An ethic of analysis: An argument for critical analysis of research interviews as an ethical practice

Advances in Nursing Science

Volumn 29, Issue 2, 2006, Pages 84-97

  Cloyes, Kristin Gates ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF UTAH   (United States)

Author keywords

Critical theory; Discourse theory; Ethics; Interview; Mental illness; Political discourse analysis; Poststructuralism; Prison; Research

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CLINICAL NURSING RESEARCH; ETHICS; HUMAN; INTERVIEW; MEDICAL ETHICS; NURSING METHODOLOGY RESEARCH; PRISON; PRISONER; PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECT; QUALITATIVE RESEARCH; RESEARCH ETHICS; SOCIAL CLASS; SOCIAL DOMINANCE; SOCIAL ISOLATION; STANDARD;

CLINICAL NURSING RESEARCH; ETHICS, CLINICAL; ETHICS, NURSING; ETHICS, RESEARCH; HUMANS; INTERVIEWS; NURSING METHODOLOGY RESEARCH; PRISONERS; PRISONS; QUALITATIVE RESEARCH; SOCIAL CLASS; SOCIAL DOMINANCE; SOCIAL ISOLATION;

EID: 33646925106     PISSN: 01619268     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/00012272-200604000-00002     Document Type: Review

References (38)

1. Allen DG, Cloyes KG. The language of "experience" in nursing research. Nurs Inq. 2005;12(2):98-105.
2. Cheek J. Postmodern and Poststructural Approaches to Nursing Research. London: Sage; 1999.
3. Peter M. Derrida and the tasks for the new humanities: postmodern nursing and the culture wars. Nurs Phil. 2002;3(1):47-57.
4. Mitchell, DP. Postmodernism, health and illness. J Adv Nurs. 1996;23(1):201-205.
5. Cloyes KG. The Politics of Mental Illness in a Prison Control Unit: A Discourse Analysis [dissertation]. Seattle, Wa: University of Washington; 2004.
6. Koivisto K, Janhonen S, Latvala E, Väisänen L. Applying ethical guidelines in nursing research on people with mental illness.Nurs Ethics. 2001;8(4):328-339.
7. Thurgood G. Legal, ethical and human-rights issues related to the storage of oral history interviews in archives. Int Hist Nurs J. 2002;7(2):38-49.
8. Whittaker A. Eliciting qualitative information about induced abortion: lessons from Northeast Thailand. Health Care Women Int . 2002;23(607):631-641.
9. Donalek JG. The interview in qualitative research. Urol Nurs. 2005;25(2):124-125.
10. Manias E, Street A. Rethinking ethnography: reconstructing nursing relationships. J Adv Nurs. 2001;33(2):234-242.
11. Foss C, Ellefson B. The invisible encroachments: ethical challenges in qualitative research. Vard I Norden. 2004;24(3):48-51.
12. Stiffman AR, Brown E, Striley CW, Ostmann E, Chowa G. Cultural and ethical issues concerning research on American Indian youth. Ethics Behav. 2005;15(1):1-14.
13. Holmes D, Warner D. The anatomy of a forbidden desire: men, penetration and semen exchange. Nurs Inq. 2005;12(1):10-20.
14. Fowler C, Lee A. Re-writing motherhood: researching women's experiences of learning to mother for the first time. Aust J Adv Nurs. 2004;22(2):39-44.
15. Phillips DA. Reproducing normative and marginalized masculinities: adolescent male popularity and the outcast. Nurs Inq. 2005;12(3):219-230.
16. Hardin PK. Shape-shifting discourses of anorexia nervosa: reconstituting pathology. Nurs Inq. 2003;10(4):209-217.
17. Antaki C, Billig M, Edwards D, Potter J. Discourse analysis means doing analysis: a critique of six analytic shortcomings. Discourse Analysis Online [serial online]. March 2003;doc 2.
18. Gee JP. Discourse Analysis: Theory and Method. London: Routledge; 1999.
19. Laclau E, Mouffe C. Hegemony and Socialist Strategy: Towards a Radical Democratic Politics. London: Verso; 1985.
20. Laclau E. Minding the gap: the subject of politics. In: Laclau E, ed. The Making of Political Identities. London: Verso; 1994:11-39.
21. Laclau E. Emancipation(s). London: Verso; 1996.
22. Laclau E. Identity and hegemony: the role of universality in the constitution of political logics. In: Butler J, Laclau E, Zizek S, eds. Contingency, Hegemony, Universality: Contemporary Dialogues on the Left. London: Verso; 2000:44-89.
23. Torfing J. New Theories of Discourse: Laclau, Mouffe and Zizek. Oxford: Blackwell; 1999:300.
24. Chouliaraki L, Fairclough N. Discourses in Late Modernity: Rethinking Critical Discourse Analysis. Edinburgh, UK: Edinburgh University Press; 1999:37.
25. Billig M. Discursive, rhetorical and ideological messages. In: Wetherell M, Taylor S, Yates SJ, eds. Discourse Theory and Practice: A Reader. London: Sage; 2001.
26. Hall S. The work of representation. In: Hall S, ed. Representation: Cultural Representation and Signifying Practices. London: Sage; 1997:13-74.
27. Clegg S. Frameworks of Power. London: Sage; 1989.
28. Norval AJ. Trajectories for future research in discourse theory. In: Howarth DR, Norval AJ, Stavrakakis Y, eds. Discourse Theory and Political Analysis: Identities, Hegemonies and Social Change. Manchester, UK: Manchester University Press; 2000:219-236.
29. Bourdieu P. Language and Symbolic Power. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press; 1991.
30. Foucault M. The Use of Pleasures. Harmondsworth: Penguin; 1992.
31. Hurley R, trans. The History of Sexuality; Vol. 2.
32. Foucault M. On the genealogy of ethics: an overview of work in progress. In: Rabinow P ed. The Foucault Reader. Harmondsworth: Penguin; 1984:340-372.
33. Cloyes KG, Lovell D, Allen DG, Rhodes LA. Assessment of psychosocial impairment in a supermaximum security unit sample. Crim Just Behav. 2006;33(4):1-22.
34. Madrid v Gomez, 889 F Supp 1146 (ND Cal 1995).
35. Zizek S. The Ticklish Subject: The Absent Centre of Political Ontology. London: Verso; 1999.
36. Mishler EG. Research Interviewing: Context and Narrative. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press; 1986.
37. Billig M. Discursive, rhetorical and ideological messages. In: Wetherell M, Taylor S, Yates SJ, eds. Discourse Theory and Practice: A Reader. London: Sage; 2001:210-221.
38. Laclau E. Politics and the limits of modernity. In: Docherty T, ed. Postmodernism: A Reader. London: Harvester Wheatsheaf; 1993:341.