The impact of the water background inorganic matrix on the natural organic matter removal by nanofiltration

Journal of Membrane Science

Volumn 279, Issue 1-2, 2006, Pages 513-520

  Teixeira, Margarida Ribau ^a   Rosa, Maria João ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ALGARVE   (Portugal)

Author keywords

Calcium hardness ion; Membrane water treatment; Nanofiltration; Natural organic matter; pH

Indexed keywords

CALCIUM; CONCENTRATION (PROCESS); NANOFILTRATION; PERMSELECTIVE MEMBRANES; PH; SURFACE WATERS;

CALCIUM HARDNESS ION; MEMBRANE WATER TREATMENT; NATURAL ORGANIC MATTERS;

WATER TREATMENT;

AMIDE; CALCIUM; NATURAL ORGANIC MATTER; POLYPIPERAZINE AMIDE; SURFACE WATER; UNCLASSIFIED DRUG; WATER;

CALCIUM; CONCENTRATION (PROCESS); NANOFILTRATION; PERMSELECTIVE MEMBRANES; PH; SURFACE WATERS; WATER TREATMENT;

ARTICLE; CHANNEL GATING; CHEMICAL INTERACTION; HYDROPHILICITY; MEMBRANE; MOLECULAR WEIGHT; NANOFILTRATION; OSMOSIS; PH; POLARIZATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL;

EID: 33744521081     PISSN: 03767388     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.memsci.2005.12.045     Document Type: Article

References (34)

