Auditory P300 differences between healthy and schizophrenic subjects revealed by single trial analysis

2nd International IEEE EMBS Conference on Neural Engineering

Volumn 2005, Issue , 2005, Pages 577-578

  Bonala, Bharat ^a   Kota, Prashant ^a   Sundaresan, Karthik ^a   Boutros, Nashaat N ^b   Jansen, Ben H ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF HOUSTON   (United States)

^b YALE UNIVERSITY SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

Evoked potentials; P300; Schizophrenia; Single trial analysis

Indexed keywords

P300; SCHIZOPHRENIA; SINGLE TRIAL ANALYSIS;

BIOELECTRIC POTENTIALS; PARAMETER ESTIMATION; PATTERN RECOGNITION;

BIOMEDICAL ENGINEERING;

EID: 33744478631     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1109/CNE.2005.1419689     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (6)

1. Ford JM, Roth WT, Pfefferbaum A. P3 and schizophrenia. In Friedman D, Bruder G (eds), Psychophysiology and Experimental Psychopathology: A Tribute to Sam Sutton. New York: New York Academy of Sciences, pp 146-162, 1992.
2. Ford JM, White P, Lim KO, Pfefferbaum A. Schizophrenics have fewer and smaller P300s: a single trial analysis. Biol Psychiatry 1994;35:96-103.
3. Garoosi V, Jansen BH. Development and evaluation of the Piecewise Prony method for evoked potential analysis. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 2000;47(12):1549 - 1554.
4. McCarthy G, Donchin E. A metric for thought: a comparison of P300 latency and reaction time. Science 1981;211(4477):77-80.
5. Spehlmann R. Evoked Potential Primer, Stoneham, MA: Butterworth Publishers, 1985.
6. Sutton S, Braren M, Zubin J, John ER. Evoked-potential correlates of stimulus uncertainty. Science 1965;150(3700):1187-1188.