Integrating functional synthesis

Artificial Intelligence for Engineering Design, Analysis and Manufacturing: AIEDAM

Volumn 19, Issue 3, 2005, Pages 183-200

  Wood, William H ^a   Dong, Hui ^a   Dym, Clive L ^b,c  

^a Baltimore County   (United States)

^b HARVEY MUDD COLLEGE   (United States)

^c Department of Engineering Design ^*

Author keywords

Case Based Design; Computational Synthesis; Function Based Design; Functional; Synthesis

Indexed keywords

CASE-BASED DESIGN; COMPUTATIONAL SYNTHESIS; FUNCTION-BASED DESIGN; FUNCTIONAL;

COMBINATORIAL MATHEMATICS; COMPUTER SIMULATION; FUNCTIONS; MECHATRONICS; SYNTHESIS (CHEMICAL);

ITERATIVE METHODS;

EID: 33744503680     PISSN: 08900604     EISSN: 14691760     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1017/S0890060405050134     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. Boothroyd, G., Dewhurst, P., & Knight, W. (2001). Product Design for Manufacturing and Assembly, 2nd ed. New York: Marcel Dekker.
2. Chakrabarti, A., & Bligh, T.P. (1994). An approach to functional synthesis of solutions in mechanical conceptual design. Part I: knowledge representation. Research in Engineering Design 6(3), 127-141.
3. Chakrabarti, A., & Bligh, T.P. (1996a). Approach to functional synthesis of solutions in mechanical conceptual design. Part II: kind synthesis. Research in Engineering Design 8(1), 52-62.
4. Chakrabarti, A.. & Bligh, T.P. (1996b). Approach to functional synthesis of solutions in mechanical conceptual design. Part III: spatial configuration. Research in Engineering Design 8(2), 116-124.
5. Chakrabarti, A., & Bligh, T.P. (2001). A scheme for functional reasoning in conceptual design. Design Studies 22, 493-517.
6. Chandrasekaran, B., & Josephson, J.R. (2000). Function in device representation. Engineering with Computers 16, 162-177.
7. Chiou, S.-.I., & Kota, S. (1999). Automated conceptual design of mechanisms. Mechanism and Machine Theory 34, 467-495.
8. Dong, H., & Wood, W. (2004). Integrating computational synthesis and decision-based conceptual design. Proc. ASME 2004 Design Theory and Methodology Conf., Paper No. DETC2004-57481, Salt Lake City, UT.
9. Dym, C.L. (1994a). Engineering Design: A Synthesis of Views. New York: Cambridge University Press.
10. Dym, C.L. (1994b). Representing designed objects: the languages of engineering design. Archives for Computational Methods in Engineering 1(1), 75-108.
11. Dym, C.L., & Brey, P. (2000). Languages of engineering design: Empirical constructs for representing objects and articulating processes. Research in Philosophy and Technology 20, 119-148.
12. Dym, C.L., & Levitt, R.E. (1991). Toward an integrated environment for engineering modeling and computation. Engineering with Computers 7(4), 209-224.
13. Fagade, A., & Kazmer, D. (1999). Optimal component consolidation in molded product design. Proc. ASME 1999 Design for Manufacture Conf., Paper No. DETC1999/DFM-8921, Las Vegas, NV.
14. Gietka, P., Verma, M., & Wood, W.H. (2002). Functional modeling, reverse engineering, and design reuse. Proc. ASME 2002 Design Theory and Methodology Conf., Paper No. DETC2002/DTM-34019, Montreal, Canada.
15. Hauser, J.R., & Clausing, D. (1988). The house of quality. Harvard Business Review May-June, 63-73.
16. Kota, S., & Erdman, A.G. (1997). Motion control in product design. Mechanical Engineering 119(8), 74-76.
17. Kurfman, M.A., Stock, M.E., Stone, R., Rajan, J., & Wood, K. (2003). Experimental studies assessing the repeatability of a functional modeling derivation method. Journal of Mechanical Design 125, 682-693.
