Availability of services for women in outpatient substance abuse treatment: 1995-2000

Journal of Behavioral Health Services and Research

Volumn 33, Issue 1, 2006, Pages 1-19

  Campbell, Cynthia I ^a,b   Alexander, Jeffrey A ^c  

^a DIVISION OF RESEARCH   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADOPTION; ARTICLE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; DRUG DEPENDENCE TREATMENT; FEMALE; HEALTH CARE AVAILABILITY; HEALTH CARE ORGANIZATION; HEALTH SERVICE; HUMAN; MANAGED CARE ORGANIZATION; OUTPATIENT CARE; REPRODUCTIVE HEALTH; SOCIAL WORK; TIME SERIES ANALYSIS; WOMEN'S HEALTH; AMBULATORY CARE; HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH; REPRODUCTION; UNITED STATES;

AMBULATORY CARE; FEMALE; HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH; HUMANS; REPRODUCTIVE MEDICINE; SOCIAL WORK; SUBSTANCE ABUSE TREATMENT CENTERS; UNITED STATES;

EID: 33744455742     PISSN: 10943412     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11414-005-9002-2     Document Type: Article

References (32)

1. Office of Applied Studies. Results from the 2003 National Survey on Drug Use and Health: National Findings. (DHHS Publication No. SMA 04-3964, NSDUH Series H-25). Rockville, MD: Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration; 2004.
2. Blume SB. Chemical dependency in women: important issues. American Journal of Drug and Alcohol Abuse. 1990;16(3-4):297-307.
3. Finkelstein N. Treatment issues for alcohol- and drug-dependent pregnant and parenting women. Health and Social Work. 1994;19(1):7-15.
4. Kandel DB, Warner LA, Kessler RC. The epidemiology of substance use and dependence among women. In: Wetherington CL, Roman AB, eds. Drug Addiction Research and the Health of Women. Rockville, MD: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, National Institute of Drug Abuse; 1998:105-130.
5. Greenfield SF. Women and alcohol use disorders. Harvard Review of Psychiatry. 2002;10(2):76-85.
6. Office of Applied Studies. The NSDUH Report. Gender differences in substance dependence and abuse. Rockville, MD: Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration; 2004.
7. Office of Applied Studies. Substance use among women in the United States. DHHS Pub. No. (SMA)97-3162. Rockville, MD: Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration; Sep 1997.
8. Grella CE, Joshi V, Hser Y-I. Program variation in treatment outcomes among women in residential drug treatment. Evaluation Review. 2000;24(4):364-383.
9. Marsh JC, D'Aunno TA, Smith BD. Increasing access and providing social services to improve drug abuse treatment for women with children. Addiction. 2000;95(8):1237-1247.
10. Reed BG, Mowbray CT. Mental illness and substance abuse: implications for women's health and health care access. Journal of the American Medical Women's Association. 1999;54(2):71-78.
11. Finkelstein N. Using the relational model as a context for treating pregnant and parenting chemically-dependent women. In: Underhill BL, Finnegan DG, eds. Chemical Dependency: Women at Risk. New York: The Hawthorne Press; 1996:23-44.
12. Marsh JC, Cao D, D'Aunno TA. Gender differences in the impact of comprehensive services in substance abuse treatment. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment. 2004;27:289-300.
13. Howell E, Heiser N, Harrington M. A review of recent findings on substance abuse treatment for pregnant women. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment. 1999;16(3):195-219.
14. Ashley OS, Marsden ME, Brady TM. Effectiveness of substance abuse treatment programming for women: a review. American Journal of Drug and Alcohol Abuse. 2003;29(1):19-53.
15. Soman LA, Brindis C, Dunn-Malhotra E. The interplay of national, state, and local policy in financing care for drug-affected women and children in California. Journal of Psychoactive Drugs. 1996;28(1):3-15.
16. Chavkin W, Breitbart V, Elman D, et al. National survey of the states: policies and practices regarding drug-using pregnant women. American Journal of Public Health. 1998;88(1):117-119.
17. Breitbart V, Chavkin W, Wise PH. The accessibility of drug treatment for pregnant women: a survey of programs in five cities. American Journal of Public Health. 1994;84(10):1658-1661.
18. Drug Strategies. Keeping Score 1998. Women and Drugs: Looking at the Federal Drug Control Budget. Available at: http:// www.drugstrategies.org/ ks1998/indexbottom.html. Accessed Aug 2, 2004.
19. Office of Applied Studies. National survey of substance abuse treatment services (N-SSATS): 2003. Data on substance abuse treatment facilities, DASIS Series: S-24, DHHS Publication No. (SMA) 04-3966. Rockville, MD: Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration; 2004.
20. Grella CE, Greenwell L. Substance abuse treatment for women: changes in the settings where women received treatment and types of services provided, 1987-1998. Journal of Behavioral Health Services & Research. 2004;31(4):367-383.
21. Tinney SM, Oser CB, Johnson JA, et al. Predominantly female caseloads: identifying organizational correlates in private substance abuse treatment centers. Journal of Behavioral Health Services & Research. 2004;31(4):403-417.
22. Olmstead T, Sindelar JL. To what extent are key services offered in treatment programs for special populations? Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment. 2004;27:9-15.
23. Uziel-Miller ND, Lyons JS. Specialized substance abuse treatment for women and their children: an analysis of program design. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment. 2000;19:355-367.
24. Grella CE, Joshi V. Gender differences in drug treatment careers among clients in the national Drug Abuse Treatment Outcome Study. American Journal of Drug and Alcohol Abuse. 1999;25(3):385-406.
25. Grella CE. Women in residential drug treatment: differences by program type and pregnancy. Journal of Health Care for the Poor and Underserved. 1999;10(2):216-229.
26. D'Aunno T, Vaughn TE. An organizational analysis of service patterns in outpatient drug abuse treatment units. Journal of Substance Abuse. 1995;7:27-42.
27. Friedmann PD, Alexander, JA, D'Aunno TA. Organizational correlates of access to primary care and mental health services in drug abuse treatment units. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment. 1999;16(1):71-80.
28. Wallen J. Need for services research on treatment for drug abuse in women. In: Wetherington CL, Roman AB, eds. Drug Addiction Research and the Health of Women. Rockville, MD: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, National Institute of Drug Abuse; 1998:229-236.
29. Adams TK, Heeringa SG. Outpatient Substance Abuse Treatment System Surveys (OSATSS): Technical Documentation for OSATSS-5, 1999-2000. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan, Institute for Social Research, Survey Design and Analysis Unit; 2001.
30. Rothman KJ. No adjustments are needed for multiple comparisons. Epidemiology. 1990;1(1):43-46.
31. Perneger TV. What's wrong with Bonferroni adjustments. British Medical Journal. 1998;316(7139):1236-1238.
32. Friedmann PD, Lemon SC, Durkin EM, et al. Trends in comprehensive service availability in outpatient drug abuse treatment. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment. 2003;24(1):81-88.