The role of semiochemicals in tritrophic interactions between the spruce bark beetle Ips typographus, its predators and infested spruce

Journal of Applied Entomology

Volumn 130, Issue 5, 2006, Pages 275-283

  Hulcr, J ^a,b   Ubik, K ^c   Vrkoc, J ^c  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH BOHEMIA   (Czech Republic)

^c INSTITUTE OF ORGANIC CHEMISTRY AND BIOCHEMISTRY   (Czech Republic)

Author keywords

Medetera setiventris; Monoterpenes; Pheromones; Semiochemicals; Thanasimus

Indexed keywords

BARK; BEETLE; CHEMICAL COMPOUND; PHEROMONE; PREDATOR; TREE;

CIS; COLEOPTERA; DRYOBALANOPS; IPS TYPOGRAPHUS; MEDETERA; PICEA; PICEA ABIES; SCOLYTINAE; THANASIMUS; THANASIMUS FORMICARIUS;

EID: 33744498398     PISSN: 09312048     EISSN: 14390418     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1439-0418.2006.01069.x     Document Type: Article

References (52)

1. Aukema BH, Dahlsten DL, Raffa KF, 2000. Exploiting behavioral disparities among predators and prey to selectively remove pests: maximizing the ratio of bark beetles to predators removed during semiochemically based trap-out. Environ. Entomol. 29, 651 660.
2. Baier P, Bader R, Rosner S, 1999. Monoterpene content and monoterpene emission of Norway spruce (Picea abies L.) bark in relation to primary attraction of bark beetles (Col., Scolytidae). In: Physiology and genetics of tree-phytophage interactions, Int. Symposium, Gujan, France. Ed. by Lieutier F, Mattson WJ, Wagner MR, Les Colloques de l'INRA 90, 249 259.
3. Bakke A, Kvamme T, 1981. Kairomone response in Thanasimus predators to pheromone components of Ips typographus. J. Chem. Ecol. 7, 305 312.
4. Bakke A, Riege L, 1982. The pheromone of the spruce bark beetle Ips typographus and its potential use in the suppression of beetle populations. In: Insect suppression with controlled release pheromone systems. Ed. by Kydoneius AF, Beroza M, CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL, 3 17.
5. Beaver RA, 1965. Some mortality factors affecting a population of Scolytus scolytus (F.) (Coleoptera; Scolytidae). Proc. XII Int. Congr. Ent., London, UK, 694.
6. Berryman AA, 1967. Preservation and augmentation of insect predators of the western pine beetle. J. Forest. 67, 260 262.
7. Bickel DJ, 1987. A revision of the Oriental and Australasian Medetera (Diptera: Dolichopodidae). Rec. Austr. Museum 39, 195 259.
8. Birgersson G, Schlyter F, Löfqvist J, Bergström G, 1984. Quantitative variation of pheromone components in the spruce bark beetle Ips typographus from different attack phases. J. Chem. Ecol. 10, 1029 1055.
9. Byers JA, 1989. Behavioral mechanisms involved in reducing competition in bark beetles. HolarcticEcol 12, 466 467.
10. Charlwood BV, Banthorpe DV, 1991. Methods in plant biochemistry, vol. 7. Terpenoids. Academic Press Ltd., San Diego, CA.
11. Coulson RN, 1979. Population dynamics of bark beetles. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 24, 417 447.
12. Fielding NJ, Evans HF, 1997. Biological control of Dendroctonus micans (Scolytidae) in Great Britain. Biocontr. News Inform. 18, 51 60.
13. Fitzgerald TD, Nagel WP, 1972. Oviposition and larval bark-surface orientation of Medetera aldrichii (Diptera: Dolichopodidae): response to a prey-liberated plant terpene. Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am. 65, 328 330.
14. Hansen K, 1983. Reception of bark beetle pheromone in the predaceous clerid beetle Thanasimus formicarius (Coleoptera., Cleridae). J. Comp. Physiol. 150, 371 378.
