Heat supply and reduction of polarization effects in pervaporation by two-phase feed

Journal of Membrane Science

Volumn 279, Issue 1-2, 2006, Pages 156-164

  Fontalvo, J ^a   Vorstman, M A G ^a   Wijers, J G ^a   Keurentjes, J T F ^a  

^a EINDHOVEN UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Pervaporation; Polarization; Silica membrane; Slug flow; Two phase flow

Indexed keywords

ALCOHOLS; LAMINAR FLOW; PERVAPORATION; PHASE EQUILIBRIA; POLARIZATION; TURBULENT FLOW;

PERVAPORATION MODULES; SILICA MEMBRANES; SLUG FLOW; TEMPERATURE DROP;

TWO PHASE FLOW;

2 PROPANOL; DIOXANE;

ALCOHOLS; LAMINAR FLOW; PERVAPORATION; PHASE EQUILIBRIA; POLARIZATION; TURBULENT FLOW; TWO PHASE FLOW;

ARTICLE; CALCULATION; FLOW RATE; GAS; LIQUID; MEMBRANE TRANSPORT; PERVAPORATION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; TEMPERATURE SENSITIVITY; THEORETICAL MODEL; VAPOR;

EID: 33744505649     PISSN: 03767388     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.memsci.2005.11.047     Document Type: Article

References (43)

