Determination of the bottom quark mass from the Υ(1s) system

Journal of High Energy Physics

Volumn 5, Issue 6, 2001, Pages 1-36

  Pineda, Antonio ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF KARLSRUHE   (Germany)

Author keywords

NLO Computations; QCD; Renormalization Regularization and Renormalons

Indexed keywords

EID: 33744546917     PISSN: 10298479     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1088/1126-6708/2001/06/022     Document Type: Article

References (82)

1. M.A. Shifman and M.B. Voloshin, On annihilation of mesons built from heavy and light quark and B0¯ ↔ B0 oscillations, Sov. J. Nucl. Phys. 45 (1987) 292;
2. H.D. Politzer and M.B. Wise, Leading logarithms of heavy quark masses in processes with light and heavy quarks, Phys. Lett. B 206 (1988) 681;
3. N. Isgur and M.B. Wise, Weak decays of heavy mesons in the static quark approximation, Phys. Lett. B 232 (1989) 113;
4. E. Eichten and B. Hill, An effective field theory for the calculation of matrix elements involving heavy quarks, Phys. Lett. B 234 (1990) 511;
5. H. Georgi, An effective field theory for heavy quarks at low-energies, Phys. Lett. B 240 (1990) 447;
6. B. Grinstein, The static quark effective theory, Nucl. Phys. B 339 (1990) 253.
7. W.E. Caswell and G.P. Lepage, Effective lagrangians for bound state problems in QED, QCD, and other field theories, Phys. Lett. B 167 (1986) 437;
8. G.T. Bodwin, E. Braaten and G.P. Lepage, Rigorous QCD analysis of inclusive annihilation and production of heavy quarkonium, Phys. Rev. D 51 (1995) 1125 [hep-ph/9407339], erratum ibid. 55 (1997) 5853.
9. A. Pineda and J. Soto, Effective field theory for ultrasoft momenta in NRQCD and NRQED, Nucl. Phys. 64 (Proc. Suppl.) (1998) 428 [hep-ph/9707481];
10. The lamb shift in dimensional regularization, Phys. Lett. B 420 (1998) 391 [hep-ph/9711292];
11. Potential NRQED: the positronium case, Phys. Rev. D 59 (1999) 016005 [hep-ph/9805424].
12. N. Brambilla, A. Pineda, J. Soto and A. Vairo, Potential NRQCD: an effective theory for heavy quarkonium, Nucl. Phys. B 566 (2000) 275 [hep-ph/9907240].
13. M. Luke, A.V. Manohar and M.J. Savage, Renormalons in effective field theories, Phys. Rev. D 51 (1995) 4924 [hep-ph/9407407].
14. M. Beneke, Renormalons, Phys. Rep. 317 (1999) 1 [hep-ph/9807443].
15. M. Beneke and V.M. Braun, Heavy quark effective theory beyond perturbation theory: renormalons, the pole mass and the residual mass term, Nucl. Phys. B 426 (1994) 301 [hep-ph/9402364].
16. I. Bigi, M. Shifman, N. Uraltsev and A. Vainshtein, The pole mass of the heavy quark. Perturbation theory and beyond, Phys. Rev. D 50 (1994) 2234 [hep-ph/9402360].
17. N. Gray, D.J. Broadhurst, W. Grafe and K. Schilcher, Three loop relation of quark (modified) MS and pole masses, Z. Physik C 48 (1990) 673;
18. K. Melnikov and T. van Ritbergen, The three-loop relation between the MS¯ and the pole quark masses, Phys. Lett. B 482 (2000) 99 [hep-ph/9912391];
19. s, Nucl. Phys. B 573 (2000) 617 [hep-ph/9911434].
20. W. Fischler, Quark-anti-quark potential in QCD, Nucl. Phys. B 129 (1977) 157;
21. Y. Schröder, The static potential in QCD to two loops, Phys. Lett. B 447 (1999) 321 [hep-ph/9812205];
22. M. Peter, The static quark-antiquark potential in QCD to three loops, Phys. Rev. Lett. 78 (1997) 602 [hep-ph/9610209].
23. N. Brambilla, A. Pineda, J. Soto and A. Vairo, The infrared behaviour of the static potential in perturbative QCD, Phys. Rev. D 60 (1999) 091502 [hep-ph/9903355].
