Development of design methodology for upgradable products based on function-behavior-state modeling

Artificial Intelligence for Engineering Design, Analysis and Manufacturing: AIEDAM

Volumn 19, Issue 3, 2005, Pages 161-182

  Umeda, Yasushi ^a   Kondoh, Sinsuke ^b   Shimomura, Yoshiki ^c   Tomiyama, Tetsuo ^d  

^a OSAKA UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

^b Nara Institute of Science and Technology   (Japan)

^c TOKYO METROPOLITAN UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

^d DELFT UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Netherlands)

Author keywords

Design Methodology; Environmentally Conscious Design; Function Behavior State Modeling; Upgrade Design; Vacuum Cleaner

Indexed keywords

DESIGN METHODOLOGY; ENVIRONMENTALLY CONSCIOUS DESIGN; FUNCTION-BEHAVIOR-STATE MODELING; UPGRADE DESIGN; VACUUM CLEANER;

ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACT; FUNCTIONS; PERFORMANCE; PRODUCT DESIGN; VACUUM;

PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT;

EID: 33744484025     PISSN: 08900604     EISSN: 14691760     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1017/S0890060405050122     Document Type: Article

References (37)

1. Bracewell, R.H., & Sharpe, J.E.E. (1996). Functional descriptions used in computer support for qualitative scheme generation - Schemebuilder. Artificial Intelligence for Engineering Design, Analysis and Manufacturing 10(4), 333-346.
2. Chakrabarti, A., & Bligh, T.P. (2001). A scheme for functional reasoning in mechanical conceptual design. Design Studies 22(6), 493-517.
3. Daimon, T., Kondoh, S., & Umeda, Y. (2004). Proposal of decision support method for life cycle strategy by estimating value and physical lifetimes. Proc. 11th Int. CIRP Life Cycle Engineering Seminar, pp. 49-56.
4. Finch, W.W., & Ward, A.C. (1995). Generalized set-propagation operations over relations of more than three variables. Artificial Intelligence for Engineering Design, Analysis and Manufacturing 9(3), 231-242.
5. Forbus, K. (1984). Qualitative process theory. Artificial Intelligence 24(3), 85-168.
6. Fujimoto, J., Umeda, Y., Tamura, T., Tomiyama, T., & Kimura, F. (2003). Development of service-oriented products based on the inverse manufacturing concept. Environmental Science & Technology 37(23), 5398-5406.
7. Fujita, K., Akagi, S., Yoneda, T., & Ishikawa, M. (1998). Simultaneous optimization of product family sharing system structure and configuration. Proc. ASME 1998 Design Engineering Technical Conf., Paper No. DETC98/DFM-5722.
8. Fujita, K., Sakaguchi, H., & Akagi, S. (1999). Product variety development and its optimization under modular architecture and module commonization. Proc. ASME 1999 Design Engineering Technical Conf., Paper No. DETC99/DFM-8923.
9. Fujita, K. (2002). Product variety optimization under modular architecture. Computer-Aided Design 34(12), 953-965.
10. Gero, J.S., & Kannengiesser, U. (2004). The situated function-behaviour-structure framework. Design Studies 25(4), 373-391.
11. Hiroshige, Y., Nishi, T., & Ohashi, T. (2001). Recyclability evaluation method (REM) and its application. Proc. EcoDesign 2001, pp. 315-320. Los Alamitos, CA: IEEE Computer Society.
12. Ishii, K. (1999). Incorporating end-of-life strategy in product definition. Proc. EcoDesign '99, pp. 364-369. Los Alamitos, CA: IEEE Computer Society.
13. Johnson, M.E., & Anderson, E. (2000). Postponement strategies for channel derivatives. International Journal of Logistics Management 11(1), 19-35.
14. Jovane, F., & Alting, L. (1993). A key issue in product life cycle: disassembly. Annals of CIRP'93 42(2), 651-658.
15. Kobayashi, H. (2001). Life cycle planning for strategic evolution of ecoproducts. Proc. 12th Int. Conf. Engineering Design (ICED01), pp. 757-763.
16. Li, H., & Azarm, S. (2002). An approach for product line design selection under uncertainty and competition. Journal of Mechanical Design 124, 385-392.
17. Martin, M.V., & Ishii, K. (2002). Design for variety: Developing standardized and modularized product platform architectures. Research in Engineering Design 13(4), 213-235.
