Recovery of cohesion in narrative discourse after left-hemisphere stroke

Journal of Rehabilitation Research and Development

Volumn 42, Issue 6, 2005, Pages 737-746

  Ellis, Charles ^a,c   Rosenbek, John C ^b   Rittman, Maude R ^a   Boylstein, Craig A ^a  

^a DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA   (United States)

^c MEDICAL UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA   (United States)

Author keywords

Aphasia; Cohesion; Cohesive markers; Cohesive ties; Communication; Discourse; Language; Narratives; Speech; Stroke

Indexed keywords

COMMUNICATION; DIAGNOSIS; SPEECH;

APHASIA; COHESION; COHESIVE MARKERS; COHESIVE TIES; DISCOURSE; LANGUAGE; NARRATIVES; STROKE;

PATIENT REHABILITATION;

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; COHORT ANALYSIS; CONTROLLED STUDY; HUMAN; INTERPERSONAL COMMUNICATION; LANGUAGE DISABILITY; LEFT HEMISPHERE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; STROKE;

AGE FACTORS; AGED; APHASIA; COHORT STUDIES; DOMINANCE, CEREBRAL; FEMALE; FOLLOW-UP STUDIES; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; RECOVERY OF FUNCTION; RISK ASSESSMENT; SEVERITY OF ILLNESS INDEX; SEX FACTORS; SPEECH PRODUCTION MEASUREMENT; SPEECH THERAPY; STROKE; TREATMENT OUTCOME; VERBAL BEHAVIOR;

EID: 33646914745     PISSN: 07487711     EISSN: 07487711     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1682/JRRD.2005.02.0026     Document Type: Article

References (45)