24. A. Pineda and J. Soto, The renormalization group improvement of the QCD static potentials, Phys. Lett. B 495 (2000) 323 [hep-ph/0007197].
25. s, Phys. Rev. D 58 (1998) 094022 [hep-ph/9711287];
26. s ” Phys. Rev. D 61 (2000) 077505 [hep-ph/9812371];
27. S. Titard and F.J. Ynduráin, Rigourous QCD evaluation of spectrum and ground state properties of heavy quarkonium systems;
28. with a precision determination of the bottom quark mass and of the eta-b mass, Phys. Rev. D 49 (1994) 6007 [hep-ph/9310236].
29. s, Phys. Lett. B 470 (1999) 215 [hep-ph/9910238].
30. B.A. Kniehl and A.A. Penin, Ultrasoft effects in heavy quarkonium physics, Nucl. Phys. B 563 (1999) 200 [hep-ph/9907489].
31. A.H. Hoang, A.V. Manohar and I.W. Stewart, The running Coulomb potential and lamb shift in QCD, Phys. Rev. D 64 (2001) 014033 [hep-ph/0102257].
32. 0 approximation and renormalon cancellation, Phys. Lett. B 496 (2000) 83 [hep-ph/0007251].
33. A.H. Hoang, Bottom quark mass from upsilon mesons: charm mass effects, hep-ph/0008102.
34. M. Beneke, A. Signer and V.A. Smirnov, Two-loop correction to the leptonic decay of quarkonium, Phys. Rev. lett. 80 (1998) 2535–2538 [hep-ph/9712302];
35. − annihilation near the threshold, Phys. Rev. Lett. 80 (1998) 2531.
36. A.H. Hoang, Bottom quark mass from upsilon mesons, Phys. Rev. D 59 (1999) 014039 [hep-ph/9803454];
37. l ) in the next-to-next-to-leading order, Nucl. Phys. B 549 (1999) 217 [hep-ph/9807421].
38. s ) accuracy, Nucl. Phys. B 528 (1998) 59 [hep-ph/9802379];
39. M. Beneke and A. Signer, The bottom MS¯ quark mass from sum rules at next-to-next-to-leading order, Phys. Lett. B 471 (1999) 233 [hep-ph/9906475].
40. A.H. Hoang et al., Top–anti-top pair production close to threshold: synopsis of recent NNLO results, Eur. Phys. J. direct, C3 (2000) 1 [hep-ph/0001286].
41. A.S. Kronfeld, The perturbative pole mass in QCD, Phys. Rev. D 58 (1998) 051501 [hep-ph/9805215].
42. M. Beneke, More on ambiguities in the pole mass, Phys. Lett. B 344 (1995) 341 [hep-ph/9408380].
43. T. Lee, Normalization constants of large order behavior, Phys. Lett. B 462 (1999) 1 [hep-ph/9908225].
44. G. Cvetič and T. Lee, Bilocal expansion of Borel amplitude and hadronic tau decay width, Phys. Rev. D 64 (2001) 014030 [hep-ph/0101297].
45. M. Beneke and V.M. Braun, Naive nonabelianization and resummation of fermion bubble chains, Phys. Lett. B 348 (1995) 513 [hep-ph/9411229];
46. n corrections in QCD: Techniques and applications to the τ hadronic width and the heavy quark pole mass, Nucl. Phys. B 452 (1995) 563 [hep-ph/9502300].
47. s corrections to mass dependent observables, Phys. Lett. B 402 (1997) 359 [hep-ph/9703226].
48. T. van Ritbergen, J.A.M. Vermaseren and S.A. Larin, The four loop beta function in quantum chromodynamics, Phys. Lett. B 400 (1997) 379 [hep-ph/9701390].
49. T. Appelquist, M. Dine and I. J. Muzinich, Phys. Rev. D 17 (1978) 2074.
50. A. Pineda, PhD. thesis, Univ. Barcelona, January (1998);
51. A.H. Hoang, M.C. Smith, T. Stelzer and S. Willenbrock, Quarkonia and the pole mass, Phys. Rev. D 59 (1999) 114014 [hep-ph/9804227].
52. M. Beneke, A quark mass definition adequate for threshold problems, Phys. Lett. B 434 (1998) 115, [hep-ph/9804241].
53. U. Aglietti and Z. Ligeti, Renormalons and confinement, Phys. Lett. B 364 (1995) 75 [hep-ph/9503209].
54. A.H. Hoang, Z. Ligeti and A.V. Manohar, B decay and the upsilon mass, Phys. Rev. Lett. 82 (1999) 277 [hep-ph/9809423].
