The trained observer better predicts daytime ABPM diastolic blood pressure in hypertensive patients than does an automated (Omron) device

Blood Pressure Monitoring

Volumn 11, Issue 2, 2006, Pages 53-58

  Graves, John W ^a,c   Grossardt, Brandon R ^a   Gullerud, Rachel E ^a   Bailey, Kent R ^a   Feldstein, Jeffrey ^b  

^a MAYO CLINIC   (United States)

^b NOVARTIS PHARMA AG   (Switzerland)

^c MAYO CLINIC COLLEGE OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

Accurate blood pressure measurement; Auscultatory blood pressure; Clinical trials; Omron 705cp; Oscillometric blood pressure

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; AUSCULTATION; BLOOD PRESSURE MEASUREMENT; BLOOD PRESSURE MONITORING; CIRCADIAN RHYTHM; COMPARATIVE STUDY; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORRELATION ANALYSIS; DEVICE; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; DIASTOLIC BLOOD PRESSURE; EVALUATION; FEMALE; HUMAN; HYPERTENSION; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; OBSERVER VARIATION; OSCILLOMETRY; POST HOC ANALYSIS; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SYSTOLIC BLOOD PRESSURE; AUTOMATION; CLINICAL TRIAL; DIASTOLE; INSTRUMENTATION; MIDDLE AGED; STANDARD;

ADULT; AGED; AUTOMATION; BLOOD PRESSURE DETERMINATION; BLOOD PRESSURE MONITORING, AMBULATORY; CLINICAL TRIALS; DIASTOLE; FEMALE; HUMANS; HYPERTENSION; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; OBSERVER VARIATION;

