Comparison of the books of the new testament (english translation) in terms of emotion and word use

Psychological Reports

Volumn 98, Issue 1, 2006, Pages 57-64

  Whissell, Cynthia ^a  

^a LAURENTIAN UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AFFECT; ARTICLE; COMPARATIVE STUDY; HUMAN; LANGUAGE; LINGUISTICS; LITERATURE; PUBLICATION;

AFFECT; BIBLE; HUMANS; LANGUAGE; TRANSLATIONS; VOCABULARY;

EID: 33646912995     PISSN: 00332941     EISSN: 1558691X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.2466/PR0.98.1.57-64     Document Type: Article

References (6)

1. EHRMAN, B. D. (1990) The New Testament. Oxford, UK: Oxford Univer. Press.
2. SCHUMM, W. R. (2002) Commentary on Morgan-Miller's "An exploratory study of different types of violence presented in early Christian and Islamic historical documents." Psychological Reports, 91, 571-574.
3. SCHUMM, W. R. (2004) Relative chronology of violent and nonviolent themes in early Christian and Islamic historical documents. Psychological Reports, 94, 931-932.
4. WHISSELL, C. (1998) A parsimonious technique for the analysis of word use patterns in English texts and transcripts. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 86, 595-613.
5. WHISSELL, C. (2004a) Emotion and style in an English translation of the Quran. Psychological Reports, 94, 523-544.
6. WHISSELL, C. (2004b) Using computer-scored measures of emotion and style to discriminate among disputed and undisputed Pauline and non-Pauline epistles. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 98, 1117-1125.