54 (1996) 5417 [hep-ph/9607433].
86. J.N. Bahcall and E. Lisi, Tests of electron flavor conservation with the Sudbury neutrino observatory, Phys. Rev. D 54 (1996) 5417 [hep-ph/9607433].
87. M. Passera, QED corrections to neutrino electron scattering, Phys. Rev. D 64 (2001) 113002 [hep-ph/0011190].