From theory to practice: Lessons learned in the application of the ATM approach to developing logic models

Evaluation and Program Planning

Volumn 29, Issue 2, 2006, Pages 106-119

  Renger, Ralph ^a   Hurley, Carolyn ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ARIZONA   (United States)

^b NORTHERN ARIZONA UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

SOCIAL THEORY;

EID: 33744513578     PISSN: 01497189     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2006.01.004     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. Bloomberg L., Ganey A., Alba V., Quintero G., and Alcantara L.A. Chicano-Latino Youth Leadership Institute: An asset-based program for youth. American Journal of Health Behavior 27 S1 (2003) S45-S54
2. Bushkin, S. (2002). Weight management and promotion of a healthy lifestyle: White paper for the Medical Society of the State of New York.
3. Carlson J. Counseling through physical fitness and exercise. Elementary School Guidance and Counseling 24 4 (1990) 298-302
4. Chen H.T., and Rossi P.H. Evaluating with sense: The theory-driven approach. Evaluation Review 7 3 (1983) 283-302
5. Chen W.W., Cato B.M., and Rainford N. Using a logic model to pan and evaluate a community intervention program: A case study. International Quarterly of Community Health Education 18 4 (1998-1999) 449-458
6. CPR Group. (2004). Available from: www.cprgrp.com website of product releases.
7. den Hayer M. The temporal logic model concept. Canadian Journal of Program Evaluation 17 2 (2002) 27-47
8. Dunnagan T., Haynes G., Christopher S., and Leonardson G. Formative evaluation of a multi-site alcohol consumption intervention in pregnant women. Neurotoxicology and Teratology 25 6 (2003) 745-755
9. Gavazzi S.M. The growing up FAST diversion program: An example of juvenile justice program development for outcome evaluation. Aggression and Violent Behavior 5 2 (2000) 159-175
10. Goertzen J.R., Fahlman S.A., Hampton M.R., and Jeffery B.L. Creating logic models using grounded theory: A case example demonstrating a unique approach to logic model development. Canadian Journal of Program Evaluation 18 2 (2003) 115-138
11. Green L.W., and Kreuter M.W. Health promotion planning: An educational and ecological approach. 3rd ed. (1999), Mayfield, Mountain View, CA
12. Huntington, C. (2002). Testimony to the advisory committee on interdisciplinary, community based linkages.
13. Huntington, C. (2003). Personal communication, May 30.
14. Joint Committee on Standards for Educational Evaluation. The program evaluation standards: How to assess evaluations of educational programs. 2nd ed. (1994), Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA
15. Julian D.A., and Deyo D. Opens systems evaluation and the logic model: Program planning and evaluation tools. Evaluation and Program Planning 18 4 (1995) 331-341
16. Kellogg Foundation. (2001). Logic model development guide.
17. Kidder L.H. Research methods in social relations. 4th ed. (1981), Holt, Rinehart, & Winston, New York, NY
18. Levin T., Weiner J.S., Saravay S.M., and Deakins S. Two-year evaluation of the logic model for developing a psycho-oncology service. Psychiatric Services 55 4 (2004) 427-433
19. Lewis V.J., Blair A.J., and Booth D.A. Outcome of group therapy for body image emotionality and weight control self-efficacy. Behavioural Psychotherapy 20 2 (1992) 155-165
20. Mark M.M., Henry G.T., and Julnes G. Evaluation: An integrated framework for understanding, guiding, and improving policies and programs (2000), Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, CA
21. McLaughlin J.A., and Jordan G.B. Logic models: A tool for telling your program's performance story. Evaluation and Program Planning 22 (1999) 65-72
22. OMB. (2004). Available from: http://www.whitehouse.gov/omb/budget/fy2004/pma/healthprofessions.pdf.
23. Patton M.Q. Utilization-focused evaluation: The new century text (1997), Sage, Thousands Oaks, CA
24. Renger R., and Bourdeau B. Strategies for values inquiry: An exploratory case study. American Journal of Evaluation 25 1 (2004) 39-49
25. Renger R., and Titcomb A. A three-step approach to teaching logic models. American Journal of Evaluation 23 4 (2002) 493-503
26. Sanders J.R. The program evaluation standards. The joint committee on standards for educational evaluation. 2nd ed. (1994), Sage, Thousand Oaks, CA
27. Smithson J. Using and analyzing focus groups: Limitations and possibilities. International Journal of Social Research Methodology 3 2 (2000) 103-199
28. Stewart D., Russell D., and Hanna S. Evaluating children's rehabilitation services: An application of a programme logic model. Child: Care, Health and Development 30 5 (2004) 453-462
29. Thurston W.E., Graham J., and Hatfield J. Evaluability assessment: A catalyst for program change and improvement. Evaluation and the Health Professions 26 2 (2003) 206-221
30. United Way of America. (1996). Measuring program outcomes: A practical approach.
31. Wardle J., and Watters R. Sociocultural influences on attitudes to weight and eating: Results of a natural experiment. International Journal of Eating Disorders 35 4 (2004) 589-596
32. Weiss C.H. The stakeholder approach to evaluation: Origins and promise. In: Bryk S.A. (Ed). Stakeholder-based evaluation. New directions for program evaluation Vol. 17 (1983), Josey Bass, San Francisco, CA 3-14
33. Weiss C.H. How can theory-based evaluation make even greater headway?. Evaluation Review 21 4 (1997) 501-524