1. Rosenbek JC, LaPointe LL, Wertz RT. Aphasia: A clinical approach. Austin (TX): Pro-Ed; 1989.
2. Laska AC, Hellblom A, Murray V, Kahan T, Von Arbin M. Aphasia in acute stroke and relation to outcome. J Intern Med. 2001;249(5):413-22.
3. Bays CL. Quality of life of stroke survivors: A research synthesis. J Neurosci Nurs. 2001;33(6):310-16.
4. Kauhanen ML, Korpelainen JT, Hiltunen R, Maata R, Mononen H, Brusin E, Sotaniemi KA, Myllyla VV. Aphasia, depression, and non-verbal cognitive impairment in ischaemic stroke. Cerebrovasc Dis. 2000;10(6):455-61.
5. King RB. Quality of life after stroke. Stroke. 1996;27(9):1467-72.
6. LaPointe LL. Quality of life with aphasia. Semin Speech Lang. 1999;20(1):5-16.
7. Hartman J. Measurement of early spontaneous recovery from aphasia with stroke. Ann Neurol. 1981;9(1):89-91.
8. Lendrem W, Lincoln NB. Spontaneous recovery of language in patients with aphasia between 4 and 34 weeks after stroke. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1985;48(8):743-48.
9. Lomas J, Kertesz A. Patterns of spontaneous recovery in aphasic groups: A study of adult stroke patients. Brain Lang. 1978;5(3):388-401.
10. Pedersen PM, Vinter K, Olsen TS. Aphasia after stroke: Type, severity and prognosis. The Copenhagen aphasia study. Cerebrovasc Dis. 2004;17(1):35-43.
11. Wade DT, Hewer RL, David RM, Enderby PM. Aphasia after stroke: Natural history and associated deficits. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 1986;49(1):11-16.
12. Copland DA, Chenery HJ, Murdoch BE. Persistent deficits in complex language function following dominant nonthalamic subcortical lesions. J Med Speech-Lang Pathol. 2000;8(1):1-14.
13. Ulatowska HK, Allard L, Chapman S. Narrative and procedural discourse in aphasia. In: Joanette Y, Brownell H, editors. Discourse ability and brain damage: Theoretical and impirical perspectives. New York (NY): Springer Verlag; 1990. p. 180-98.
14. Ulatowska HK, Olness GS. Some observations on narratives by aphasics and their contributions to narrative theory. J Narrat Life Hist. 1997;7:259-64.
15. Glosser G. Discourse patterns in neurologically impaired and aged populations. In: Brownell H, Joanette Y, editors. Narrative discourse in neurologically impaired and normal aging adults. San Diego (CA): Singular Publishing Group, Inc; 1993. p. 191-211.
16. Halliday M, Hasan R. Cohesion in English. London (England): Longman Publishing Group; 1976.
17. Coelho CA. Discourse production deficits following traumatic brain injury: A critical review of the recent literature. Aphasiology. 1995;9(5):409-29.
18. Van Leer E, Turkstra L. The effect of elicitation task on discourse coherence and cohesion in adolescents with brain injury. J Commun Disord. 1999;32(5):327-48.
19. Glosser G, Deser T. Patterns of discourse production among neurological patients with fluent language disorders. Brain Lang. 1990;40(1):67-88.
20. Ulatowska HK, North AJ, Macaluso-Hayes S. Production of narrative discourse and procedural discourse in aphasia. Brain Lang. 1981;13(2):345-71.
21. Ulatowska HK, Freedman-Stern R, Doyel AW, Macaluso-Haynes S, North AJ. Production of narrative discourse in aphasia. Brain Lang. 1983;19(2):317-34.
22. Bloom RL, Borod JC, Santschi-Haywood C, Pick LH, Obler LK. Left and right hemispheric contributions to discourse coherence and cohesion. Int J Neurosci. 1996:88(1-2):125-40.
23. Liles BZ. Cohesion in the narratives of normal and language-disordered children. J Speech Hear Res. 1985;28(1):123-33.
24. Coelho CA. Story narratives of adults with closed head injury and non-brain-injured adults: Influence of socioeconomic status, elicitation task, and executive functioning. J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2002;45(6):1232-48.
25. Liles BZ, Coelho CA, Duffy RJ, Zalagens MR. Effects of elicitation procedures on the narratives of normal and closed head-injured adults. J Speech Hear Disord. 1989;54(3):356-66.
26. Coelho CA, Liles BZ, Duffy RJ. Discourse analyses with closed head injured adults: Evidence for differing patterns of deficits. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 1991;72(7):465-68.
27. Hartley LL, Jensen PJ. Three discourse profiles of closed-head-injury speakers: Theoretical and clinical implications. Brain Inj. 1990;6(3):271-82.
28. McDonald S. Pragmatic language skills after closed head injury: Ability to meet the informational needs of the listener. Brain Lang. 1993;44(1):28-46.
29. Mentis M, Prutting CA. Cohesion in the discourse of normal and head-injured adults. J Speech Hear Res. 1987;30(1):88-98.
30. Davis GA, Coelho CA. Referential cohesion and logical coherence of narration after closed head injury. Brain Lang. 2004;89(3):508-23.
31. Lemme ML, Hedberg NL, Bottenberg DE. Cohesion in the narratives of aphasic adults. In: Brookshire R, editor. Clinical Aphasiology Conference; 1984 May 20-24; Seabrook Island, SC. Minneapolis (MN): BRK Publishers; 1984. p. 215-22.
32. Lock S, Armstrong L. Cohesion analysis of the expository discourse of normal, fluent aphasic and demented adults: A role in differential diagnosis. Clin Linguist Phon. 1997;11(4):299-317.
33. Han M, Kang D, Bae H, Oh G, Jeong S, Roh J. Aphasia in striatocapsular infarction may be explained by concomitant small cortical infarctions of cortical language zones [abstract]. Stroke. 2003;34(1):259.
34. Hillis AE, Wityk RJ, Barker PB, Beauchamp NJ, Gailloud P, Murphy K, Cooper O, Metter EJ. Subcortical aphasia and neglect in acute stroke: The role of cortical hypoperfusion. Brain. 2002;125(Pt 5):1094-1104.
35. Hillis AE, Barker PB, Wityk RJ, Aldrich EM, Restrepo L, Breese EL, Work M. Variability in subcortical aphasia is due to variable sites of cortical hypoperfusion. Brain Lang. 2004;89(3):524-30.
36. Nadeau S, Crosson B. Subcortical aphasia. Brain Lang. 1997;58(3):355-402; discussion 418-23.
37. Radanovic M, Scaff M. Speech and language disturbances due to subcortical lesions. Brain Lang. 2003;84(3):337-52.
38. Weiller C, Willmes K, Reiche W, Thron A, Isensee C, Buell V, Ringelstein EB. The case of aphasia or neglect after striatocapsular infarction. Brain. 1993;116(Pt 6):1509-25.
39. Speech Tools 2.0 [CD-ROM]. Dallas (TX): SIL International; 2001.
40. Hunt KW. Grammatical structures written at three grade levels. Champaign (IL): National Council of Teachers of English; 1965.
41. Ellis C, Rosenbek JC, Rittman M. Difference or disorder: An analysis of African American English after stroke [abstract]. In: American Speech-Language-Hearing Association Conference; 2004 Nov 18-20; Philadelphia, PA. Rockville (MD): American Speech-Language-Hearing Association; 2004.
42. Ulatowska HK, Hayashi MM, Cannito MP, Fleming SG. Disruption of reference in aging. Brain Lang. 1986;28(1):24-41.
43. North AJ, Ulatowska HK, Macaluso-Hayes S. Discourse performance in older adults. Int J Aging Hum Dev. 1986;23(4):267-83.
44. Mackenzie C. Adult spoken discourse: The influences of age and education. Int J Lang Commun Disord. 2000;35(2):269-85.
45. Stover SE, Haynes WO. Topic manipulation and cohesive adequacy in conversations of normal adults between ages of 30 and 90. Clin Linguist Phon. 1989;3(2):137-49.