Craft and code: Intensification of innovation and management of knowledge

Technology, Knowledge and the Firm: Implications for Strategy and Industrial Change

Volumn , Issue , 2005, Pages 11-28

  Dodgson, Mark ^a   Gann, David M ^b   Salter, Ammon ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF QUEENSLAND   (Australia)

^b IMPERIAL COLLEGE LONDON   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 33744739596     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book    
DOI: 10.4337/9781845424619.00008     Document Type: Chapter

References (53)

1. Anumba, C. J., N.M. Bouchlaghem, J. K.Whyte and A. Duke (2000), ‘Perspectives on a Shared Construction Project Model’, International Journal of Cooperative Information Systems, 9 (3), 283-313.
2. Antonelli, C. and A. Geuna (2000), ‘Information andCommunication Technologies and the Production, Distribution and use of Knowledge’, International Journal of Technology Management, 20 (1/2), 72-105.
3. Argyris, C. and D. Schon (1978), Organizational Learning: Theory, Method and Practice, London: Addison Wesley.
4. Barney, J. (1986), ‘Strategic Factor Markets: Expectations, Luck, and Business Strategy’, Management Science, 32 (10), 1231-41.
5. Bilda, Z. and H. Demirkan (2003), ‘An Insight on Designers’ Sketching Activities in Traditional versus Digital Media’, Design Studies, 24 (1), 27-50.
6. Brown, J. S. and P. Duguid (2000), The Social Life of Information, Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
7. Bucciarelli, L. (2002), ‘Between Thought and Object in Engineering Design’, Design Studies, 23 (3), 219-31.
8. Cohen, W. and D. Levinthal (1990), ‘Absorptive Capacity: A New Perspective on Learning and Innovation’, Administrative Science Quarterly, 35 (1), 128-52.
9. Cook, S. D. N. and Brown, J. S. (1999), ‘Bridging Epistemologies: The Generative Dance between Organizational Knowledge and Organizational Knowing’, Organization Science, 10 (4), 381-400.
10. Cyert, R. and J. March (1963), The Behavioural Theory of the Firm, Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
11. Dahl, D., A. Chattopadhyay and G. Gorn (2001), ‘The Importance of Visualization in Concept Design’, Design Studies, 22 (1), 5-26.
12. Dodgson, M., D. M. Gann and A. Salter (2002), ‘The Intensification of Innovation’, International Journal of Innovation Management, 6 (1), 53-84.
13. Dodgson, M., D.M.Gannand A. Salter (forthcoming), Think, Play, Do:Technology and Innovation in the Emerging Innovation Process, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
14. Department of Trade and Industry (DTI) (2002), ‘E-Science: Building a Global Grid’, report, London: DTI.
15. Eckert, C. and M. Stacey (2000), ‘Sources of Inspiration: A Language of Design’, Design Studies, 21 (5), 523-38.
16. Fraunhofer Magazine (2002) ‘Simulation at the Touch of a Button’, Fraunhofer Magazine, 1, 22-3.
17. Gann, D. M. (2000), Building Innovation: Complex Constructs in a Changing World, London: Thomas Telford Press.
18. Gann, D. and A. Salter (1999), ‘Discussion paper on CIRIA Technical Excellence Benchmarking Group’, unpublished manuscript, Science and Technology Policy Research (SPRU), University of Sussex, Falmer.
19. Gardiner, P. and R. Rothwell (1985), ‘Tough Customers: Good Designs’, Design Studies, 6 (1), 7-17.
20. Gibbons, M., C. Limoges, H. Nowotny, S. Schwartzmann, P. Scott and M. Trow (1994), The New Production of Knowledge: The Dynamics of Science and Research in Contemporary Societies, London: Sage.
21. Grant, R. M. (1991), Contemporary Strategy Analysis, Cambridge, MA: Blackwell Business.
22. Hutchins, E. (1996), Cognition in the Wild, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
23. Ismail, A., S. Patil and S. Saigal (2002), ‘When Computers Learn to Talk: a Web Service Primer’, McKinsey Quarterly, special edition (2), 70-7.
24. March, J. and H. Simon (1958), Organizations, New York: Wiley.
25. McCullogh, M. (1996), Abstracting Craft: The Practiced Digital Hand, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
