Sensor location for stable nonlinear dynamic systems: Multiple sensor case

Industrial and Engineering Chemistry Research

Volumn 45, Issue 10, 2006, Pages 3615-3623

  Singh, Abhay K ^a   Hahn, Juergen ^a  

^a Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

MULTIPLE LOCAL OPTIMA; NONLINEAR BINARY DISTILLATION COLUMN; NONLINEAR DYNAMIC SYSTEMS; PROCESS INFORMATION;

COMPUTATION THEORY; DISTILLATION COLUMNS; GENETIC ALGORITHMS; NONLINEAR PROGRAMMING; PROCESS CONTROL; SENSORS;

NONLINEAR CONTROL SYSTEMS;

COMPUTATION THEORY; DISTILLATION COLUMNS; GENETIC ALGORITHMS; NONLINEAR CONTROL SYSTEMS; NONLINEAR PROGRAMMING; PROCESS CONTROL; SENSORS;

EID: 33744528678     PISSN: 08885885     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1021/ie0511175     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. Singh, A. K.; Hahn, J. Determining Optimal Sensor Locations for State and Parameter Estimation for Stable Nonlinear Systems. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2005, 44 (15), 5645.
2. Fairman, F. W. Linear Control Theory: The State Space Approach; John Wiley & Sons: West Sussex, England 1998.
3. Muller, P. C.; Weber, H. I. Analysis and optimization of certain quantities of controllability and observability for linear dynamic system. Automatica 1972, 8, 237.
4. Dochain, D.; Tali-Mammar, N.; Babary, J. P. On modeling, monitoring and control of fixed bed bioreactors. Comput. Chem. Eng. 1997, 21, 1255.
5. Waldraff, W.; Dochain, D.; Bourrel, S.; Magnus, A. On the use of observability measures for sensor location in tubular reactor. J. Process Control 1998, 8, 497.
6. Van den Berg, F. W. J.; Hoefsloot, H. C. J.; Boelens, H. F. M.; Smilde, A. K. Selection of optimal sensor position in a tubular reactor using robust degree of observability criteria. Chem. Eng. Sci. 2000, 55, 827.
7. Goldberg, D. E. Genetic algorithms in search, optimization, and machine learning; Addison-Wesley Pub. Co.: Reading, MA, 1989.
8. Bagajewicz, M. J. Process Plant Instrumentation: Design and Upgrade; Technomic Publishing Company: Lancaster, PA, 2001.
9. Vaclavek, V.; Loucka, M. Selection of Measurements Necessary to Achieve Multicomponent Mass Balances in Chemical Plant. Chem. Eng. Sci. 1976, 31, 1199.
10. Kretsovalis, A.; Mah, R. S. H. Effect of Redundancy on Estimation Accuracy in Process Data Reconciliation. Chem. Eng. Sci. 1987, 31, 1199.
11. Madron, F.; Veverka, V. Optimal Selection of Measuring Points in Complex Plant by Linear Methods. AIChE J. 1992, 38, 227.
12. Ali, Y.; Narsimhan, S. Sensor network design for maximizing reliability of linear processes. AIChE J. 1993, 39, 821.
13. Ali, Y.; Narsimhan, S. Redundant Sensor Network Design for Linear Processes. AIChE J. 1995, 41, 2237.
14. Bagajewicz, M. J. Design and retrofit of sensor networks in process plants. AIChE J. 1997, 43, 2300.
15. Bagajewicz, M. J.; Sanchez, M. C. Design and Upgrade of Nonredundant and Redundant Linear Sensor Networks. AIChE J. 1999, 45, 1927.
16. Chmielewski, D. J.; Palmer, T.; Manousiouthakis, V. On the theory of optimal sensor placement. AIChE J. 2002, 48, 1001.
17. Benqlilou, C.; Graells, M.; Muslin, E.; Puigjaner, L. Desig and Retrofit of Reliable Sensor Networks. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2004, 43, 8026.
18. Omatu, S.; Koide, S.; Soeda, T. Optimal sensor location for a linear distributed parameter system. IEEE Trans. Autom. Control 1978, 23, 665.