1. Jonquieres A., Clement R., Lochon P., Neel J., Chretien B., and Dresch M. Industrial state-of-the-art of pervaporation and vapor permeation in the western countries. J. Membr. Sci. 206 (2002) 87-117
2. Ito A., Feng Y., and Sasaki H. Temperature drop of feed liquid during pervaporation. J. Membr. Sci. 133 (1997) 95-102
3. Bhattacharya S., and Hwang S.T. Concentration polarization, separation factor, and Peclet number in membrane processes. J. Membr. Sci. 132 (1997) 73-90
4. Baker R.W., Wijmans J.G., Athayde A.L., Daniels R., Ly J.H., and Le M. The effect of concentration polarization on the separation of volatile organic compounds from water by pervaporation. J. Membr. Sci. 137 (1997) 159-172
5. Mi L., and Hwang S.T. Correlation of concentration polarization and hydrodynamic parameters in hollow fiber modules. J. Membr. Sci. 159 (1999) 143-165
6. Michaels A.S. effects of feed side solute polarization on pervaporative stripping of volatile organic solutes from diluted aqueous solution: a generalized analytical treatment. J. Membr. Sci. 101 (1995) 117-126
7. Psaume R., Aptel Ph., Aurelle Y., Mora J.C., and Bersillon J.L. Pervaporation: importance of concentration polarization in the extraction of trace organics from water. J. Membr. Sci. 36 (1988) 373-384
8. Favre E. Temperature polarization in pervaporation. Desalination 154 (2003) 129-138
9. Rautenbach R., and Albrecht R. The separation potential of pervaporation. Part 2. Process design and economics. J. Membr. Sci. 25 (1985) 25-54
10. Bausa J., and Marquardt W. Shortcut design methods for hybrid membranes/distillation processes for the separation of nonideal multicomponent mixtures. Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 39 (2000) 1658-1672
11. W. Hilgendorff, A. Wenzlaff, K. Böddeker, G. Kahn, G. Lührs, Einrichtung zur Trennung von Lösungen durch Pervaporation, 1984.
12. Schleger M., Sommer S., and Melin T. Module arrangement for solvent dehydration with silica membranes. Desalination 163 (2004) 281-286
13. Cui Z.F., Chang S., and Fane A.G. The use of gas bubbling to enhance membrane processes. J. Membr. Sci. 221 (2003) 1-35
14. Taha T., and Cui Z.F. Hydrodynamic analysis of upward slug flow in tubular membranes. Desalination 145 (2002) 179-182
15. Ghosh R., and Cui Z.F. Mass transfer in gas sparged ultrafiltration: upward slug flow in tubular membranes. J. Membr. Sci. 162 (1999) 91-102
16. Cui Z.F., and Wright K.I.T. Gas liquid two phase cross flow ultrafiltration of BSA and dextran solutions. J. Membr. Sci. 90 (1994) 183-189
17. Cheng T.W., Yeh H.M., and Gau C.T. Enhancement of permeate flux by gas slugs for crossflow ultrafiltration in tubular membrane module. Separ. Sci. Technol. 33 (1998) 2295-2309
18. Vera L., Delgado S., and Elmaleh S. Dimensionless numbers for the steady state flux of cross flow microfiltration and ultrafiltration with gas sparging. Chem. Eng. Sci. 55 (2000) 3419-3428
19. K. Watanabe, Y. Fuchigami, Separation of liquid mixtures, EP0294827, 1988.
20. Peters T.A., Fontalvo J., Vorstman M.A.G., and Keurentjes J.T.F. Design directions for composite catalytic hollow fibre membranes for condensation reactions. Chem. Eng. Res. Des. 82 (2004) 220-228
21. Taitel Y., Bornea D., and Duckler A.E. Modelling flow pattern transitions for steady Upward gas-liquid flow in vertical tubes. AIChE J. 26 (1980) 345-354
22. Fernandes R.C., Semiat R., and Duckler A.E. Hydrodynamic model for gas-liquid slug flow in vertical tubes. AIChE J. 29 (1983) 981-989
23. Taha T., and Cui Z.F. CFD modelling of gas sparged ultrafiltration in tubular membranes. J. Membr. Sci. 210 (2002) 13-27
24. Polonsky S., Shemer L., and Barnea D. The relation between the Taylor bubble motion and the velocity field ahead of it. Int. J. Multiphase Flow 25 (1999) 957-975
25. Pinto A.M.F.R., Coelho M.N., and Campos J.B.L. On the interaction of Taylor bubbles rising in two-phase co-current slug flow in vertical columns: turbulent wakes. Exp. Fluids 31 (2001) 643-652
26. Fabre J., and Liné A. Modeling of two-phase slug flow. Ann. Rev. Fluid Mech. 24 (1992) 21-46
27. Collins R., Moraes F.F., Davidson J.F., and Harrison D. The motion of a large gas bubble rising through liquid flowing in a tube. J. Fluid Mech. 89 (1978) 497-514
28. Abdul-Majeed G.H., and Al-Mashat A.M. A mechanistic model for vertical and inclined two phase slug flow. J. Petrol. Sci. Eng. 27 (2000) 59-67
29. Barnea D. Effect of bubble shape on pressure drop calculations in vertical slug flow. Int. J. Multiphase Flow 16 (1990) 79-89
30. Brauner N., and Ullmann A. Modelling of gas entrainment from Taylor bubbles. Part A. Slug flow. Int. J. Multiphase Flow 30 (2004) 239-272
31. G.B. Wallis, One-Dimensional Two Phase Flow, New York, 1969.
32. Yun J., Shen Z., and Ming P. Wall liquid mass transfer for Taylor bubbles rising through liquid in a vertical tube. Chin. J. Chem. Eng. 10 (2002) 404-410
33. E. Flaschel, C. Wandrey, M.R. Kula, in: A. Fiechter (Ed.), Ultrafiltration for the Separation of Biocatalysts, Berlin, 1983, pp. 73-142.
34. Skelland A.H.P. Diffusional Mass Transfer (1974)
35. S. Taylor, R. Krishna, Multicomponent Mass Transfer, John Wiley & Sons, New York, 1993.
36. Krishna R. A generalized film model for mass transfer in non-ideal fluid mixtures. Chem. Eng. Sci. 32 (1977) 659-667
37. Taylor R., and Kooijman H. Composition derivatives of activity coefficient models for estimation of thermodynamic factors in diffusion. Chem. Eng. Commun. 102 (1991) 87-106
38. Mori H., Oda A., Ito C., Aragaki T., and Liu F.Z. Thermodynamic factors derived from group contribution activity coefficient models. J. Chem. Eng. Jpn. 29 (1996) 396-398
39. Li Q.Y., Cui Z.F., and Pepper D.S. Effect of bubble size and frequency on the permeate flux of gas sparged ultrafiltration with tubular membranes. Chem. Eng. J. 67 (1997) 71-75
40. Elshof J.E., Rubio C., Sekulic J., Chowdhury S.R., and Blank D.H.A. Transport mechanisms of water and organic solvents through microporous silica in the pervaporation of binary liquids. Micropor. Mesopor. Mater. 65 (2003) 197-208
41. Verkerk A.W., Male P., Vorstman M.A.G., and Keurentjes J.T.F. Description of dehydration performance of amorphous silica pervaporation membranes. J. Membr. Sci. 193 (2001) 227-238
42. R.H. Perry, D.W. Green, in: R.H. Perry, D.W. Green (Eds.), Chemical Engineers' Handbook, 7th ed., 1999.
43. R.B. Bird, W.E. Stewart, E.N. Lightfoot, Transport Phenomena, 2nd ed., New York, 2002.