Assessing the costs and benefits of MGP site remediation

Land Contamination and Reclamation

Volumn 14, Issue 2, 2006, Pages 352-356

  Hardisty, Paul E ^a,b   Cassie, Stuart ^b   Ellis, Jill ^b   Wallace, Steve ^c  

^a INTECSEA   (Canada)

^b WORLEYPARSONS   (United Kingdom)

^c NATIONAL GRID   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

BCR; Blight; Contaminant; Cost benefit analysis; Ecology; Economics; Gasworks; Monetized; NAPL; NPV; Property value; Public water supply; Receptors; Remediation; Risk assessment; TEV; Transfer payments

Indexed keywords

AQUIFER; COST-BENEFIT ANALYSIS; ECONOMIC ANALYSIS; ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION; GAS PRODUCTION; INDUSTRIAL WASTE; REMEDIATION; RISK ASSESSMENT; WATER SUPPLY;

NUCLEOPOLYHEDROVIRUS; TOBACCO ETCH VIRUS;

EID: 33744527514     PISSN: 09670513     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2462/09670513.725     Document Type: Article

References (3)

1. DEFRA (2003) A Study to Estimate the Disamenity Costs of Landfill in Great Britain. Final report by Cambridge Econometrics with Eftec and WRc
2. Hardisty, P.E. and Ozdemiroglu, E. (2005) The Economics of Groundwater Remediation and Protection. CRC Press, NY. 336 pp
3. Hardisty, P.E. and Ozdemiroglu, E. (2005a) The economics of remediating NAPLs in fractured aquifers. Proc. NGWA Cost of clean-Up Conference, Houston, Nov 2005.