EID: 33744529182     PISSN: 13595237     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/01.mbp.0000200480.26669.72     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Pickering TG, Hall JE, Appel LJ, Falkner BE, Graves JW, Hill MN, et al. Recommendations for blood pressure measurement in humans and experimental animals. Part 1: measurement in humans. A statement for professionals from the subcommittee of Professional and Public Education of the American Heart Association Council on High Blood Pressure Research. Hypertension 2005; 45:142-161.
2. O'Brien E, Asmar R, Beilin L, Imai Y, Mallion JM, Mancia G, et al. European Society of Hypertension recommendations for conventional, ambulatory, and home blood pressure measurement. J Hypertens 2003; 21:821-848.
3. Chobanian AV, Bakris GL, Black HR, Cushman WC, Green LA, Izzo J, et al. The Seventh Report of the Joint National Committee on prevention, detection, evaluation, and treatment of high blood pressure. The JNC VII Report. JAMA 2003; 289:2560-2572.
4. Chalmers J, MacMahon S, Mancia G, Whitworth J, Beilin L, Hansson L, et al. World Health Organization-International Society of Hypertension Guidelines for the management of hypertension. Guidelines sub-committee of the World Health Organization. Clin Exp Hypertens (New York) 1999; 21:1009-1060.
5. Bruce NG, Shaper AG, Walker M, Wannamethee G. Observer bias in blood pressure studies. J Hypertens 1988; 6:375-380.
6. Patterson H. Sources of error in rewarding the blood pressure of patients with hypertension in general practice. BMJ 1984; 289:1661-1664.
7. Wingfield D, Looke J, Thijis L, Staessen J, Fletcher AE, Fagard R, et al. For the Syst-Eur investigators terminal digit preference and single number preference in Syst-Eur: influence of quality control blood pressure monitoring. Blood Press Monit 2002; 7:169-177.
8. Hansson L, Zanchetti A, Carruthers SG, Dahlof B, Elmfeldt D, Julius S, et al., for the HOT Study. Effect of intensive blood pressure lowering and low dose aspirin in patients with hypertension: principal results of the Hypertension Optimal Treatment (HOT) randomized trial. Lancet 1998; 351:1755-1762.
9. UKPDS Group. UK Prospective Diabetes Study VIII: study design, progress and performance. Diabetologia 1991; 34:877-890, automated.
10. Den Hond E, Staessen JA, Celis H, Fagard R, Keary L, Vandenhoven G, O'Brien ET. Antihypertensive treatment based on home or office blood pressure:the THOP trial. Blood Press Monit 2004; 9:311-314.
11. Graves JW, Nash C, Burger K, Bailey K, Sheps SG. Clinical decision making in hypertension using an automated (BpTRU) measurement device. J Hum Hypertens 2003; 17:823-827.
12. Myers MG, Valdivieso MA. Use of an automated blood pressure recording device, the BpTRU, to reduce the 'white coat effect' in routine practice. Am J Hypertens 2003; 16:494-497.
13. Jones DW, Frohlich ED, Grim CM, Grim CE, Taubert KA. Mercury sphygmomanometers should not be abandoned: an advisory statement from the Council for High Blood Pressure Research, American Heart Association. Hypertension 2001; 37:185-186.
14. Sokolow M, Werdegar D, Kain HK, Hinman AT. Relationship between level of blood pressure measured casually and by portable recorders and severity of complications in essential hypertension. Circulation 1966; XXXIV:279-298.
15. Perloff D, Soklolow M, Cowan R. Prognostic value of ambulatory blood pressure. JAMA 1983; 249:2792-2798.
16. Verdecchia P, Schillaci G, Guerrieri M, Gotteschi C, Beurmio G, Boldrini F, et al. Circadian blood pressure changes and left ventricular hypertrophy in essential hypertension. Circulation 1990; 81:528-536.
17. Opsahl JA, Abraham PA, Halstenson CE, Keane WF. Correlation of office and ambulatory blood pressure measurements with urinary albumin and N-acetyl-beta-glucosaminidase excretion in essential hypertension. Am J Hypertension 1988; 1:1175-1205.
18. Clement DL, De Buyzere ML, Bacquer DA, de Leeuw PW, Duprez DA, Fagard RH, et al. Prognostic value of ambulatory blood pressure recordings in patients with treated hypertension. N Eng J Med 2003; 348:2407-2415.
19. Dolan E, Stanton A, Thijis L, Hinedi K, Atkins N, McClory S, et al. Superiority of ambulatory over clinic blood pressure measurement in predicting mortality. The Dublin Outcome Study. Hypertension 2005; 46:156-161.
20. US Environmental Protection Agency. Mercury study report to congress, Volume I: executive summary. Washington, DC: Environmental Protection Agency; 1997. Publication EPA-452/R-97-003.
21. Williams EJ. The comparison of regression variables. J R Stat Soc Ser B 1959; 21:396-399.
22. Hittner JB, May K, Silver NC. A Monte Carlo Evaluation of Tests for Comparing Dependent Correlations. J Gen Psychol 2003; 130:149-168.
23. Altman DG, Bland JM. Measurement in medicine: the analysis of method comparison studies. Statistician 1983; 32:307-317.
24. O'Brien E, Mee F, Atkins N, Thomas M. Evaluation of three devices for self measurement of blood pressure according to the revised British Hypertension Society Protocol: the Omron HEM-705CP, Philips HP5332, and Nissei DS-175. Blood Press Monit 1996; 1:55-61.
25. Lacourciere Y, Asmar R. A comparison of the efficacy and duration of action of candesartan cilexetil and losartan as assessed by clinic and ambulatory blood pressure after a missed dose, in truly hypertensive patients. Am J Hypertens 1999; 12:1181-1187.
26. Staessen JA, Thijis L, Clement D, Davidson C, Fagard R, Lehtonen A, et al. for the Syst Eur Investigators. Ambulatory blood pressure decreases on long term placebo treatment in older patients with isolated systolic hypertension. J Hypertens 1994; 12:1035-1039.
27. O'Brien E, Petrie J, Littler WA, de Swiet M, Padfield PL, Altman D, et al. The British Hypertension Society Protocol for the evaluation of blood pressure measuring devices. J Hypertens 1993; 11(Suppl 2):S43-S63.
28. Sever PS, Dahlof B, Poulter NR, Wedel H, Beevers G, Caulfield M, et al. ASCOT Steering Committee, Anglo-Scandinavian Cardiac Outcomes Trial. Anglo-Scandinavian Cardiac Outcomes Trial: a brief history, rationale and outline protocol. J Hum Hypertens 2001; 15(Suppl 1):S11-S12.
29. American National Standard. Electronic or automated sphygmomanometers. Arlington, Virginia: Association for the Advancement of Medical Instrumentation; 1993.
30. O'Brien E, Pickering T, Asmar R, Myers M, Parati G, Staessen J, et al. On behalf of the working group on blood pressure monitoring of the European Society of Hypertension. Working Group on Blood Pressure Monitoring of the European Society of Hypertension International Protocol for validation of blood pressure measuring devices in adults. Blood Press Monit 2002; 7:3-17.
31. Graves JW, Tibor M, Blainthnead M, Klein L, Sheps SG. The Accoson Greenlight 300TM, the first non-automated mercury-free blood pressure measurement device to pass the international protocol for blood pressure measuring devices in adults. Blood Press Monit 2004; 9:13-1 7.
32. Pickering T. The case of hybrid sphygmomanometer. Blood Press Monit 2001; 6:177-179.