Flexibility and predictability under the World Trade Organization's non-discrimination clauses

Journal of World Trade

Volumn 37, Issue 3, 2003, Pages 443-482

  Fauchald, Ole Kristian ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF OSLO   (Norway)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 33744517331     PISSN: 10116702     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.54648/trad2003024     Document Type: Article

References (38)

1. Bronckers and McNelis (2000), "Rethinking the Like Product Definition in GATT 1994: Anti-Dumping and Environmental Protection", in Cottier and Mavroidis (eds), Regulatory Barriers and the Principle of Non-Discrimination in World Trade Law (Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press), pp. 345-385.
2. Cheyne (1995), Environmental Unilateralism and the WTO/GATT System, 24 Georgia Journal of International and Comparative Law, 433.
3. Cone (1998), The Appellate Body and Harrowsmith Country Life, 32 Journal of World Trade, 103.
4. Demaret and Stewardson (1994), Border Tax Adjustments under GATT and EC Law and General Implications for Environmental Taxes, 28 Journal of World Trade 4, August, 5.
5. Davey and Pauwelyn (2000), "MFN Unconditionality: A Legal Analysis of the Concept in View of Its Evolution in the GATT/WTO Jurisprudence with Particular Reference to the Issue of 'Like Product'", in Cottier and Mavroidis (eds), Regulatory Barriers and the Principle of Non-Discrimination in World Trade Law (Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press), pp. 13-50.
6. Düerkop (1994), Trade and Environment: International Trade Law Aspects of the Proposed EC Directive Introducing a Tax on Carbon Dioxide Emissions and Energy, 31 Common Market Law Review 4, 807.
7. Ehring (2002), De Facto Discrimination in WTO Law: National and Most-Favored-Nation Treatment - or Equal Treatment?, 36 Journal of World Trade 5, October, 921.
8. See also Jean Monnet Working Paper 12/01, New York University School of Law, available at .
9. Farber and Hudec (1994), Free Trade and the Regulatory State: a GATT's-Eye View of the Dorment Commerce Clause, 47 Vanderbilt Law Review, 1401.
10. Fauchald (1998), Environmental Taxes and Trade Discrimination (The Hague: Kluwer Law International).
11. Haag (1995), Legitimizing "Environmental" Legislation under the GATT in Cafe Panel Report: More Fuel for Protectionists?, 57 University of Pittsburgh Law Review (Fall), 79.
12. Hoerner and Muller (1996), "Carbon Taxes for Climate Protection in a Competitive World", paper prepared for the Swiss Federal Office for Foreign Economic Affairs.
13. Hoerner (1998), The Role of Border Tax Adjustments in Environmental Taxation: Theory and US Experience, working paper presented at the International Workshop on Market Based Instruments and International Trade of the Institute for Environmental Studies in Amsterdam.
14. Howse and Regan (2000), The Product/Process Distinction - An Illusory Basis for "Unilateralism" in Trade Policy, 11 European Journal of International Law 2, 249.
15. Howse and Türk (2001), "The WTO Impact on Internal Regulations - A Case Study of the Canada - EC Asbestos Dispute", in De Burca and Scott (eds), The EU and the WTO. Legal and Constitutional Issues (Oxford: Hart), pp. 283-328.
16. Hudec (1998), GATT/WTO Constraints on National Regulation: Requiem for an "Aim and Effects" Test, 32 International Lawyer, 619.
17. Hudec (2000), "'Like Product': The Differences in Meaning in GATT Articles I and III", in Cottier and Mavroidis (eds), Regulatory Barriers and the Principle of Non-Discrimination in World Trade Law (Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press), pp. 103-123.
18. Irish (1993), Interpretation and Naming: The Harmonized System in Canadian Customs Tariff Law, Canadian Yearbook of International Law, p. 89.
19. Jackson (1969), World Trade and the Law of GATT: a Legal Analysis of the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (New York: Bobbs-Merrill).
20. Jackson (1992), World Trade Rules and Environmental Policies: Congruence of Conflict?, 49 Washington and Lee Law Review, 1227.
21. Kirgis (1972), Effective Pollution Control in Industrialized Countries: International Economic Disincentives, Policy Responses and the GATT, 70 Michigan Law Review, 859.
22. Knight (1999), The Dual Nature of Cultural Products: An Analysis of the World Trade Organization's Decisions Regarding Canadian Periodicals, 57 University of Toronto Law Review, 165.
23. Mattoo (1997), National Treatment in the GATS. Corner-stone or Pandora's Box, 31 Journal of World Trade 1, February, 107-135.
24. Mattoo (2000), "MFN and the GATS", in Cottier and Mavroidis (eds), Regulatory Barriers and the Principle of Non-Discrimination in World Trade Law (Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press), pp. 51-99.
25. Mattoo and Subramanian (1998), Regulatory Autonomy and Multilateral Disciplines: the Dilemma and Possible Resolution, 1 Journal of International Economic Law 2, 303.
26. Neven (2000), "The Economic Evaluation of Protection under Art III: Some Principles and Suggestions for the Definition of a Trade Relevant Market", in Cottier and Mavroidis (eds), Regulatory Barriers and the Principle of Non-Discrimination in World Trade Law (Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press), pp. 332-342.
27. OECD (1997), Eco-Labelling: Actual Effects of Selected Programmes, OECD Doc. OCDE/GD(97)105.
28. OECD (2001), Environmentally Related Taxes in OECD Countries. Issues and Strategies (OECD).
29. Petersmann (1993), International Trade Law and International Environmental Law. Prevention and Settlement of International Environmental Disputes in GATT, 27 Journal of World Trade 1, February, 43.
30. Petersmann (2000), "International Trade Law and International Environmental Law: Environmental Taxes and Border Tax Adjustment in WTO Law and EC Law", in Revesz, Sands and Stewart (eds), Environmental Law, the Economy and Sustainable Development (Cambridge University Press), p. 127.
31. Pitschas (1995), GATT/WTO Rules for Border Tax Adjustment and the Proposed European Directive Introducing a Tax on Carbon Dioxide Emissions and Energy, Georgia Journal of International and Comparative Law, 479.
32. Regan (2002), Regulatory Purpose and "Like Products" in Article III:4 of the GATT, 36 Journal of World Trade 3, June, 443-478.
33. Roessler (1996), "Diverging Domestic Policies and Multilateral Trade Integration", in Bhagwati and Hudec (eds), Fair Trade and Harmonization. Prerequisites for Free Trade?, Vol. 2 (Cambridge, MA: MIT Press), p. 21.
34. Salzman (1997), Sustainable Consumption and the Law, 27 Environmental Law, 1243.
35. Snelson (1996), Can GATT Article III Recover from Its Head-On Collision with United States - Taxes on Automobiles?, Minnesota Journal of Global Trade, 467.
36. Tsai (1999), "Like" is a Four-Letter Word - GATT Article III's "Like Product" Conundrum, 17 Berkeley Journal of International Law (Summer), 26.
37. Westin (1997), Environmental Tax Initiatives and Multilateral Trade Agreements: Dangerous Collisions (The Hague: Kluwer Law International).
38. WTO (2002), GATT/WTO Dispute Settlement Practice Relating to GATT Article XX, Paragraphs (b), (d) and (g), WTO Doc. WT/CTE/W/203.