Six sigma robust design methodology based on response surface model

Shanghai Jiaotong Daxue Xuebao/Journal of Shanghai Jiaotong University

Volumn 40, Issue 2, 2006, Pages 201-205

  Li, Yu Qiang ^a   Cui, Zhen Shan ^a   Chen, Jun ^a   Ruan, Xue Yu ^a   Zhang, Dong Juan ^a  

^a SHANGHAI JIAO TONG UNIVERSITY   (China)

Author keywords

Deterministic optimization; Reliability based optimization; Response surface methodology; Robust design

Indexed keywords

DRAWING (FORMING); DYNAMIC RESPONSE; OPTIMIZATION; QUALITY CONTROL; RELIABILITY THEORY; UNCERTAIN SYSTEMS;

CANTILEVER; CYLINDRICAL CUP; DEEP-DRAW FORMING; DETERMINISTIC OPTIMIZATION; RELIABILITY-BASED OPTIMIZATION; RESPONSE SURFACE METHODOLOGY; RESPONSE SURFACE MODEL; SIX SIGMA ROBUST DESIGN;

ROBUSTNESS (CONTROL SYSTEMS);

EID: 33744745950     PISSN: 10062467     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (10)

1. Maglaras G, Ponslet E, Haftka R T, et al. Analytical and experimental comparison of probabilistic and deterministic optimization[J]. AIAA Journal, 1996, 34(7): 1512-1518.
2. Nikolaidis E, Stroud W J. Reliability-based optimization: A proposed analytical-experimental study[J]. AIAA Journal, 1996, 34(10): 2154-2161.
3. Youn B D, Choi K K, Yang R J, et al. Reliability based design optimization for crashworthiness of vehicle side impact[J]. Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization, 2004, 26(3-4): 272-283.
4. Arvidsson M, Gremyr I, Johansson P. Use and knowledge of robust design methodology: A survey of Swedish industry[J]. Journal of Engineering Design, 2003, 14(2): 129-143.
5. CHEN Jian-jiang, ZHONG Yi-fang, XIAO Ren-bin. Design method of robust optimization based on orthogonal tests and its application[J]. China Mechanical Engineering, 2004, 15(4): 283-286.
6. YU Li-lei, TANG Wen-yong, ZHANG Sheng-kun, et al. Robust optimization design method for engineering structures[J]. Journal of Shanghai Jiaotong University, 2003, 37(8): 1189-1192.
7. Forrest W, Breyfogle III. Implementing six sigma: Smarter solutions using statistical methods[M]. New Jersey: John Wiley and Sons, 2003.
8. Lucas J M. How to achieve a robust process using response surface methodology[J]. Journal of Quality Technology, 1994, 26(4): 248-260.
9. Jansson T, Nilsson L, Redhe M. Using surrogate models and response surfaces in structural optimization-with application to crashworthiness design and sheet metal forming[J]. Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization, 2003, 25(2): 129-140.