Sentiment classification of movie reviews using contextual valence shifters

Computational Intelligence

Volumn 22, Issue 2, 2006, Pages 110-125

  Kennedy, Alistair ^a   Inkpen, Diana ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF OTTAWA   (Canada)

Author keywords

Evaluation; Machine learning; Semantic orientation; Sentiment classification; Valence shifters

Indexed keywords

ALGORITHMS; CLASSIFICATION (OF INFORMATION); NUMERICAL METHODS; SEMANTICS;

SEMANTIC ORIENTATION; SENTIMENT CLASSIFICATION; VALENCE SHIFTERS;

LEARNING SYSTEMS;

EID: 33646859933     PISSN: 08247935     EISSN: 14678640     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-8640.2006.00277.x     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (24)

1. AIT-MOKHTAR, S., J.-P. CHANOD, and C. Roux. 2002. Robustness beyond shallowness: Incremental deep parsing. Natural Language Engineering, 8(2-3):121-144.
2. BAI, X., R. PADMAN, and E. AIROLDI. 2004. Sentiment extraction from unstructured text using tabu search-enhanced Markov blanket. In Proceedings of the International Workshop on Mining for and from the Semantic Web, pp. 24-35, Seattle, Washington.
3. BEINEKE, P., T. HASTIE, and S. VAITHYANATHAN. 2004. The sentimental factor: Improving review classification via human-provided information. In Proceedings of the 42nd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL 2004), pp. 263-270, Barcelona, Spain.
4. CLARKE, C. L. A., and E. TERRA. 2003. Passage retrieval vs. document retrieval for factoid question answering. In Proceedings of the 26th Annual International ACM SIGIR Conference on Research and Development in Information Retrieval, pp. 427-428, Toronto, Canada.
5. GAMON, M. 2004. Sentiment classification on customer feedback data: Noisy data, large feature vectors, and the role of linguistic analysis. In Proceedings the 20th International Conference on Computational Linguistics, pp. 841-847, Geneva, Switzerland.
6. HATZIVASSILOGLOU, V., and K. MCKEOWN. 1997. Predicting the semantic orientation of adjectives. In Proceedings of the 35th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL'97), pp. 174-181, Madrid, Spain.
7. HAYAKAWA, S. I. (Editor). 1994. Choose the Right Word (2nd ed.), revised by Eugene Ehrlich, Harper Perennial, New York.
8. INKPEN, D. Z., O. FEIGUINA, and G. HIRST. 2005. Generating more-positive and more-negative text. In Computing Attitude and Affect in Text: Theory and Applications. Edited by J. Shanahan, Y. Qu, and J. Wiebe. The Information Retrieval Series, Vol. 20, Springer, Dordrecht, The Netherlands, pp. 187-196.
9. JOACHIMS, T. 1999. Making large-scale SVM learning practical. In Advances in Kernel Methods - Support Vector Learning. Edited by B. Schlkopf, C. Burges, and A. Smola. MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts, pp. 169-184.
10. JOACHIMS, T. 2002. Optimizing search engines using clickthrough data. In Proceedings of the Eight ACM SIGKDD Conference on Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining, pp. 133-142, ACM Press, New York.
11. MANNING, C., and H. SCHÜTZE. 1999. Foundations of Statistical Natural Language Processing. The MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts.
12. PANG, B., and L. LEE. 2004. A sentimental education: Sentiment analysis using subjectivity summarization based on minimum cuts. In Proceedings of the 42nd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL 2004), pp. 271-278, Barcelona, Spain.
13. PANG, B., L. LEE, and S. VAITHYANATHAN. 2002. Thumbs up? Sentiment classification using machine learning techniques. In Proceedings of the 2002 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, pp. 79-86, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
14. POLANYI, L., and A. ZAENEN. 2004. Contextual valence shifters. In Computing Attitude and Affect in Text: Theory and Applications. Edited by J. Shanahan, Y. Qu, and J. Wiebe. The Information Retrieval Series, Vol. 20, Springer, Dordrecht, The Netherlands, pp. 1-9.
15. RILOFF, E., and J. WIEBE. 2003. Learning extraction patterns for subjective expressions. In Proceedings of the 2003 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, pp. 105-112, Sapporo, Japan.
16. STONE, P. J., D. C. DUNPHY, M. S. SMITH, et al. 1966. The General Inquirer: A Computer Approach to Content Analysis. MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts.
17. STOYANOV, V., C. CARDIE, D. LITMAN, and J. WIEBE. 2004. Evaluating an opinion annotation scheme using a new multi-perspective question and answer corpus. In Computing Attitude and Affect in Text: Theory and Applications. Edited by J. Shanahan, Y. Qu, and J. Wiebe. The Information Retrieval Series, Vol. 20, Springer, Dordrecht, The Netherlands, pp. 77-89.
18. TABOADA, M., and J. GRIEVE. 2004. Analyzing appraisal automatically. In Proceedings of the AAAI Symposium on Exploring Attitude and Affect in Text: Theories and Applications (published as AAAI technical report SS-04-07), pp. 158-161, Stanford, California.
19. TURNEY, P. 2002. Thumbs up or thumbs down? Semantic orientation applied to unsupervised classification of reviews. In Proceedings of the 40th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (ACL 2002), pp. 417-424, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
20. TURNEY, P., and M. LITTMAN. 2002. Unsupervised learning of semantic orientation from a hundred-billion-word corpus. Technical Report ERB-1094, National Research Council, Institute for Information Technology.
21. TURNEY, P., and M. LITTMAN. 2003. Measuring praise and criticism: Inference of semantic orientation from association. ACM Transactions on Information Systems (TOIS), 21(4):315-346.
22. WIEBE, J., T. WILSON, R. BRUCH, M. BELL, and M. MARTIN. 2004. Learning subjective language. Computational Linguistics, 30(3):277-308.
23. WILSON, T., J. WIEBE, and P. HOFFMANN. 2005. Recognizing contextual polarity in phrase- level sentiment analysis. In Proceedings of Human Language Technologies Conference/Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (HLT/EMNLP 2005), pp. 347-354, Vancouver, Canada.
24. Yu, H., and V. HATZIVASSILOGLOU. 2003. Towards answering opinion questions: Separating facts from opinions and identifying the polarity of opinion sentences. In Proceedings of the 2003 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, pp. 129-136, Sapporo, Japan.