From scale-free to Erdos-Rényi networks

Physical Review E - Statistical, Nonlinear, and Soft Matter Physics

Volumn 73, Issue 5, 2006, Pages

  Gómez Gardeñes, Jesús ^a   Moreno, Yamir ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ZARAGOZA   (Spain)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMPUTER SIMULATION; INTERPOLATION; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; PARAMETER ESTIMATION;

PERCOLATION TRANSITION; STRUCTURAL HETEROGENEITY;

NETWORKS (CIRCUITS);

EID: 33646895435     PISSN: 15393755     EISSN: 15502376     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevE.73.056124     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Handbook of Graphs and Networks: From the Genome to the Internet, edited by, S. Bornholdt, and, H. G. Schuster, (Wiley-VCH, Germany, 2003).
2. M. E. J. Newman, SIAM Rev. SIREAD 0036-1445 10.1137/S003614450342480 45, 167 (2003).
3. S. Boccaletti, V. Latora, Y. Moreno, M. Chavez, and D.-U. Hwang, Phys. Rep. PRPLCM 0370-1573 10.1016/j.physrep.2005.10.009 424, 175 (2006).
4. S. H. Strogatz, Nature (London) NATUAS 0028-0836 10.1038/35065725 410, 268 (2001).
5. A.-L. Barabási and R. Albert, Science SCIEAS 0036-8075 10.1126/science.286.5439.509 286, 509 (1999).
6. A.-L. Barabási, R. Albert, and H. Jeong, Physica A PHYADX 0378-4371 10.1016/S0378-4371(99)00291-5 272, 173 (1999).
7. R. Pastor-Satorras and A. Vespignani, Evolution and Structure of the Internet: A Statistical Physics Approach (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2004).
8. E. F. Keller, BioEssays BIOEEJ 0265-9247 27, 1060 (2005).
9. S. N. Dorogovtesev and J. F. F. Mendes, Adv. Phys. ADPHAH 0001-8732 10.1080/00018730110112519 51, 1079 (2002).
10. F. Wang, Y. Moreno, and Y. Sun, Phys. Rev. E PLEEE8 1063-651X 10.1103/PhysRevE.73.036123 73, 036123 (2006).
11. S. Mossa, M. Barthelemy, H. E. Stanley, and L. A. N. Amaral, Phys. Rev. Lett. PRLTAO 0031-9007 10.1103/PhysRevLett.88.138701 88, 138701 (2002).
12. J. Gómez-Gardeñes and Y. Moreno, Phys. Rev. E PLEEE8 1063-651X 10.1103/PhysRevE.69.037103 69, 037103 (2004).
13. P. L. Krapivsky and S. Redner, Phys. Rev. E PLEEE8 1063-651X 10.1103/PhysRevE.63.066123 63, 066123 (2001).
14. G. Caldarelli, A. Capocci, P. De Los Rios, and M. A. Muñoz, Phys. Rev. Lett. PRLTAO 0031-9007 10.1103/PhysRevLett.89.258702 89, 258702 (2002).
15. D. J. Watts and S. H. Strogatz, Nature (London) NATUAS 0028-0836 10.1038/30918 393, 440 (1998).
16. A. Barrat and M. Weigt, Eur. Phys. J. B EPJBFY 1434-6028 10.1007/s100510050067 13, 547 (2000).
17. Note that all the networks studied here are random. The only difference is that they are obtained through two distinct attachment process, namely, uniform and nonuniform random linking.
18. Z. Liu, Y.-Ch. Lai, N. Ye, and P. Dasgupta, Phys. Lett. A PYLAAG 0375-9601 10.1016/S0375-9601(02)01317-8 303, 337 (2002).
19. We recall the possibility that the connected set is temporarily composed of more than one connected component. This is the case for the initial stage of the network growth when α→1. However, when Ω is high enough the final network is com-posed by a unique connected component.
20. S. N. Dorogovtsev, J. F. F. Mendes, and A. N. Samukhin, Phys. Rev. Lett. PRLTAO 0031-9007 10.1103/PhysRevLett.85.4633 85, 4633 (2000).
21. D. S. Callaway, M. E. J. Newman, S. H. Strogatz, and D. J. Watts, Phys. Rev. Lett. PRLTAO 0031-9007 10.1103/PhysRevLett.85.5468 85, 5468 (2000).
22. R. Cohen, K. Erez, D. ben Avraham, and S. Havlin, Phys. Rev. Lett. PRLTAO 0031-9007 10.1103/PhysRevLett.85.4626 85, 4626 (2000).
23. R. Cohen, K. Erez, D. ben Avraham, and S. Havlin, Phys. Rev. Lett. PRLTAO 0031-9007 10.1103/PhysRevLett.86.3682 86, 3682 (2001).
24. R. Pastor-Satorras and A. Vespignani, Phys. Rev. Lett. PRLTAO 0031-9007 10.1103/PhysRevLett.86.3200 86, 3200 (2001).
25. R. Pastor-Satorras and A. Vespignani, Phys. Rev. E PLEEE8 1063-651X 10.1103/PhysRevE.63.066117 63, 066117 (2001).
26. Y. Moreno, R. Pastor-Satorras, and A. Vespignani, Eur. Phys. J. B EPJBFY 1434-6028 10.1007/s10051-002-8996-y 26, 521 (2002).
27. G. Grinstein and R. Linsker, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. PNASA6 0027-8424 102, 9948 (2005).