A simple regression method for mapping quantitative trait loci in line crosses using flanking markers

Heredity

Volumn 69, Issue 4, 1992, Pages 315-324

  Haley, C S ^a   Knott, S A ^b  

^a BABRAHAM INSTITUTE   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF EDINBURGH   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Inbred lines; Interval mapping; Maximum likelihood; QTL; Regression

Indexed keywords

ANIMAL; ARTICLE; CHROMOSOME MAP; COMPARATIVE STUDY; COMPUTER SIMULATION; CROSS BREEDING; GENETIC MARKER; INBREEDING; METHODOLOGY; QUANTITATIVE TRAIT LOCUS; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; STATISTICAL MODEL; STATISTICS;

ANIMALS; CHROMOSOME MAPPING; COMPUTER SIMULATION; CROSSES, GENETIC; GENETIC MARKERS; INBREEDING; LIKELIHOOD FUNCTIONS; MODELS, STATISTICAL; QUANTITATIVE TRAIT LOCI; REGRESSION ANALYSIS;

EID: 33646942472     PISSN: 0018067X     EISSN: 13652540     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1038/hdy.1992.131     Document Type: Article

References (15)

1. aitkin, m., anderson, d., Francis, b. and Hinde, J. 1989. Statistical Modelling in GLIM. Oxford University Press, Oxford. draper, n. r. and smith, h. 1966. Applied Regression Analysis John Wiley and Sons, New York.
2. genstat a COMMITTEE, 1989. Genstat 5 Reference Manual, Clarendon Press, Oxford.
3. haldane, j. b. s. 1919. The combination of linkage values and the calculation of distance between the loci of linked factors. J. Genet., 8, 299-309.
4. haley, c. s. 1991. Use of DNA fingerprints for the detection of major genes for quantitative traits in domestic species. Anim. Genet., 22, 259-277.
5. knapp, s. j. 1991. Using molecular markers to map multiple quantitative trait loci: models for backcross, recombinant inbred, and doubled haploid progeny. Theor. App. Genet., 81, 333-338.
6. KNAPP, S. J., BRIDGES, W. C. Jr. and BIRKES, D. 1990. Mapping quantitative trait loci using molecular marker linkage maps. Theor. App. Genet., 79, 583-592.
7. knott, s. a. and haley, c. s. 1992. Aspects of maximum likelihood methods for the mapping of quantitative trait loci in line crosses. Genet. Res. 60, (in press).
8. lander, e. s. and Botstein, D. 1989. Mapping Mendelian factors underlying quantitative traits using RFLP linkage maps. Genetics, 121, 185-199.
9. mather, k. m. and jinks, j. l. 1982. Biometrical Genetics 3rd edn. Chapman and Hall, London.
10. mccullagh, p. and nelder, j. a. 1983. Generalized Linear Models. Chapman and Hall, London.
11. morton, n. e. 1955. Sequential tests for the detection of linkage. Am. J. Hum. Genet., 7, 277-318.
12. PATERSON, A. H., DAMON, S., HEWITT, J. D., ZAMIR, D., RABINOWITCH, H. D., LINCOLN, S. E., LANDER, E. S. and TANKSLEY, S. D. 1991. Mendelian factors underlying quantitative triats in Tomato: Comparison across species, generations and environments. Genetics, 127, 181-197.
13. patterson, h. d. and Thompson, R. 1971. The recovery of inter-block information when block sizes are unequal. Bio- metrika, 58, 545-554.
14. weller, j. i. 1987. Mapping, and analysis of quantitative trait loci in Lycopersicon (tomato) with the aid of genetic markers using approximate maximum likelihood methods. Heredity, 59, 413-421.
15. wilks, s. s. 1938. The large sample distribution of the likelihood ratio for testing composite hypotheses. Ann. Math. Stat., 9, 60-62.