15. Hulcr J, Pollet M, Ubik K, Vrkoc J, 2005. Exploitation of kairomones and synomones by Medetera spp., (Diptera: Dolichopodidae) predators of the spruce bark beetles. Eur. J. Entomol. 102, 655 662.
16. Ikeda T, Enda N, Yamane A, Oda K, Toyoda T, 1980. Attractants for the Japanese pine sawyer, Monochamus alternatus Hope (Coleoptera, Cerambycidae). Appl. Entomol. Zool. 15, 358 361.
17. Jakus R, 1988. Patch level variation on bark beetle attack (Col., Scolytidae) on snapped and uprooted trees in Norway spruce primeval natural forest in endemic conditions: species distribution. J. Appl. Ent. 122, 65 70.
18. Janson W, 1993. Monoterpene emissions from Scots pine and Norwegian spruce. J. Geophys. Res. 98, 2839 2850.
19. Klimetzek D, Kohler J, Vite JP, Kohnle U, 1986. Dosage response to ethanol mediates host selection by secondary bark beetles. Naturwissenschaften 73, 270 272.
20. Kolubajiv S, 1958. Umely chov hmyzich nepratel lykozrouta smrkoveho [Artificial rearing of the spruce bark beetles enemies]. Vedecke prace Vyzk. ustavu lesa a myslivosti [Research papers of the Institute of Forestry and Game management], Zbraslav.
21. Kydonieus AF, Beroza M, 1982. Insect suppression with controlled release pheromone systems, Vol. 2. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL.
22. Langewald J, 1989. Studies on the habitat selection of the bark beetle predator Thanasimus formicarius. Anz. Schadlingsde. Pflanzenschutz, Umweltschutz 62, 88 90.
23. Lawson SA, Morgan FD, 1992. Rearing of two predators, Thanasimus dubius and Temnochila virescens, for biological control of Ips grandicollis in Australia. Entomol. Exp. Appl. 65, 225 233.
24. Lawson SA, Furuta K, Katagiri K, 1997. Effect of natural enemy exclusion of Ips typographus japonicus Niijima (Col., Scolytidae). J. Appl. Ent. 121, 89 98.
25. Leps J, 1996. Biostatistika. Faculty of Biological Sciences, University of South Bohemia, Ceske Budejovice.
26. Lindstrom M, Norin T, Birgersson G, Schlyter F, 1989. Variation of enantiomeric composition of -pinene in Norway spruce Picea abies, and its influence on the production of verbenol isomers by Ips typographus in the field. J. Chem. Ecol. 15, 541 548.
27. Miller DR, Borden JH, 1990. Beta-phellandrene, kairomone for pine engraver, Ips pini (Say) (Coleoptera, Scolytidae). J. Chem. Ecol. 16, 2519 2531.
28. Mills NJ, 1983. The natural enemies of scolytids infesting conifers in Europe in relation to the biological control of Dendroctonus spp. in Canada. Biocontr. News Info 4, 305 328.
29. Mills NJ, 1985. Some observations on the role of predation in the natural regulation of Ips typographus populations. J. Appl. Ent. 99, 209 215.
30. Nuorteva M, 1956. Über den Fichtenstamm-Bastkäfer, Hylurgops palliatus, und seine Insektfeinde. Acta Entomol. Fenn. 13, 1 118.
31. Ounap H, 2001. Insect predators and parasitoids of bark beetles (Col., Scolytidae) in Estonia. Institute of Plant Protection, Faculty of Agronomy, Estonian Agricultural University, Estonia.
32. Paine TD, Raffa KF, Harrington TC, 1997. Interactions among scolytid bark beetles, their associated fungi, and live host conifers. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 42, 179 206.
33. Pennak RW, 1964. Collegiate dictionary of zoology. Ronald Press, New York.
34. Persson M, Sjodin K, Borg-Karlson AK, Norin T, Ekberg I, 1996. Relative amounts and enantiomeric compositions of monoterpene hydrocarbons in xylem and needles of Picea abies. Phytochemistry 42, 1289 1297.