19. Kumar, S.; Seinfeld, S. H. Optimal location of measurements in tubular reactors. Chem. Eng. Sci. 1978, 33, 1507.
20. Harris, T. J.; Macgregor, J. F.; Wright, J. D. Optimal sensor location with an application to a packed bed tubular reactor. AIChE J. 1980, 26, 910.
21. Colantuoni, G.; Padmanabhan, L. Optimal sensor location for tubular-flow reactor systems. Chem. Eng. Sci. 1977, 32, 1035.
22. Jorgensen, S. B.; Goldschmidt, L.; Clement, K. A sensor location procedure for chemical processes. Comput. Chem. Eng. 1984, 3, 195.
23. Morari, M.; O'Dowd, M. J. Optimal sensor location in the presence of nonstationary noise. Automatica 1980, 16, 463.
24. Morari, M.; Stephanopoulos, G. Optimal selection of secondary measurements within the framework of state estimation in the presence of persistent unknown disturbances. AIChE J. 1980, 26, 247.
25. Romagnoli, J.; Alvarez, J.; Stephanopolus, G. Variable measurement structures for process control. Int. J. Control 1981, 33, 269.
26. Alvarez, J.; Romangnoli, J. A.; Stephanopoulous, G. Variable measurements structures for the control of a tubular reactor. Chem. Eng. Sci. 1981, 36, 1695.
27. Athans, M. On the determination of optimal costly measurement strategies for linear stochastic systems. Automatica 1972, 8, 397.
28. Mellefont, D.; Sargent, R. Selection of measurements for optimal feedback control. Ind. Eng. Chem. Process Des. Dev. 1978, 17, 549.
29. Muske, K. R.; Georgakis, C. Optimal measurement system design for chemical processes. AIChE J. 2003, 49, 1488.
30. Muslin, E.; Benqlilou, C.; Bagajewicz, M. J.; Puigjaner, L. Instrumentation design based on optimal Kalman filtering. J. Process Control 2005, 15, 629.
31. Wouwer, A. V.; Point, N.; Porteman, S.; Remy, M. An approach to the selection of optimal sensor locations in distributed parameter systems. J. Process Control 2000, 10, 291.
32. Alonso, A. A.; Kevrekidis, I. G.; Banga, J. R.; Frouzakis, C. E. Optimal sensor location and reduced order observer design for distributed process system. Comput. Chem. Eng. 2004, 28, 27.
33. Lopez, T.; Alvarez, J. On the effect of the estimation structure in the functioning of a nonlinear copolymer reactor estimator. J. Process Control 2004, 14, 99.
34. Isidori, A. Nonlinear Control Systems, 3rd ed.; Springer-Verlag: New York, 1995.
35. Hermann, R.; Kerner, A. J. Nonlinear controllability and observability. IEEE Trans. Autom. Control 1977, 22, 728.
36. Damak, T.; Babary, J. P.; Nihtila, M. T. Observer design and sensor location in distributed parameter bioreactors. Proceedings of DYCORD, Maryland, USA, 1992; p 87.
37. Georges, D. The use of observability and controllability gramians or functions for optimal sensor and actuator location in finite-dimensional systems. Proceedings of the 34th Conference on Decision and Control, New Orleans, LA, 1995; p 3319.
38. Scherpen, J. M. A. Balancing of nonlinear systems. Syst. Control Lett. 1993, 21, 143.
39. Lall, S.; Marsden J. E.; Glavaski, S. A subspace approach to balanced truncation for model reduction of nonlinear control systems. Int. J. Robust Nonlinear Control 2002, 12, 519.
40. Singh, A. K.; Hahn, J. On the Use of On the Use of Empirical Gramians for Controllability and Observability Analysis. Proceedings of the American Control Conference, Portland, OR, 2005; p 140.