26. McGown, A., G. Green and P. Rodgers (1998), ‘Visible Ideas: Information Patterns of Conceptual Sketch Activity’, Design Studies, 19 (4), 431-53.
27. Miller, F. (2001), ‘Simulation - Can we Compute the Future?', Fraunhofer Magazine, 1, 6-11.
28. Nelson, R. and S. Winter (1982), An Evolutionary Theory of Economic Change, Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press.
29. Noble, D. F. (1986), Forces of Production: A Social History of Industrial Automation, New York: Oxford University Press.
30. Nonaka, I. and T. Nishiguchi (2001), Knowledge Emergence: Social, Technical and Evolutionary Dimensions of KnowledgeCreation, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
31. Nonaka, I. and H. Takeuchi (1995), The Knowledge-Creating Company: How Japanese Companies Create the Dynamics of Innovation, New York: Oxford University Press.
32. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) (2000), A New Economy? The Changing Role of Innovation and Information Technology in Growth, Paris: OECD.
33. Oxman, R. (2002), ‘The Thinking Eye: Visual Re-cognition in Design Emergence’, Design Studies, 23 (2), 135-64.
34. Pavitt, K. (2002), Systems Integrators as “Post-Industrial” Firms, Brighton: SPRU.
35. Penrose, E. (1959), The Theory of the Growth of the Firm, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
36. Petroski, H. (1985), To Engineer Is Human - The Role of Failure in Successful Design, New York: St Martin’s Press.
37. Reger, G. (1997), ‘Benchmarking the Internationalization and Co-ordination of R&D of Western European and Japanese Multi-national Corporations’, International Journal of Innovation Management, 1 (3), 299-331.
38. Romer, A., G. Weisshahn, U. Lindemann and W. Hacker (2001), ‘Effort-saving Product Representations in Design - Results of a Questionnaire Survey’, Design Studies, 22 (6), 473-91.
39. Salter, A. and D. M. Gann (2003), ‘Sources of Ideas for Innovation in Engineering Design’, Research Policy, 32 (8), 1309-24.
40. Schrage, M. (2000), Serious Play: How the World’s Best Companies Simulate to Innovate, Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
41. Senge, P. M. (1993), The Fifth Discipline: The Art and Practice of the Learning Organization, London: Century Business.
42. Steinmueller, E. (2000), ‘Will New Information and Communication Technologies Improve the ‘Codification’ of Knowledge’, Industrial and Corporate Change, 9 (2), 361-76.
43. Teece, D. (2002), ‘Dynamic Capabilities’, in W. Lazonick (ed.), The IEBM Handbook of Economics, London: Thomson.
44. Teece, D., G. Pisano and A. Shuen (1994), ‘Dynamic Capabilities and Strategic Management’, Strategic Management Journal, 18 (7), 509-33.
45. Thomke, S. (2001), ‘Enlightened Experimentation: The New Imperative for Innovation’, Harvard Business Review, 79 (2), 67-75.
46. Tovey, M., S. Porter and R. Newman (2003), ‘Sketching, Concept Development and Automotive Design’, Design Studies, 24 (2), 135-53.
47. Tuomi, I. (2002), Networks of Innovation: Change and Meaning in the Age of the Internet, New York: Oxford University Press.
48. Vincenti, W. G. (1990), What Engineers Know and How They Know It, Baltimore, MD and London: Johns Hopkins University Press.
49. von Hippel, E. (1988), The Sources of Innovation, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
50. Whyte, J.K. (2002), Virtual Reality in the Built Environment, London: Architectural Press.
51. Whyte, J. K. (2003), ‘Industrial Applications of Virtual Reality in Architecture and Construction’, Electronic Journal of Information Technology in Construction, special issue on virtual reality technology in architecture and construction, 8, 43-50.
52. Williams, R. (2002), Retooling: a Historian Confronts Technological Change, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
53. Williamson, O. E. (1999), ‘Strategy Research: Governance and Competence Perspectives’, Strategic Management Journal, 20 (12), 1087-108.