The INFVo perceptual rating scale for substitution voicing: Development and reliability

European Archives of Oto-Rhino-Laryngology

Volumn 263, Issue 5, 2006, Pages 435-439

  Moerman, Mieke ^a,e   Martens, Jean Pierre ^b   Crevier Buchman, Lise ^c   De Haan, Else ^a   Grand, Stephanie ^d   Tessier, Christophe ^c   Woisard, Virginie ^d   Dejonckere, Philippe ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CENTER UTRECHT   (Netherlands)

^b GHENT UNIVERSITY   (Belgium)

^c HÔPITAL EUROPÉEN GEORGES POMPIDOU   (France)

^d SERVICE DE PNEUMOLOGIE   (France)

^e NONE   (Belgium)

Author keywords

GRBAS; INFVo; Perception; Substitution voicing; Voice assessment

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; DYSPHONIA; INFVO RATING SCALE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SCORING SYSTEM; SPEECH INTELLIGIBILITY; SPEECH PERCEPTION; SPEECH REHABILITATION; SUBSTITUTION VOICING; VISUAL ANALOG SCALE; VOICE;

HUMANS; OBSERVER VARIATION; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SPEECH; SPEECH INTELLIGIBILITY; SPEECH, ALARYNGEAL; VOICE; VOICE DISORDERS; VOICE QUALITY;

EID: 33744478672     PISSN: 09374477     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00405-005-1033-z     Document Type: Article

References (14)

1. Moerman M, Pieters G, Martens JP, Van der Borgt MJ, Dejonckere P (2004) Objective evaluation of quality of substitution voices. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 261:541-547 (Epub 2004 Jan 15)
2. Remacle M, Eckel HE, Antonelli A, Brasnu D, Chevalier D, Friederich G, Olofsson J, Rudert HH, Thumfart W, de Vincentiis M, Wustrow TP (2000) Endoscopic cordectomy. A proposal for a classification by the Working Committee, European Laryngological Society. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 257:227-231
3. Dejonckere PH, Obbens C, de Moor GM, Wieneke GH (1993) Perceptual evaluation of dysphonia: reliability and relevance. Folia Phoniatrica 454:76-83
4. Pindzola RH, Cain BH, Auburn AL (1988) Acceptability ratings of tracheo-esophageal speech. Laryngoscope 98:394-397
5. Blom ED, Singer MI, Hamaker RS (1986) A prospective study of tracheoesophageal speech. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 112:440-447
6. Cullinan WL, Brown CS, Blalock PD (1986) Ratings of intelligibility of esophageal and tracheoesophageal speech. J Commun Disord 19:185-195
7. Williams SE, Scanio TS, Ritterman SI (1989) Temporal and perceptual chracteristics of tracheoesophageal voice. Laryngoscope 99:846-850
8. Robbins J, Fisher HB, Blom E, Singer MI (1984) A comparative acoustic study of normal, esophageal and tracheo-esophageal speech production. J Speech Hear Disord 49:202-210
9. Deschler DG, Doherty ET, Reed CG, Anthony JP, Singer MI (1994) Tracheoesophageal voice following tubed free radial forearm flap reconstruction of the neopharynx. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 103:929-936
10. Moerman MBJ, Martens JP, Van der Borgt MJ, Peleman M, Gillis M, Dejonckere PH (2005) Perceptual evaluation of substitution voices: development and evaluation of the (I)INFVo rating scale. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol (accepted)
11. Vlaminck H, Maes B, Jacobs A, Reyntjens S, Evers G (2001) The dialysis diet and fluid non-adherence questionnaire: validity testing of a self-report instrument for clinical practice. Information point: Kendall's tau. J Clin Nursing 10:707-715
12. Conover WJ (1980) Practical non-parametric statistics, 2nd edn. John Wiley and Sons, New York
13. Webb AL, Carding PN, Deary IJ, Mc Kenzie K, Steen N, Wilson JA (2004) The reliability of three perceptual evaluation scales for dysphonia. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 261:429-434
14. Most T, Tobin Y, Mimran RC (2000) Acoustic and perceptual characteristics of esophageal and tracheoesophageal speech production. J Commun Disord 33:165-180