Selective separation of cationic peptides from a tryptic hydrolysate of β-lactoglobulin by electrofiltration

Biotechnology and Bioengineering

Volumn 94, Issue 2, 2006, Pages 223-233

  Lapointe, Jean François ^a   Gauthier, Sylvie F ^a   Pouliot, Yves ^a   Bouchard, Christian ^a  

^a UNIVERSITÉ LAVAL   (Canada)

Author keywords

lactoglobulin; Bioactive whey peptides; Electrofiltration; Membrane selectivity; Nanofiltration; Peptide fractionation

Indexed keywords

DAIRY PRODUCTS; ELECTRIC FIELD EFFECTS; FILTRATION; HYDROLYSIS; ION SELECTIVE MEMBRANES; PH EFFECTS;

Β-LACTOGLOBULIN; BIOACTIVE WHEY PEPTIDES; ELECTROFILTRATION; MEMBRANE SELECTIVITY; PEPTIDE FRACTIONATION;

PROTEINS;

BETA LACTOGLOBULIN; PEPTIDE; PROTEIN HYDROLYSATE;

ARTICLE; CATION TRANSPORT; ELECTRIC FIELD; ELECTROLYSIS; FILTRATION; FRACTIONATION; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; MEMBRANE POTENTIAL; NANOFILTRATION; PEPTIDE ANALYSIS; PH MEASUREMENT; PRESSURE; PROTEIN ISOLATION; SEPARATION TECHNIQUE; THERMODYNAMICS; VELOCITY; WATER PERMEABILITY;

CATIONS; CHEMICAL FRACTIONATION; HYDROGEN-ION CONCENTRATION; LACTOGLOBULINS; MILK PROTEINS; PEPTIDE FRAGMENTS; PROTEIN HYDROLYSATES; TRYPSIN;

EID: 33744472187     PISSN: 00063592     EISSN: 10970290     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/bit.20799     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Adler-Nissen J. 1977. Enzymic hydrolysis of food proteins. Proc Biochem 12:18-24.
2. Afonso MD, Hagmeyer G, Gimbel R. 2001. Streaming potential measurements to assess the variation of nanofiltration membranes surface charge with the concentration of salt solutions. Separ Purif Technol 22-23:529-541.
3. Bargeman G, Dohmen-Speelmans M, Timmer M, Van der Horst C. 2000. Selective isolation of cationic amino acids and peptides by electromembrane filtration. Lait 80:175-185.
4. s2-casein hydrolysate. Biotech Bioeng 80:599-609.
5. Bowen WR. 1992. Design of electrically enhanced membrane separation processes. In: Williams RA, editor. Colloid and surface Engineering. Applications in the process industries. Oxford: Butterwoth-Heinemann. p 215-247.
6. Cheryan M. 1998. Ultrafiltration and microfiltration hanbook. Lancaster: Technomic Publishing Company.
7. Daufin G, Kerhervé FL, Aimar P, Mollé D. Léonil J, Nau F. 1995. Electrofiltration of solutions of amino acids or peptides. Lait 75:105-115.
8. Fitzgerald J, Meisel H. 2000. Milk derived peptide inhibitors of angiotensin-I-converting enzyme. Brit J Nutr 2000:33-37.
9. Groleau P-E, Gauthier SF, Pouliot Y. 2003. Effect of residual chymotryptic activity in a trypsin preparation on peptide aggregation in a β-lactoglobulin hydrolysate. Int Dairy J 13:887-895.
10. Henry JD Jr, Lawler LF, Kuo CHA. 1977. A solid/liquid separation process based on cross flow and electrofiltration. Am Inst Chem Eng J 23:851-859.
11. Huotari HM. 1999. Crossflow membrane filtration enhanced by an external DC electric field: A review. Trans IChemE Part A 77:461-468.
12. Hwang S-T, Kammermeyer K. 1975. Membranes in separations. New York: Wiley-Interscience.
13. International Dairy Federation (IDF) Standard 185/ISO 14891. 2002. Milk and milk products-Determination of nitrogen content. Brussels. Belgium.
14. Iritani E, Katsuhisa O, Murase T. 1992. Analysis of filtration mechanism of dead-end electro-ultrafiltration for proteinaceaous solutions. J Chem Eng Jpn 25:383-388.
15. Iritani E, Mukai Y, Kiyotomo Y. 2000. Effects of electric field on dynamic behaviors of dead-end inclined and downward ultrafiltration of protein solution. J Membrane Sci 164:51-57.
16. Lapointe J-F. Gauthier SF, Pouliot Y, Bouchard CR. 2004a. Fouling of a nanofiltration membrane by a β-lactoglobulin tryptic hydrolysate: Impact on the membrane sieving and electrostatic properties. J Membrane Sci 2005(253):89-102.
17. Lapointe J-F, Gauthier SF, Pouliot Y, Bouchard CR. 2004b. Characterization of interactions between β-lactoglobulin tryptic peptides and a nanofiltration membrane: Impact on the surface membrane properties as determined by contact angle measurement. J Membrane Sci 2005(261):36-48.
18. Lentsh S, Aimar P, Orozco JL. 1993. Enhanced separation of albumin-poly(ethylene glycol) by combination of ultrafiltration and electrophoresis. J Membrane Sci 80:221-232.
19. Mullaly MM, Meisel H, Fitzgerald RJ. 1997. Identification of a novel angiotensin-I-converting enzyme inhibitory peptide corresponding to a tryptic fragment of bovine b-lactoglobulin. FEBS Letters 402:99-101.
20. Radovich JM, Mason NS, Sparks RE. 1980. Coupling electrophoresis with ultrafiltration for improved processing of plasma proteins. Separ Sci Technol 18:1491-1498.
21. Radovich JM, Behnam B, Mullon C. 1985. Steady-state modeling of electroultrafiltration at constant concentration. Separ Sci Technol 20:315-329.
22. Robinson CW, Siegel MH, Condemine A, Fee C, Fahidy TZ, Glick BR. 1993. Pulsed-electric field crossflow ultrafiltration of bovine serum albumin. J Membrane Sci 80:209-220.
23. Shim Y, Lee H-J, Lee S, Moon S-H, Cho J. 2002. Effects of natural organic matter and ionic species on membrane surface charge. Environ Sci Technol 36:3864-3871.
24. Tsuru T, Shutou T, Nakao S-I, Kimura S. 1994. Peptide and amino acid separation with Nanofiltration membranes. Separ Sci Technol 29:971-984.
25. Zumbush PV, Kulcke W, Brunner G. 1998. Use of alternating electrical fields as anti-fouling strategy during ultrafiltration of biological suspensions-Introduction of a new experimental procedure for crossflow filtration. J Membrane Sci 142:75-86.