Europe and America - Together or Apart: An Empirical Test of Differences in Actual Reported Results

Advances in International Accounting

Volumn 19, Issue , 2006, Pages 221-242

  Lewis, Philip A ^a   Salter, Stephen B ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 33646863277     PISSN: 08973660     EISSN: None     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1016/S0897-3660(06)19009-1     Document Type: Review

References (21)

1. Alexander D., and Archer S. On the myth of "Anglo-Saxon" financial accounting. The International Journal of Accounting 35 4 (2000) 539-557
2. Alexander D., and Archer S. On the myth of "Anglo-Saxon" financial accounting: A response to Nobes. The International Journal of Accounting 38 4 (2003) 503-504
3. Ball R., Robin A., and Wu J. Incentives versus standards: Properties of accounting income in four East Asian countries, and implications for acceptance of IAS. Journal of Accounting and Economics 36 1-3 (2003) 235-270
4. Blake J., Fortes H., Gowthorpe C., and Paananen M. Implementing the EU accounting directives in Sweden - practitioners' views. The International Journal of Accounting 34 3 (1999) 421-438
5. Cairns, D., & Nobes, C. (2000). The convergence handbook - a comparison between international accounting standards and U.K. financial reporting requirements. Centre for Business Performance, Institute of Chartered Accountants in England and Wales.
6. Choi F., and Levich R. Behavioral effects of international accounting diversity. Accounting Horizons 5 2 (1991) 1-13
7. d'Arcy A. Accounting classification and the international harmonisation debate - an empirical investigation. Accounting, Organization and Society 26 (2001) 327-349
8. d'Arcy A. Accounting classification and the international harmonisation debate: A reply to a comment. Accounting, Organization and Society 29 (2004) 201-206
9. Doupnik T., and Salter S. An empirical test of a judgmental international classification of financial reporting practices. Journal of International Business Studies 24 1 (1993) 41-60
10. Epps R., and Oh J. Market perception of foreign financial reports: Differential earnings response coefficients between U.S. and foreign GAAP. Journal of International Accounting, Auditing and Taxation 6 1 (1997) 49-74
11. Flower J. The future shape of harmonization: The EU versus the IASC versus the SEC. European Accounting Review 6 (1997) 281-303
12. Gray S. The impact of international accounting differences from a security-analysis perspective: Some European evidence. Journal of Accounting Research 18 1 (1980) 64-76
13. Gray S. Towards a theory of cultural on the development of accounting influence systems internationally. Abacus 24 1 (1988) 1-15
14. Hair J., Anderson R., Tatham R., and Black W. Multivariate data analysis (1998), MacMillan Publishing Company, New York
15. Hoarau C. International accounting harmonization: American hegemony or mutual recognition with benchmarks. European Accounting Review 4 2 (1995) 217-233
16. Nobes C. A judgmental international classification of financial reporting practices. Journal of Business, Finance, and Accounting 10 1 (1983) 1-19
17. Nobes C. International classification of financial reporting (1984), Croom Helm, London
18. Nobes C. On the myth of "Anglo-Saxon" financial accounting: A comment. The International Journal of Accounting 38 1 (2003) 95-104
19. Nobes C. On accounting classification and the international harmonization debate. Accounting, Organizations and Society 29 (2004) 189-200
20. Salter, S. (1991). Classification of financial reporting systems and a test of their environmental determinants. Ph.D. Dissertation, University of South Carolina.
21. Salter S., and Niswander F. Cultural influence on the development of accounting systems internationally: A test of Gray's (1988) theory. Journal of International Business Studies 26 2 (1995) 379-397