|
Volumn 90, Issue 3, 2005, Pages 271-279
|
Two-stage revision surgery to treat an infected hip implant. A comparison between a custom-made spacer and a pre-formed one.
a a a a |
Author keywords
[No Author keywords available]
|
Indexed keywords
AGED;
ARTICLE;
COMPARATIVE STUDY;
EVALUATION;
FEMALE;
FOLLOW UP;
HIP ARTHROPLASTY;
HIP PROSTHESIS;
HUMAN;
INFECTION;
INSTRUMENTATION;
MALE;
METHODOLOGY;
MIDDLE AGED;
PROSTHESIS;
REOPERATION;
TIME;
AGED;
ARTHROPLASTY, REPLACEMENT, HIP;
FEMALE;
FOLLOW-UP STUDIES;
HIP PROSTHESIS;
HUMANS;
MALE;
MIDDLE AGED;
PROSTHESIS DESIGN;
PROSTHESIS-RELATED INFECTIONS;
REOPERATION;
TIME FACTORS;
|
EID: 33646936301
PISSN: 00094749
EISSN: None
Source Type: Journal
DOI: None Document Type: Article |
Times cited : (27)
|
References (0)
|