Property rights, the first amendment, and judicial anti-urbanism: The strange case of Virginia V. Hicks

Urban Geography

Volumn 26, Issue 7, 2005, Pages 565-586

  Mitchell, Don ^a  

^a SYRACUSE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Law; Private property; Property rights; Public housing; Urbanism

Indexed keywords

PRIVATE LAND; PROPERTY RIGHTS;

EID: 33744476946     PISSN: 02723638     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2747/0272-3638.26.7.565     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. Blomley, N., 2000, "Acts," "deeds," and the violences of property. Historical Geography, Vol. 28, 86-107.
2. Blomley, N., 2004, Unsettling the City: Urban Land and the Politics of Property. New York, NY: Routledge.
3. Clark, G., 1990, The virtues of location: Do property rights "trump" workers' rights to self-organization? Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, Vol. 8, 53-72.
4. Dworkin, R., 1978, Taking Rights Seriously. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
5. LeFebvre, H., 1996, The right to the city. In E. Kofman and E. Lebas, editors and translators, Writings on Cities. Oxford, UK: Blackwell, 63-181.
6. Lefebvre, H., 2003, The Urban Revolution. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press. Translated by R. Bononno.
7. Low, S., 2003, Behind the Gates: Life, Security, and the Pursuit of Happiness in Fortress America. New York, NY: Routledge.
8. MacPherson, C., 1978, Property: Mainstream and Critical Positions. Toronto, Ontario, Canada: University of Toronto Press.
9. Mitchell, D., 1996, Political violence, order, and the legal construction of public space: Power and the public forum doctrine. Urban Geography, Vol. 17, 158-178.
10. Mitchell, D., 2003, The Right to the City: Social Justice and the Fight for Public Space. New York, NY: Guilford.
11. Mitchell, D., 2005, The S.U.V. model of citizenship: Floating bubbles, buffer zones, and the rise of the "purely atomic" individual. Political Geography, Vol. 24, 77-100.
12. Mitchell, D. and Staeheli, L. (2005a), Permitting protest: Constructing - and dismantling - the geography of dissent in the United States. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, Vol. 29, 796-813.
13. Mitchell, D. and Staeheli, L., 2005b, Turning social relations into space: Property, law, and the plaza of Santa Fe, New Mexico. Landscape Research, Vol. 30, No. 3, 361-378
14. New York Times, 2003, A Trio of Good Rulings. June 17, p. 26.
15. Note, 2003, The Supreme Court, 2002 Term: Leading cases: I. Constitutional law: 3. Trespass policies. Harvard Law Review, Vol. 117, 359-369.
16. San Diego Union-Tribune, 2004, Civic innovation: Padres writing rules for public/private park. January 11, p. G-2.
17. Simon, H., 1995, The criminalization of homelessness in Santa Ana, California: A case study. Clearinghouse Review, Vol. 29, 725-729.
18. Sjoblom, R., 2004, Casenote: Enforcing the public forum doctrine on private property: First Unitarian Church of Salt Lake City v. Salt Lake City Corporation. San Diego Law Review, Vol. 41, 447-482.
19. Tushnet, M., 1984, An essay on rights. Texas Law Review, Vol. 62, 1363-1412.
20. Waldron, J., editor, 1993, Homelessness and the issue of freedom. In Liberal Rights: Collected Papers 1981-1991. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 309-338.
21. Young, I., 1990, Justice and the Politics of Difference. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.