Chemical analysis of phosphate rock using different methods - Advantages and disadvantages

X-Ray Spectrometry

Volumn 35, Issue 3, 2006, Pages 154-158

  Safi, Madian Jamil ^a   Bhagwanth Rao, M ^a   Surya Prakash Rao, K ^b   Govil, Pradip K ^c  

^a OSMANIA UNIVERSITY   (India)

^b Applied Geochemistry (R and T)   (India)

^c NATIONAL GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (India)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ALUMINA; ALUMINUM OXIDE; COST EFFECTIVENESS; HEMATITE; SILICA; SPECTROMETRY; SPECTROPHOTOMETERS; SPECTROPHOTOMETRY;

ACCURACY OF ANALYSIS; ANALYTICAL METHOD; COST EFFECTIVE; IS COSTS; PHOSPHATE ROCKS; SPECTRO-PHOTOMETRIC METHOD; SPECTROMETRIC METHODS; VOLUMETRIC METHODS; VOLUMETRICS; X RAY SPECTROMETRY;

MAGNESIA;

EID: 33744513967     PISSN: 00498246     EISSN: 10974539     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/xrs.886     Document Type: Article

References (9)

1. National Institute of Standards and Technology. Certificates of Analysis of Standard Reference Materials 694 Western Phosphate Rock and 120c Florida Phosphate Rock. SRM® Standard Reference Materials Program. NIST: Gaithersburg, MD; 2003; www.nist.gov/isrm.
2. Association of Florida Phosphate Chemists. AFPC Analytical Methods, 6th edn, vol. 9. AFPC Publications: Bartow, FL: 1980; 37.
3. Furman NH. Standard Methods of Chemical Analysis: the Elements, 6th edn, vol. 1. Van Nostrand: New York, 1962.
4. Govil PK. J. Geol. Soc. India 1985; 26: 38.
5. Brouwer P. Theory of XRF: 'Getting Acquainted with Principles', 1st edn. PANanalytical: Almelo, 2003.
6. Wang X, Li G, Zhang Q, Wang Y. Geostand. Geoanal. Res. 2004; 28: 81.
7. Figueiredo MO, da Silva TP, Veiga JP, Chevallier P. J. Phys. IV 2003; 104: 399.
8. Frayssinet P, Braye F, Weber G. J. Scanning Microsc. 1997; 19: 253.
9. European Fertilizer Manufacturers Association. Production of NPK Fertilizers by the Mixed Acid Route. Booklet No. 8. European Fertilizer Manufacturers: Brussels, 2000; 1.