Speech aerodynamics and nasalance in oral cancer patients treated with microvascular transfers

Journal of Craniofacial Surgery

Volumn 16, Issue 6, 2005, Pages 990-995

  Markkanen Leppänen, Mari ^a   Isotalo, Elina ^a,b,d   Mäkitie, Antti A ^a   Suominen, Erkki ^a   Asko Seljavaara, Sirpa ^a   Haapanen, Marja Leena ^a,c  

^a HELSINKI UNIVERSITY CENTRAL HOSPITAL   (Finland)

^b TAMPERE UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Finland)

^c TAMPERE UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Finland)

^d TURKU UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Finland)

Author keywords

Malignancy; Mouth; Reconstruction; Velopharyngeal function

Indexed keywords

ACOUSTICS; ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CANCER PATIENT; CANCER RADIOTHERAPY; CANCER SURGERY; CLINICAL ARTICLE; DYNAMICS; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; FREE TISSUE GRAFT; HUMAN; HYPOPHARYNX CANCER; MALE; MOUTH CANCER; NOSE; OROPHARYNX CANCER; PHARYNX; POSTOPERATIVE PERIOD; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SPEECH; SPEECH ARTICULATION; TREATMENT OUTCOME; TUMOR VOLUME; ADJUVANT THERAPY; CLASSIFICATION; METHODOLOGY; MICROSURGERY; MIDDLE AGED; MOUTH TUMOR; OROPHARYNX TUMOR; PATHOLOGY; PATHOPHYSIOLOGY; PHYSIOLOGY; PLASTIC SURGERY; PROSPECTIVE STUDY; SOFT PALATE; SPEECH DISORDER; SPEECH INTELLIGIBILITY;

ADULT; AGED; AGED, 80 AND OVER; FEMALE; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; HUMANS; MALE; MICROSURGERY; MIDDLE AGED; MOUTH NEOPLASMS; OROPHARYNGEAL NEOPLASMS; PALATE, SOFT; PHARYNX; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; RADIOTHERAPY, ADJUVANT; RECONSTRUCTIVE SURGICAL PROCEDURES; SPEECH; SPEECH ACOUSTICS; SPEECH DISORDERS; SPEECH INTELLIGIBILITY; SURGICAL FLAPS;

EID: 33646988642     PISSN: 10492275     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/01.scs.0000179753.14037.7a     Document Type: Article

References (33)