18. Leifer, L. Personal communication, 1994.
19. Maher, M.L., & Pu, P. (1997). Issues and Applications of Case-Based Reasoning in Design. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
20. McAdams, D.A., Stone, R.B., & Wood, K.L. (1999). Functional inter-dependence and product similarity based on customer needs. Research in Engineering Design 11(1), 1-19.
21. Navinchandra, D. (1988). Behavioral synthesis in cadet, a case-based design tool. Proc. DARPA Workshop on Case-based Reasoning, pp. 286-301. San Mateo, CA: Morgan-Kaufman.
22. Pahl, G., & Beitz, W. (1988). Engineering Design - A Systematic Approach. New York: Springer-Verlag.
23. Qian, L., & Gero,.T.S. (1996). Function-behavior-structure paths and their role in analogy-based design. Artificial Intelligence for Engineering Design, Analysis and Manufacturing 10(4), 289-312.
24. Raghavan, A., & Stahovich, T.F. (1998). Computing design rationales by interpreting simulations. Proc. ASME 1998 Design Engineering Technical Conf., Paper No. DETC1998/DTM-5662, Atlanta, GA.
25. Reddy, G., & Cagan, J. (1995). Optimally directed truss topology generation using shape annealing. Journal of Mechanical Design 117(1), 206-209.
26. Roth, K. (1987). Design models and design catalogs. Int. Conf. Engineering Design (ICED'87), pp. 60-66.
27. Schmidt, L.C., Shetty, H., & Chase, S. (2000). A graph grammar approach for structure synthesis of mechanisms. Journal of Mechanical Design 122, 371-376.
28. Sharpe, J.E.E., & Bracewell, R.H. (1996). Functional descriptions used in computer support for qualitative scheme generation - "schemebuilder." Artificial Intelligence for Engineering Design, Analysis and Manufacturing 10(5), 333-345.
29. Shea, K., & Cagan, J. (1997). Innovative dome design: applying geodesicpatterns with shape annealing. Artificial Intelligence for Engineering Design, Analysis, and Manufacture 13(3), 241-251.
30. Stone, R.B., & Wood, K.L. (2000). Development of a functional basis for design. Journal of Mechanical Design 122(4), 359-370.
31. Swift, K.G., &. Booker, J.D. (1997). Process Detection from Design to Manufacture. London: Arnold.
32. Takeda, H., Veerkamp, P., Tomiyama, T., & Yoshikawa, H. (1990). Modeling design processes. AI Magazine 11(4), 37-48.
33. Ullman, D.G. (1992a). The Mechanical Design Process. New York: McGraw-Hill.
34. Ullman, D.G. (1992b). A taxonomy for mechanical design. Research in Engineering Design 3.
35. Umeda, Y., Tomiyama, T., Yoshikawa, H., & Shimomura, Y. (1994). Using functional maintenance to improve fault tolerance. IEEE Expert 9(3), 25-31.
36. Verma, M., & Wood, W.H. (2001). Form follows function: case-based learning over product evolution. Proc. ASME 2001 Design Engineering Technical Conf., Paper No. DETC2001/DFM-21182, Pittsburgh, PA.
37. Verma, M., & Wood, W. (2003). Functional modeling: toward a common language for design and reverse engineering. Proc. ASME 2003 Design Theory and Methodology Conf., Paper No. DETC2003/DTM-48660, Chicago.
38. Verma, M., & Wood, W. (2004). Toward case-based functional design: matching reverse engineering practice with the design process. Unpublished manuscript.
39. Wood, W.H., & Agogino, A.M. (2005). Decision-based conceptual design: modeling and navigating heterogeneous design spaces. ASME Journal of Mechanical Design 127(1), 2-11.
40. Yoshikawa, H. (1981). General design theory and a CAD system. Man-Machine Communications in CAD/CAM, Proc. IFIP WG 5.2-5.3 Working Conf. (Computer Aided Design /Computer Aided Manufacturing), pp. 35-58, Tokyo. Amsterdam: North-Holland.