18. Matsuda, A., Shimomura, Y., Kondoh, S., & Umeda, Y. (2003). Upgrade planning for upgradable product design. Proc. EcoDesign 2003, pp. 231-234. Los Alamitos, CA: IEEE Computer Society.
19. Messac, A., Martinez, M. P., & Simpson, T. W. (2002). Introduction of a product family penalty function using physical programming. Journal of Mechanical Design 124, 164-172.
20. Nakamura, S., & Kondoh, Y. (2001). Waste input-output analysis of disposal, recycling, and extended life of electric home appliances. Proc. EcoDesign 2001, pp. 814-819. Los Alamitos, CA: IEEE Computer Society.
21. Prabhakar, S., & Goel, A.K. (1998). Functional modeling for enabling adaptive design of devices for new environments. Artificial Intelligence in Engineering 12(4), 417-444.
22. Qian, L., & Gero, J.S. (1996). Function-behavior-structure paths and their role in analogy-based design. Artificial Intelligence for Engineering Design, Analysis and Manufacturing 10(4), 289-312.
23. Sembugamoorthy, V., & Chandrasekaran, B. (1986). Functional representation of devices and compilation of diagnostic problem-solving systems. In Experience, Memory, and Reasoning (Riesbeck, C.K., Ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
24. Simpson, T. W., Maier, J.R.A., & Mistree, F. (2001). Product platform design: method and application. Research in Engineering Design 13(1), 2-22.
25. Suh, N.P. (1990). The Principles of Design. New York: Oxford University Press.
26. Suwa, M., Gero, J.S., & Purcell, T. (1999). Unexpected discoveries and s-inventions of design requirements: a key to creative designs. In Computational Models of Creative Design IV (Gero, J.S., & Maher, M.L., Eds.), pp. 297-320. Sydney, Australia: Key Centre of Design Computing and Cognition, University of Sydney.
27. Tomiyama, T. (1997). A manufacturing paradigm toward the 21st century. Integrated Computer Aided Engineering 4, 159-178.
28. Tomiyama, T., Kiriyama, T., & Yoshikawa, H. (1992). Conceptual design of mechanisms: A qualitative physics approach. In Concurrent Engineering: Automation, Tools, and Techniques (Kusiak, A., Ed.), pp. 131-152, New York: Wiley.
29. Ulrich, K.T. (1995). The role of product architecture in the manufacturing firm. Research Policy 24, 419-440.
30. Umeda, Y., Hijihara, K., Oono, M., Ogawa, Y., Kobayashi, H., Hattori, M., Masui, K., & Fukano, A. (2003). Proposal of life cycle design support method using disposal cause analysis matrix. Proc. 14th Int. Conf. Engineering Design (ICED03).
31. Umeda, Y., Ishii, M., Yoshioka, M., & Tomiyama, T. (1996). Supporting conceptual design based on the function-behavior-state modeler. Artificial Intelligence for Engineering Design, Analysis and Manufacturing 10(4), 275-288.
32. Umeda, Y., Nonomura, A., & Tomiyama, T. (2000). Study on life-cycle design for the post mass production paradigm. Artificial Intelligence for Engineering Design, Analysis and Manufacturing 14(2), 149-161.
33. Umeda, Y., Shimomura, Y., Yoshioka, M., & Tomiyama, T. (1999). A proposal of design methodology for upgradable products. Proc. ASME 1999 Design Engineering Technical Conf., Paper No. DETC99/DFM-8969.
34. Umeda, Y., Takeda, H., Tomiyama, T., & Yoshikawa, H. (1990). Function, behaviour, and structure. In Applications of Artificial Intelligence in Engineering V (Gero, J.S., Ed.), pp. 177-193. Southampton/Berlin: Computational Mechanics Publications/Springer-Verlag.
35. Umeda, Y., & Tomiyama, T. (1997). Functional reasoning in design. IEEE Expert: Intelligent Systems and Their Applications 12(2), 42-48.
36. Umemori, Y., Kondoh, S., Umeda, Y., Shimomura, Y., & Yoshioka, M. (2001). Design for upgradable products considering future uncertainty. Proc. EcoDesign 2001, pp. 87-92. Los Alamitos, CA: IEEE Computer Society.
37. Yoshioka, M., Umeda, Y., Takeda, H., Shimomura, Y., Nomaguchi, Y. & Tomiyama, T. (2004). Physical concept ontology for the knowledge intensive engineering framework. Advanced Engineering Informatics 18, 95-113.