1. McConnel FM, Pauloski BR, Logemann JA, Rademaker AW, Colangelo L, Shedd D, Carroll W. Functional results of primary closure vs flaps in oropharyngeal reconstruction: A prospective study of speech and swallowing. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1998;124:625-630
2. Nicoletti G, Soutar DS, Jackson MS, Wrench AA, Robertson G, Robertson C. Objective assessment of speech after surgical treatment of oral cancer: Experience from 196 selected cases. Plast Reconstr Surg 2004;113:114-125
3. Newman LA, Robbins KT, Logemann JA, Rademaker AW, Lazarus CL, Hamner A, Tusant S. Swallowing and speech ability after treatment of head and neck cancer with targeted intraarterial versus intravenous chemoradiation. Head Neck 2002;24:68-77
4. Kotz T, Costello R, Li Y, Posner MR. Swallowing dysfunction after chemoradiation for advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck. Head Neck 2004;26:365-372
5. Allal AS, Nicoucar K, Mach N, Dulguerov P. Quality of life in patients with oropharynx carcinomas: Assessment after accelerated radiotherapy with or without chemotherapy versus radical surgery and postoperative radiotherapy. Head Neck 2003;25: 833-839; discussion 839-840
6. Bressmann T, Sader R, Whitehill TL, Samman N. Consonant intelligibility and tongue motility in patients with partial glossectomy. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2004;62:298-303
7. Nicoletti G, Soutar DS, Jackson MS, Wrench AA, Robertson G. Chewing and swallowing after surgical treatment of oral cancer: functional evaluation in 196 selected cases. Plast Reconstr Surg 2004;114:329-338
8. Yoshioka F, Ozawa S, Sumita YI, Mukohyama H, Taniguchi H. The pattern of tongue pressure against the palate during articulating glossal sounds in normal subjects and glossectomy patients. J Med Dent Sci 2004;51:19-25
9. Mady K, Sader R, Hoole PH, Zimmermann A, Horch HH. Speech evaluation and swallowing ability after intra-oral cancer. Clin Linguist Phon 2003;17:411-420
10. McKinstry A, Perry A. Evaluation of speech in people with head and neck cancer: A pilot study. Int J Lang Commun Disord 2003;38:31-46
11. Seikaly H, Rieger J, Wolfaardt J, Moysa G, Harris J, Jha N. Functional outcomes after primary oropharyngeal cancer resection and reconstruction with the radial forearm free flap. Laryngoscope 2003;113:897-904
12. Zimmermann A, Sader R, Hoole P, Bressmann T, Mady K, Horch HH. The influence of oral cavity tumor treatment on the voice quality and on fundamental frequency. Clin Linguist Phon 2003;5:273-281
13. Huber JE, Stathopoulos ET, Sussman JE. The control of aerodynamics, acoustics, and perceptual characteristics during speech production. J Acoust Soc Am 2004;116:2345-2353
14. Hinton VA, Warren DW. Relationship between integrated oral - nasal differential pressure and velopharyngeal closure. Cleft Palate Craniofac J 1995;32:306-310
15. Warren DW, Dalston RM, Mayo R. Hypernasality and velopharyngeal impairment. Cleft Palate Craniofac J 1994;31:257-262
16. Laine T, Warren DW, Dalston RM, Morr KE. Screening of velopharyngeal closure based on nasal airflow rate measurements. Cleft Palate J 1988;25:220-225
17. Warren DW. Compensatory speech behavior in individuals with cleft palate: A regulation/control phenomenon. Cleft Palate J 1986;23:251-260
18. Dalston RM, Warren DW, Smith LR. The aerodynamic characteristics of speech produced by normal speakers and cleft palate speakers with adequate velopharyngeal function. Cleft Palate J 1990;27:393-399; discussion 400-401
19. Bodin I, Jaghagen EL, Isberg A. Intraoral sensation before and after radiotherapy and surgery for oral and pharyngeal cancer. Head Neck 2004;26:923-929
20. Haapanen M-L. Nasalance scores in normal Finnish speech. Folia Phoniatr (Basel) 1991;43:197-203
21. Warren DW. Vowel oral airflow rates and air volumes for vowels. Cleft Palate J 1985;22:134-135
22. Trost JE. Articulatory additions to the classic description of the speech of persons with cleft palate. Cleft Palate J 1981;18:193-203
23. Warren DW. Perci: A method for rating palatal efficiency. Cleft Palate J 1979;16:279-285
24. Warren DW, Dubois AB. A pressure-flow technique for measuring velopharyngeal orifice area during continuous speech. Cleft Palate J 1964;16:52-71
25. Dalston RM, Warren DW, Dalston ET. Use of nasometry as a diagnostic tool for identifying patients with velopharyngeal impairment. Cleft Palate Craniofac J 1991;28:184-189
26. Zajac DJ. Pressure-flow characteristics of /m/ and /p/ production in speakers without cleft palate: developmental findings. Cleft Palate Craniofac J 2000;37:468-477
27. Dalston R, Neiman G, Gonzalez-Landa G. Nasometric sensitivity and specificity: A cross-dialect and cross-culture study. Cleft Palate Craniofac J 1993;30:285-291
28. Hardin MA, Van Demark DR, Morris HL, Payne MM. Correspondence between Nasalance scores and listener judgments of hypernasality and hyponasality. Cleft Palate Craniofac J 1992;9:346-351
29. Zajac DJ, Mayo R. Aerodynamic and temporal aspects of velopharyngeal function in normal speakers. J Speech Hear Res 1996;39:1199-1207
30. Andreassen ML, Smith BE, Guyette TW. Pressure-flow measurements for selected oral and nasal sound segments produced by normal adults. Cleft Palate Craniofac J 1992;29:1-9
31. Warren DW, Hairfield WM, Seaton D, Hinton VA. The relationship between nasal airway cross-sectional area and nasal resistance. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop 1987;92:390-395
32. Warren DW, Hinton VA, Pillsbury HC III, Hairfield WM. Effects of size of the nasal airway on nasal airflow rate. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 1987;113:405-408
33. International Standard Classification of Education ISCED November 1997. Available at: http://www.unesco.org/education/information/nfsunesco/doc/ isced_1997.htm