Material symbols

Philosophical Psychology

Volumn 19, Issue 3, 2006, Pages 291-307

  Clark, Andy ^a  

^a Department of Philosophy ^*  (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

Extended Mind; Hybrid Systems; Language; Materiality; Mind; Symbols; Thought

Indexed keywords

EID: 33646941968     PISSN: 09515089     EISSN: 1465394X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/09515080600689872     Document Type: Review

References (33)

1. Adams, F., & Aizawa, K. (2001). The bounds of cognition. Philosophical Psychology, 14, 43-64.
2. Barsalou, L. W. (1999). Perceptual symbol systems. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 22, 577-609.
3. Boysen, S. T., Bernston, G., Hannan, M., & Cacioppo, J. (1996). Quantity-based inference and symbolic representation in chimpanzees (Pantroglodytes). Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 22, 76-86.
4. Carruthers, P. (2002). The cognitive functions of language. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 25, 657-726.
5. Churchland, P. M. (1989). A neurocomputational perspective. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
6. Churchland, P. M. (1996). The neural representation of the social world. In L. May, M. Friedman, & A. Clark (Eds.), Minds and morals (pp. 91-108). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
7. Clark, A. (1997). Being there: Putting brain, body and world together again. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
8. Clark, A. (1998). Magic words: How language augments human computation. In P. Carruthers & J. Boucher (Eds.), Language and thought: Interdisciplinary themes (pp. 162-183). Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
9. Clark, A. (2003). Natural-born cyborgs: Minds, technologies, and the future of human intelligence. New York: Oxford University Press.
10. Clark, A., & Chalmers, D. (1998). The extended mind. Analysis, 58, 7-19.
11. Clowes, R. W., & Morse, A. F. (2005). Scaffolding cognition with words. In L. Berthouze, F. Kaplan, H. Kozima, Y. Yano, J. Konczak, G. Metta, J. Nadel, G. Sandini, G. Stojanov, & C. Balkenius (Eds.), Proceedings of 5th International Workshop on Epigenetic Robotics: Modeling cognitive development in robotic systems (Lund University Cognitive Studies, Vol. 123, pp. 101-105). Lund, Sweden: Lund University Cognitive Studies.
12. Colunga, E., & Smith, L. B. (2005). From the lexicon to expectations about kinds: A role for associative learning. Psychological Review, 112, 347-382.
13. Dehaene, S. (1997). The number sense. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
14. Dehaene, S., Spelke, E., Pinel, P., Stanescu, R., & Tviskin, S. (1999). Sources of mathematical thinking: Behavioral and brain imaging evidence. Science, 284, 970-974.
15. Dennett, D. C. (1991). Consciousness explained. New York: Little Brown.
16. Dennett, D. C. (1996). Kinds of minds. New York: Basic Books.
17. Densmore, S., & Dennett, D. C. (1999). The virtues of virtual machines. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 59, 747-767.
18. Fodor, J. A. (1975). The language of thought. New York: Crowell.
19. Fodor, J. A. (1998). Do we think in mentalese: Remarks on some arguments of Peter Carruthers. In critical condition: Polemical essays on cognitive science and the philosophy of mind (pp. 63-74). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
20. Hermer-Vazquez, L., Spelke, E., & Katsnelson, A. (1999). Sources of flexibility in human cognition: Dual-task studies of space and language. Cognitive Psychology, 39, 3-36.
21. Hurley, S. (1998). Consciousness in action. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
22. Milner, A., & Goodale, M. (1995). The visual brain in action. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
23. Philippides, A., Husbands, P., Smith, T., & O'Shea, M. (2005). Flexible couplings: Diffusing neuromodulators and adaptive robotics. Artificial Life, 11, 139-160.
24. Prinz, J. (2004). Sensible ideas: A reply to Sarnecki and Markman and Stilwell. Philosophical Psychology, 17, 419-430.
25. Prinz, J., & Clark, A. (2004). Putting concepts to work: Some thoughts for the 21st century. Mind & Language, 19, 57-69.
26. Rowlands, M. (1999). The body in mind: Understanding cognitive processes. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.
27. Rupert, R. (2004). Challenges to the hypothesis of extended cognition. Journal of Philosophy, 101, 389-428.
28. Schwartz, D. L., & Black, J. B. (1996). Shuttling between depictive models and abstract rules: Induction and fallback. Cognitive Science, 20, 457-498.
29. Schyns, P. G., Goldstone, R. L., & Thibaut, J.-P. (1998). The development of features in object concepts. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 21, 1-54.
30. Smith, L., & Gasser, M. (2005). The development of embodied cognition: Six lessons from babies. Artificial Life, 11, 13-30.
31. Thompson, R. K. R., Oden, D. L., & Boysen, S. T. (1997). Language-naive chimpanzees (Pan troglodytes) judge relations between relations in a conceptual matching-to-sample task. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Animal Behavior Processes, 23, 31-43.
32. Wilson, R. A. (1994). Wide computationalism. Mind, 103, 351-372.
33. Wilson, R. A. (2004). Boundaries of the mind: The individual in the fragile sciences-Cognition. Cambridge, England: Cambridge University Press.