Roles of building performance assessment in stakeholder dialogue in AEC

Automation in Construction

Volumn 15, Issue 4, 2006, Pages 415-427

  Pati, Debajyoti ^a   Park, Cheol Soo ^b   Augenbroe, Godfried ^c  

^a Biju Patnaik University of Technology   (India)

^b Sungkyunkwan University   (South Korea)

^c GEORGIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY   (United States)

Author keywords

Building evaluation; Design evolution; Performance indicator; Stakeholder dialogue

Indexed keywords

DECISION MAKING; ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT; MODEL STRUCTURES; PERFORMANCE; PHYSIOLOGY;

BUILDING EVALUATION; DESIGN EVOLUTION; PERFORMANCE INDICATORS; STAKEHOLDER DIALOGUE;

STRUCTURAL DESIGN;

EID: 33744510360     PISSN: 09265805     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.autcon.2005.06.009     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. L. Koskela, An exploration towards a production theory and its application to construction. Dissertation, VTT Building Technology (VTT Publications 408, 2000 Espoo. 296 pp., 2000).
2. Schneekloth L.H., and Shibley R.G. Placemaking: The Art and Practice of Building Communities (1995), John Wiley & Sons, New York
3. Horgen T.H., Joroff M.L., Porter W.L., and Schon D.A. Excellence by Design: Transforming Workplace and Work Practice (1999), John Wiley & Sons, New York
4. Foliente G. Developments in Performance-Based Building Codes and Standards. Forest and Products Journal 50 7/8 (2000)
5. Saarinen T.F. Extent of application of environment-behavior-design research: a mid-eighties assessment. Journal of Architectural and Planning Research 12 2 (1995) 166-174
6. Winkel G.H. Implications of environmental context for validity assessments. In: Stokols D., and Altman I. (Eds). Handbook of Environmental Psychology (1987), Wiley, New York 71-97
7. Fanger P.O. Thermal Comfort (1970), Danish Technical Press
8. NEN 2916, NEN 2916: Energy performance of non-residential buildings - Determination method. Dutch Normalization Institute (NEN), The Netherlands Standardization Institute (available on-line at http://www.enper.org/index.htm?/pub/codes/codes.htm, 1999; accessed Mar. 2004).
9. National Electrical Manufacturers Association, Procedure for determining Luminaire Efficacy Ratings for Fluorescent Luminaires (NEMA Standards publication LE5-2001, 2001).
10. IESNA, Lighting handbook (Illuminating Engineering Society of North America, 2001).
11. Chauvel P., Collins J.B., Dogniaux R., and Longmore J. Glare from windows: current views of the problem. Journal of the Illuminating Engineering Society 14-1 (1982) 31-46
12. ASHRAE, ASHRAE Fundamentals (ASHRAE, 2001).
13. ASHRAE, Thermal environmental conditions for human occupancy (ANSI/ASHRAE Standard 55-1992, 1992).
14. Fanger P.O., and Christensen N.K. Perception of draught in ventilated spaces. Ergonomics 29 2 (1986) 215-235
15. Heiselberg P. Draught risk from cold vertical surfaces. Building and Environment 29-3 (1994) 297-301
16. Friedman G. Too hot too cold: diagnosing occupant complaints. ASHRAE Journal 46-1 (2004) 157-163
17. Shohet I.M., Lavy-Leibovich S., and Bar-On D. Integrated maintenance monitoring of hospital buildings. Construction Management and Economics 21 (2003) 219-228
18. Chan K.T., Lee R.H.K., and Burnett J. Maintenance performance: a case study of hospitality engineering systems. Facilities 19 13/14 (2001)
19. Barber F., and Hilberg G. Comprehensive maintenance program ensures reliable operation. Power Engineering 99 12 (1995) 27-31
20. G.L.M. Augenbroe, C.S. Park, (2002), Towards a Maintenance Performance Toolkit for GSA - interim report submitted to GSA (available on-line at http://www.publicarchitecture.gatech.edu/Research/project/gsatoolkit.htm, 2002; accessed November, 2004).
21. Wineman J.D. Office design and evaluation: an overview. Environment and Behavior 14 5 (1982) 271-298
22. Ne'eman E., Sweitzer G., and Vine E. Office worker response to lighting and daylighting issues in workspace environments: a pilot survey. Energy and Buildings vol. 6 (1984) 159-173
23. Jones B.W., Hsieh K., and Hashinaga M. The effect of air velocity on thermal comfort at moderate activity levels. ASHRAE Transactions 92 2 (1986)
24. Preiser W.F.E. The evolution of post-occupancy evaluation: toward building performance and universal design evaluation. Learning from our Buildings: A State of the Practice Summary of Post-Occupancy Evaluation (2001), National Academy Press, Washington, DC 9-22
25. Vischer J. Post-occupancy evaluation: a multifaceted tool for building improvement. Learning from our Buildings: A State of the Practice Summary of Post-Occupancy Evaluation (2001), National Academy Press, Washington, DC 23-34
26. D. Pati. Maximizing the benefits of courtroom POEs in design decision support and academia inquiry through a unified conceptual model. Doctoral dissertation, Georgia Institute of Technology. 2005.
27. AOUSC, U.S. Courts Design Guide (National Institute of Building Sciences and Fentress Incorporated, 1998).