Adverse effects of porcine small intestine submucosa implants in experimental ventral hernia repair

Surgical Endoscopy and Other Interventional Techniques

Volumn 20, Issue 6, 2006, Pages 942-946

  Petter Puchner, A H ^a   Fortelny, R H ^b   Mittermayr, R ^a   Walder, N ^a   Ohlinger W ^c   Redl, H ^a  

^a LUDWIG BOLTZMANN INSTITUTE FOR EXPERIMENTAL AND CLINICAL TRAUMATOLOGY   (Austria)

^b II Department of Surgery   (Austria)

^c General Hospital Krems   (Austria)

Author keywords

Biocompatibility; Experimental hernia repair; Small intestine submucosa

Indexed keywords

ABDOMINAL WALL HERNIA; ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ANIMAL MODEL; ANIMAL TISSUE; ARTICLE; BETA HEMOLYTIC STREPTOCOCCUS; BIOCOMPATIBILITY; BIODEGRADABILITY; CONTROLLED STUDY; ENCAPSULATION; HERNIOPLASTY; HISTOLOGY; IMPLANT; INFLAMMATION; LYSIS; MALE; NONHUMAN; PERITONEUM; POSTOPERATIVE PERIOD; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RAT; SEROMA; SMALL INTESTINE SUBMUCOSA IMPLANT; SURGICAL EQUIPMENT; SUTURE; SWINE; TECHNIQUE; TISSUE FIXATION; TISSUE NECROSIS;

ANIMALS; BIOPROSTHESIS; DRAINAGE; HERNIA, VENTRAL; INFLAMMATION; INTESTINAL MUCOSA; INTESTINE, SMALL; NECROSIS; RATS; RATS, SPRAGUE-DAWLEY; SEROMA; STREPTOCOCCUS; SWINE;

EID: 33744740763     PISSN: 09302794     EISSN: 14322218     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00464-005-0568-9     Document Type: Article

References (23)

1. Campanelli G, Nicolosi FM, Pettinari D, Avesani EC (2004) Prosthetic repair, intestinal resection, and potentially contaminated areas: safe and feasible? Hernia 8: 190-192
2. Conze J, Rosch R, Klinge U, Weiss C, Anurov M, Titkowa S, Oettinger A, Schumpelick V (2004) Polypropylene in the intra-abdominal position: influence of pore size and surface area. Hernia 8: 365-372
3. Falagas ME, Kasiakou SK (2005) Mesh-related infections after hernia repair surgery. Clin Microbiol Infect 11: 3-8
4. Franklin ME Jr, Gonzalez JJ Jr, Glass JL (2004) Use of porcine small intestinal submucosa as a prosthetic device for laparoscopic repair of hernias in contaminated fields: 2-year follow-up. Hernia 8: 186-189
5. Helton WS, Fisichella PM, Berger R, Horgan S, Espat NJ, Abcarian H (2005) Short-term outcomes with small intestinal submucosa for ventral abdominal hernia. Arch Surg 140: 549-560
6. Hofbauer C, Andersen PV, Juul P, Qvist N (1998) Late mesh rejection as a complication to transabdominal preperitoneal laparoscopic hernia repair. Surg Endosc 12: 1164-1165
7. Jernigan TW, Croce MA, Cagiannos C, Shell DH, Handorf CR, Fabian TC (2004) Small intestinal submucosa for vascular reconstruction in the presence of gastrointestinal contamination. Ann Surg 239: 733-738
8. Katkhouda N, Mavor E, Friedlander MH, Mason RJ, Kiyabu M, Grant SW, Achanta K, Kirkman EL, Narayanan K, Essani R (2001) Use of fibrin sealant for prosthetic mesh fixation in laparoscopic extraperitoneal inguinal hernia repair. Ann Surg 233: 18-25
9. Klinge U, Klosterhalfen B, Birkenhauer V, Junge K, Conze J, Schumpelick V (2002) Impact of polymer pore size on the interface scar formation in a rat model. J Surg Res 103: 208-214
10. Kumar S, Wilson RG, Nixon SJ, Macintyre IM (2002) Chronic pain after laparoscopic and open mesh repair of groin hernia. Br J Surg 89: 1476-1479
11. Ladurner R, Mussack T (2004) Small bowel perforation due to protruding spiral tackers: a rare complication in laparoscopic incisional hernia repair. Surg Endosc 18: 1001
12. McCormack K, Scott NW, Go PM, Ross S, Grant AM (2003) Laparoscopic techniques versus open techniques for inguinal hernia repair. Cochrane Database Syst Rev CD001785
13. McCready RA, Hodde J, Irwin RJ, Coffey AC, Divelbiss JL, Bryant MA, Chitwood RW, Paget DS, Chess BA (2005) Pseudoaneurysm formation in a subset of patients with small intestinal submucosa biologic patches after carotid endarterectomy. J Vasc Surg 41: 782-788
14. McGreevy JM, Goodney PP, Birkmeyer CM, Finlayson SR, Laycock WS, Birkmeyer JD (2003) A prospective study comparing the complication rates between laparoscopic and open ventral hernia repairs. Surg Endosc 17: 1778-1780
15. Moon V, Chaudry GA, Choy C, Ferzli GS (2004) Mesh infection in the era of laparoscopy. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A 14: 349-352
16. Neumayer L, Giobbie-Hurder A, Jonasson O, Fitzgibbons R Jr, Dunlop D, Gibbs J, Reda D, Henderson W (2004) Open mesh versus laparoscopic mesh repair of inguinal hernia. N Engl J Med 350: 1819-1827
17. O'Dwyer PJ, Kingsnorth AN, Molloy RG, Small PK, Lammers B, Horeyseck G (2005) Randomized clinical trial assessing impact of a lightweight or heavyweight mesh on chronic pain after inguinal hernia repair. Br J Surg 92: 166-170
18. Paajanen H (2002) Do absorbable mesh sutures cause less chronic pain than nonabsorbable sutures after Lichtenstein inguinal herniorraphy? Hernia 6: 26-28
19. Petter-Puchner A, Fortelny R, Mittermayr R, Öhlinger W, Redl H (2005) Fibrin sealing versus stapling of hernia meshes in an onlay model in the rat. Hernia 9: 322-329
20. Poulose BK, Scholz S, Moore DE, Schmidt CR, Grogan EL, Lao OB, Nanney L, Davidson J, Holzman MD (2005) Physiologic properties of small intestine submucosa. J Surg Res 123: 262-267
21. Raghavan D, Kropp BP, Lin HK, Zhang Y, Cowan R, Madihally SV (2005) Physical characteristics of small intestinal submucosa scaffolds are location-dependent. J Biomed Mater Res A 73A: 90-96
22. Topart P, Vandenbroucke F, Lozach P (2005) Tisseel versus tack staples as mesh fixation in totally extraperitoneal laparoscopic repair of groin hernias: a retrospective analysis. Surg Endosc 19: 724-727
23. Winslow ER, Quasebarth M, Brunt LM (2004) Perioperative outcomes and complications of open vs laparoscopic extraperitoneal inguinal hernia repair in a mature surgical practice. Surg Endosc 18: 221-227