Get a life: Six tactics for optimizing time spent online

Computers in the Schools

Volumn 20, Issue 3, 2003, Pages 73-101

  Hirumi, Atsusi ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF HOUSTON CLEAR LAKE   (United States)

Author keywords

E learning; Interactivity; Online learning; Systematic design; Web based education; Web based instruction

Indexed keywords

EID: 33646864660     PISSN: 07380569     EISSN: 15287033     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1300/J025v20n03_09     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Berge, Z. L., 1999. Interaction in post-secondary Web-based learning. Educational Technology, 39(1):5–11.
2. Berge, Z. L., 2002. Active, interactive and reflective e-learning. Quarterly Review of Distance Education, 3(2):181–190.
3. Dick, W., Carey, L., and Carey, J. O., 2001. The systematic design of instruction, 5th ed., New York:Addison-Wesley.
4. Gagne, R. M., 1977. The Conditions of Learning, 3rd ed., New York:Holt, Rinehart, & Winston.
5. Gilbert, L., and Moore, D. R., 1998. Building interactivity into Web courses:Tools for social and instructional interactions. Educational Technology, 38(3):29–35.
6. Hannafin, M. J., Hannafin, K. M., Land, S. M., and Oliver, K., 1997. Grounded practice and the design of learning systems. Educational Technology Research and Development, 45(3):101–117.
7. Hirumi, A., 2002a. Designing and sequencing eLearning interactions:A grounded approach. International Journal on E-Learning, 1(1):19–27.
8. Hirumi, A., 2002b. A framework for analyzing, designing and sequencing planned eLearning interactions. Quarterly Review of Distance Education, 3(2):141–160.
9. Hirumi, A., Arneson, W., and Chandler, K., 2001. Training faculty on the systematic design of e-learning. Concurrent session presented at the annual Texas Distance Learning Association Conference. 2001, Houston, TX.
10. Hoska, D. M., 1993. “Motivating learners through CBI feedback:Developing a positive learner perspective”. In Interactive instruction and feedback, Edited by:Dempsey, J. V., and Sales, G. C., 105–32. Englewood Cliffs, NJ:Educational Technology.
11. Jonassen, D. H., Tessmer, M., and Hannum, W. H., 1999. Task analysis methods for instructional design, Mahwah, NJ:Lawrence Erlbaum.
12. Kulhavy, R. W., and Wager, W., 1993. “Feedback in programmed instruction:Historical context and implications for practice”. In Interactive instruction and feedback, Edited by:Dempsey, J. V., and Sales, G. C., 2–20. Englewood Cliffs, NJ:Educational Technology.
13. Liaw, S., and Huang, H., 2000. Enhancing interactivity in Web-based instruction:A review of the literature. Educational Technology, 40(3):41–45.
14. Northrup, P., 2001. A framework for designing interactivity in Web-based instruction. Educational Technology, 41(2):31–39.
15. Northrup, P. T., and Rasmussen, K. L., 2000. Designing a Web-based program:Theory to design. Paper presented at the annual conference of the Association for Educational Communications and Technology. February2000, Long Beach, CA.
16. Shale, D., and Garrison, D. R., 1990. “Education and communication”. In Education at a distance, Edited by:Garrison, D. R., and Shale, D., 23–39. Malabar, FL:Robert E. Krieger.
17. Smith, P. L., and Ragan, T. J., 1999. Instructional design, 2nd ed., Upper Saddle River, NJ:Prentice-Hall.
18. Weller, H. G., 1988. Interactivity in microcomputer-based instruction:Its essential components and how it can be enhanced. Journal of Educational Technology Systems, 28(2):23–27.
19. Yacci, M., 2000. Interactivity demystified:A structural definition for distance education and intelligent computer-based instruction. Educational Technology, 40(4):5–16.