Inpatient rehabilitation outcomes in primary and revision total knee arthroplasty patients

Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research

Volumn 446, Issue , 2006, Pages 201-207

  Vincent, Kevin R ^a,b   Vincent, Heather K ^a   Lee, Laura W ^a   Alfano, Alan P ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA HEALTH SYSTEM   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; CONFERENCE PAPER; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEMALE; HOME; HOSPITAL COST; HOSPITAL DISCHARGE; HOSPITAL PATIENT; HUMAN; LENGTH OF STAY; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; OUTCOME ASSESSMENT; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PRODUCTIVITY; SCORING SYSTEM; TOTAL KNEE REPLACEMENT; ARTICLE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONTRACTURE; FOLLOW UP; JOINT CHARACTERISTICS AND FUNCTIONS; KNEE; KNEE ARTHROPLASTY; PATHOPHYSIOLOGY; REOPERATION; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

AGED; ARTHROPLASTY, REPLACEMENT, KNEE; CONTRACTURE; FEMALE; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; HUMANS; INPATIENTS; KNEE JOINT; MALE; RANGE OF MOTION, ARTICULAR; REOPERATION; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 33744754048     PISSN: 0009921X     EISSN: 15281132     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/01.blo.0000214435.72398.0e     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (13)

1. Aitken DM, Bohannon RW. Functional independence measure versus short form-36: relative responsiveness and validity. Int J Rehabil Res. 2001;24:65-68.
2. Callahan CM, Drake BG, Heck DA. Patient outcomes following tricompartmental total knee replacement. JAMA. 1994;271:1349-1357.
3. Chen CC, Heinemann AW, Granger CV, Linn RT. Functional gains and therapy intensity during subacute rehabilitation: a study of 20 facilities. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2002;83:1514-1523.
4. Dodds TA, Martin DP, Stolov WC, Deyo RA. A validation of the functional independence measurement and its performance among rehabilitation inpatients. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1993;74:531-536.
5. Forrest G, Fuchs M, Gutierrez A, Girardy J. Factors affecting length of stay and need for rehabilitation after hip and knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty. 1998;13:186-190.
6. Forrest GP, Roque JM, Dawodu ST. Decreasing length of stay after total joint arthroplasty: effect on referrals to rehabilitation units. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1999;80:192-194.
7. Frosch P, Decking J, Theis C, Drees P, Schoellner C, Eckardt A. Complications after total knee arthroplasty: a comprehensive report. Acta Orthop Belg. 2004;70:565-569.
8. Gioe TJ, Killeen KK, Grimm K, Mehle S, Scheltema K. Why are total knee replacements revised?: analysis of early revision in a community knee implant registry. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2004;428:100-106.
9. Grissom SP, Dunagan L. Improved satisfaction during inpatient rehabilitation after hip and knee arthroplasty. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2001;80:798-803.
10. Licciardone JC, Stoll ST, Cardarelli KM, Gamber RG, Swift JN Jr, Winn WB. A randomized controlled trial of osteopathic manipulative treatment following knee or hip arthroplasty. J Am Osteopath Assoc. 2004;104:193-202.
11. Mendenhall S. Hip and knee implant review. Ortho Net News. 2003;14:1-3.
12. Munin MC, Rudy TE, Glynn NW, Crossett LS, Rubash HE. Early inpatient rehabilitation after elective hip and knee arthroplasty. JAMA. 1998;279:847-852.
13. Weingarten S, Reidinger M, Conner L. Hip replacement and hip hemiarthroplasty surgery: potential opportunities to shorten lengths of hospital stay. Am J Med. 1994;97:208-213.