1. Hong S., and Elimelech M. Chemical and physical aspects of natural organic matter (NOM) fouling of nanofiltration membranes. J. Membr. Sci. 132 (1997) 159-181
2. Schäfer A.I., Fane A.G., and Waite T.D. Nanofiltration of natural organic matter: removal, fouling and the influence of multivalent ions. Desalination 118 1-3 (1998) 109-122
3. Pomes M.L., Green W.R., Thurman E.M., Orem W.H., and Lerch H.E. DBP formation potential of aquatic humic substances. J. Am. Water Works Assoc. 91 3 (1999) 103-115
4. Siddiqui M., Amy G., Ryan J., and Odem W. Membranes for the control of natural organic matter from surface waters. Water Res. 34 13 (2000) 3355-3370
5. Nyström M., Kaipia L., and Luque S. Fouling and retention of nanofiltration membranes. J. Membr. Sci. 98 (1995) 249-262
6. Nilson J., and DiGiano F.A. Influence of NOM composition on nanofiltration. J. Am. Water Works Assoc. 88 5 (1996) 53-66
7. Cho J., Amy G., and Pellegrino J. Membrane filtration of natural organic matter: initial comparison of rejection and flux decline characteristics with ultrafiltration and nanofiltration membranes. Water Res. 33 11 (1999) 2517-2526
8. Stumm W. Chemistry of the Solid-Water Interface (1992), Wiley Interscience, New York
9. Amy G., and Cho J. Interactions between natural organic matter (NOM) and membranes: rejection and fouling. Water Sci. Technol. 40 9 (1999) 131-139
10. Jucker C., and Clark M.M. Adsorption of aquatic humic substances on hydrophobic ultrafiltration membranes. J. Membr. Sci. 97 (1994) 37-52
11. Seidel A., and Elimelech M. Coupling between chemical and physical interactions in natural organic matter (NOM) fouling of nanofiltration membranes: implications for fouling control. J. Membr. Sci. 203 (2002) 245-255
12. Kilduff J.E., Mattaraj S., and Belfort G. Flux decline during nanofiltration of naturally-occurring dissolved organic matter: effects of osmotic pressure, membrane permeability, and cake formation. J. Membr. Sci. 239 (2004) 39-53
13. Braghetta A., DiGiano F.A., and Ball W.P. Nanofiltration of natural organic matter: pH and ionic strength effects. J. Environ. Eng. 123 7 (1997) 628-641
14. Elimelech M., Chen W.H., and Waypa J.J. Measuring the zeta (electrokinetic) potential of reverse osmosis membranes by a streaming potential analyzer. Desalination 95 (1994) 269-286
15. Childress A.E., and Elimelech M. Effect of solution chemistry on the surface charge of polymeric reverse osmosis and nanofiltration membranes. J. Membr. Sci. 119 (1996) 253-268
16. Kimura K., Amy G., Drewes J., and Watanabe Y. Adsorption of hydrophobic compounds onto NF/RO membranes: an artifact leading to overestimation of rejection. J. Membr. Sci. 221 (2003) 89-101
17. Chellam S., and Taylor J.S. Simplified analysis of contaminant rejection during ground and surface water nanofiltration under the information collection rule. Water Res. 35 10 (2001) 2460-2474
18. Reiss C.R., Taylor J.S., and Robert C. Surface water treatment using nanofiltration-pilot testing results and design considerations. Desalination 125 (1999) 97-112
19. EPA. Enhanced Coagulation and Enhanced Precipitate Softening Guidance Manual, EPA 814-R-99-012, Office of Water (4607), United States Environmental Protection Agency, 1999.
20. Her N., Amy G., and Jarusutthirak C. Seasonal variations of nanofiltration (NF) foulants: identification and control. Desalination 132 (2000) 143-160
21. Peltier S., Cotte M., Gatel D., Herremans L., and Carvard J. Nanofiltration: improvements of water quality in a large distribution system. Proceedings of the 3rd World Water Congress of the International Water Association (IWA). Melbourne, Australia (2002)
22. Ribau Teixeira, M.M.C.G., Ultrafiltraçǎo no Tratamento de Águas para Consumo Humano, MSc Dissertation, Faculdade de Ciências e Tecnologia, Universidade Nova de Lisboa, Lisboa, 2001.
23. J.K. Edzwald, J.B. Van Benschoten, Aluminium coagulation of natural organic matter, in: H.H. Hahn, R. Klute (Eds.), Chemical Water and Wastewater Treatment, vol. 90, Springer-Verlag, Berlin, pp. 341-359.
24. H.-H. Yeh, W.-H. Wang, A study on the fouling henomena of MF membrane, in: Proceedings of the 4th Water World Congress, International Water Association, Marrakech, Moroco, 2004.
25. Rosa M.J., Cecílio T., Ribau Teixeira M., Viriato M., Coelho R., and Lucas H. Monitoring of hazardous substances at Alcantarilha's WTP, Portugal. Water Sci. Technol.: Water Supply 4 5-6 (2005) 343-353
26. L.S. Clesceri, A.E. Greenberg, A.D. Eaton, Standard Methods for the Examination of Water and Wastewater, American Public Health Association/American Water Works Association/Water Environment Federation, Washington, DC, 1998.
27. Ribau Teixeira M., Rosa M.J., and Nyström M. The role of membrane charge on nanofiltration performance. J. Membr. Sci. 265 (2005) 160-166
28. Childress A.E., and Deshmukh S.S. Effect of humic substances and anionic surfactants on the surface charge and performance of reverse osmosis membranes. Desalination 118 (1998) 167-174
29. Childress A.E., and Elimelech M. Relating nanofiltration membrane performance to membrane charge (electrokinetic) characteristics. Environ. Sci. Technol. 34 (2000) 3710-3716
30. Schäfer A.I., Fane A.G., and Waite T.D. Fouling effects on rejection in the membrane filtration of natural waters. Desalination 131 (2000) 215-224
31. Kim M.H., and Yu M.J. Characterization of NOM in the Han River and evaluation of treatability using UF-NF membrane. Environ. Res. 97 (2004) 116-123
32. Schäfer A.I. Natural Organics Removal Using Membranes. Principles, Performance and Cost (2001), Technomic Publishing Company Inc., Pennsylvania, USA
33. Zhang Y., Van der Bruggen B., Chen G.X., Braeken L., and Vandecasteele C. Removal of pesticides by nanofiltration: effect of the water matrix. Sep. Purif. Technol. 38 (2004) 163-172
34. Yoon S.-H., Lee C.-H., Kim K.-J., and Fane A.G. Effect of calcium ion on the fouling of nanofilter by humic acid in drinking water production. Water Res. 32 7 (1998) 2180-2186