Prominent Audit Clients and the Relation between Discretionary Accruals and Non-Audit Service Fees

Advances in Accounting

Volumn 22, Issue , 2006, Pages 123-148

  Dee, Carol Callaway ^a   Lulseged, Ayalew ^a   Nowlin, Tanya S ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 33744546027     PISSN: 08826110     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1016/S0882-6110(06)22006-6     Document Type: Review

References (21)

1. Ashbaugh H., LaFond R., and Mayhew B. Do non-audit services compromise auditor independence? Further evidence. The Accounting Review 78 July (2003) 611-639
2. Becker C., DeFond M., Jiambalvo J., and Subramanyam K. The effects of audit quality on earnings management. Contemporary Accounting Research 15 Spring (1998) 1-24
3. Belsley W., Kuh F., and Welsch R. Regression diagnostics: Identifying influential data and sources of collinearity (1980), Wiley, New York
4. Chung H., and Kallapur S. Client importance, non-audit services, and abnormal accruals. The Accounting Review 78 October (2003) 931-955
5. DeAngelo L. Auditor size and audit quality. Journal of Accounting and Economics 3 (1981) 183-199
6. DeFond M., Raghunandan K., and Subramanyam K. Do non-audit service fees impair auditor independence? Evidence from going concern audit opinions. Journal of Accounting Research 40 September (2002) 1247-1274
7. DeFond M., and Subramanyam K. Auditor changes and discretionary accruals. Journal of Accounting and Economics 25 February (1998) 35-67
8. Francis J. The effect of audit firm size on audit prices: A study of the Australian market. Journal of Accounting and Economics 6 August (1984) 133-151
9. Frankel R., Johnson M., and Nelson K. The relation between auditors' fees for non-audit services and earnings management. The Accounting Review 77 Suppl. (2002) 71-105
10. Jones J. Earnings management during import relief investigations. Journal of Accounting Research 29 Autumn (1991) 193-228
11. Kinney W., and Libby R. Discussion of the relation between auditors' fees for non-audit services and earnings management. The Accounting Review 77 Suppl. (2002) 107-114
12. Kothari S., Leone A., and Wasley C. Performance matched discretionary accrual measures. Journal of Accounting and Economics 39 (2005) 163-197
13. Lev B. Corporate earnings: Facts and fiction. Journal of Economic Perspectives 17 Spring (2003) 27-50
14. Maher M., Tiessen P., Colson R., and Broman A. Competition and audit fees. The Accounting Review 67 January (1992) 199-211
15. Palmrose Z.-V. Audit fees and auditor size: Further evidence. Journal of Accounting Research 24 Spring (1986) 97-110
16. Reynolds J., Deis D., and Francis J. Professional service fees and auditor objectivity. Auditing: A Journal of Practice and Theory 23 (2004) 29-52
17. Reynolds J., and Francis J. Does size matter? The influence of large clients on office-level auditor reporting decisions. Journal of Accounting and Economics 30 (2001) 375-400
18. Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. (2002). Pub. L. No. 107-204, § 201, 116 STAT. 771.
19. Toffler B. Final accounting (2003), Random House, Inc, New York
20. Unger, L. (2001). Speech by SEC Acting Chairman: This Year's Proxy Season: Sunlight shines on auditor independence and executive compensation. Remarks delivered at the Center for Professional Education, Inc. Washington, DC, June 25, 2001. Available from http://www.sec.gov/news/speech/spch502.htm
21. White H. A heteroskedasticity-consistent covariance matrix estimator and a direct test for heteroskedasticity. Econometrica 48 (1980) 817-838