55. O. Yakovlev and S. Groote, Top quark mass definition and t anti-t production near threshold at the NLC, Phys. Rev. D 63 (2001) 074012 [hep-ph/0008156].
56. 2 (Zα) correction, Phys. Rev. D 53 (1996) 4909 [hep-ph/9512327];
57. P. Labelle, Effective field theories for qed bound states: extending nonrelativistic QED to study retardation effects, Phys. Rev. D 58 (1998) 093013 [hep-ph/9608491];
58. B. Grinstein and I.Z. Rothstein, Effective field theory and matching in non-relativistic gauge theories, Phys. Rev. D 57 (1998) 78 [hep-ph/9703298];
59. M. Luke and M.J. Savage, Power counting in dimensionally regularized NRQCD, Phys. Rev. D 57 (1998) 413 [hep-ph/9707313].
60. m, Phys. Rev. D 56 (1997) 230 [hep-ph/9701294];
61. A. Pineda and J. Soto, Matching at one loop for the four-quark operators in nrQCD, Phys. Rev. D 58 (1998) 114011 [hep-ph/9802365].
62. M. Beneke and V.A. Smirnov, Asymptotic expansion of Feynman integrals near threshold, Nucl. Phys. B 522 (1998) 321 [hep-ph/9711391].
63. K.G. Chetyrkin, J.H. Kuhn and M. Steinhauser, Rundec: a mathematica package for running and decoupling of the strong coupling and quark masses, Comput. Phys. Commun. 133 (2000) 43 [hep-ph/0004189].
64. M. Beneke, Perturbative heavy quark-antiquark systems, hep-ph/9911490.
65. M.B. Voloshin, On dynamics of heavy quarks in nonperturbative QCD vacuum, Nucl. Phys. B 154 (1979) 365.
66. A. Pineda, Next-to-leading nonperturbative calculation in heavy quarkonium, Nucl. Phys. B 494 (1997) 213 [hep-ph/9611388].
67. H. Leutwyler, How to use heavy quarks to probe the QCD vacuum, Phys. Lett. B 98 (1981) 447;
68. M.B. Voloshin, Precoulomb behavior of heavy quarkonium levels, Sov. J. Nucl. Phys. 36 (1982) 143.
69. H.G. Dosch and Y.A. Simonov, The area law of the wilson loop and vacuum field correlators, Phys. Lett. B 205 (1988) 339.
70. Y.A. Simonov, Nonperturbative dynamics of heavy quarkonia, Nucl. Phys. B 324 (1989) 67.
71. I.I. Balitsky, Wilson loop for the stretched contours in vacuum fields and the small distance behavior of the interquark potential, Nucl. Phys. B 254 (1985) 166.
72. A.D. Giacomo, E. Meggiolaro and H. Panagopoulos, Gauge-invariant field strength correlations in QCD at zero and non-zero temperature, Nucl. Phys. B 483 (1997) 371 [hep-lat/9603018];
73. M. D’Elia, A.D. Giacomo and E. Meggiolaro, Field strength correlators in full QCD, Phys. Lett. B 408 (1997) 315 [hep-lat/9705032].
74. V. Gimenez, L. Giusti, G. Martinelli and F. Rapuano, NNLO unquenched calculation of the b quark mass, J. High Energy Phys. 03 (2000) 018 [hep-lat/0002007].
75. Z ) from LEP data, Phys. Rev. Lett. 79 (1997) 193 [hep-ph/9703358].
76. b from QCD sum rules for bb, Int. J. Mod. Phys. A 10 (1995) 2865 [hep-ph/9502224];
77. c meson sum rules at next-to-leading order, hep-ph/0005127.
78. M. Neubert, Introduction to B physics, hep-ph/0001334.
79. M. Eidemuller and M. Jamin, Charm quark mass from QCD sum rules for the char-monium system, Phys. Lett. B 498 (2001) 203 [hep-ph/0010334];
80. N. Brambilla, Y. Sumino and A. Vairo, Quarkonium spectroscopy and perturbative QCD: a new perspective, hep-ph/0101305.
81. M. Melles, Massive fermionic corrections to the heavy quark potential through two loops, Phys. Rev. D 58 (1998) 114004 [hep-ph/9805216];
82. D. Eiras and J. Soto, Light fermion finite mass effects in non-relativistic bound states, Phys. Lett. B 491 (2000) 101 [hep-ph/0005066].