35. Pettersson EM, 2001. Volatile attractants for three pteromalid parasitoids attacking concealed spruce bark beetles. Chemoecology 11, 89 95.
36. Pettersson E, Boland W, 2003. Potential parasitoid attractants, volatile composition throughout a bark beetle attack. Chemoecology 13, 27 37.
37. Raffa KF, Havill NP, Nordheim EV, 2002. How many choices can your test animal compare effectively? Evaluating a critical assumption of behavioral preference tests. Oecologia 133, 422 429.
38. Reddemann J, Schopf R, 1996. The importance of monoterpenes in the aggregation of the spruce bark beetle Ips typographus (Coleoptera: Scolytidae: Ipinae). Entomol. Gen. 21, 69 80.
39. Rudinsky JA, Novák V, Svihra P, 1971. Attraction of the bark beetle Ips typographus to terpenes and male produced pheromone. J. Appl. Ent. 67, 179 188.
40. Schlyter F, Byers JA, Lofqvist J, 1987. Attraction to pheromone sources of different quantity, quality, and spacing - density-regulation mechanisms in bark beetle Ips typographus. J. Chem. Ecol. 13, 1503 1523.
41. Schlyter F, Birgersson G, Leufvén A, 1989. Inhibition of the attraction to the aggregation pheromone by verbenone and ipsenol: density regulation mechanisms in bark beetle Ips typographus. J. Chem. Ecol. 15, 2263 2277.
42. Seybold SJ, Tittiger C, 2003. Biochemistry and molecular biology of de novo isoprenid phermone production in the Scolytidae. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 48, 425 453.
43. Seybold SJ, Quilici DR, Tillman JA, Vanderwel D, Wood DL, Blomquist GJ, 1995. De-novo biosynthesis of the aggregation pheromone components ipsenol and ipsdienol by the pine bark beetles Ips paraconfusus Lanier and Ips pini (Say) (Coleoptera-Scolytidae). Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA 92, 8393 8397.
44. Strom BL, Roton LM, Goyer RA, Meeker JR, 1999. Visual and semiochemical disruption of host finding in the southern pine beetle. Ecol. Appl. 9, 1028 1038.
45. Tommeras BA, 1988. The clerid beetle, Thanasimus formicarius, is attracted to the pheromone of the ambrosia beetle, Trypodendron lineatum. Experientia 44, 536 537.
46. Wallin KF, Raffa KF, 2002. Density-mediated responses of bark beetles to host allelochemicals: a link between individual behaviour and population dynamics. Ecol. Entomol. 27, 484 492.
47. Wermelinger B, 2002. Development and distribution of predators and parasitoids during two consecutive years of an Ips typographus (Col., Scolytidae) infestation. J. Appl. Ent. 126, 521 527.
48. Weslien J, 1994. Interactions within and between specie at different densities of the bark beetle Ips typographus and its predator Thanasimus formicarius. Entomol. Exp. Appl. 71, 133 143.
49. Williamson DL, 1971. Olfactory discernment of prey by Medetera bistriata (Diptera, Dolichopodidae). Ann. Entomol. Soc. Am. 64, 586 589.
50. Wood DL, 1982. The role of pheromones, kairomones, and allomones in the host selection and colonization behavior of bark beetles. Annu. Rev. Entomol. 27, 411 446.
51. Zondag R, 1979. Breeding of the clerid Thanasimus formicarius for the control of the bark beetles Hylastes ater and Hylurgops ligniperda in New Zealand. N Z J. For. Sci. 9, 125 132.
52. Zumr V, 1988. The effectiveness of the aggregation pheromone chalcoprax in the control of spruce wood engraver Pityogenes chalcographus L. (Coleoptera, Scolytidae). Lesnictvi 34, 489 498.