Towards discovery of frequent patterns in description logics with rules

Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics)

Volumn 3791 LNCS, Issue , 2005, Pages 84-97

  Józefowska, Joanna ^a   Ławrynowicz, Agnieszka ^a   Łukaszewski, Tomasz ^a  

^a POZNAN UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY   (Poland)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMPUTER PROGRAMMING LANGUAGES; DATA REDUCTION; DATABASE SYSTEMS; SEMANTICS; SET THEORY; TERMINOLOGY; WORLD WIDE WEB;

COMPLEX DATA REPRESENTATIONS; DESCRIPTION LOGICS; SEMANTIC WEB RULE LANGUAGES; SUBSETS;

LOGIC PROGRAMMING;

EID: 33646850023     PISSN: 03029743     EISSN: 16113349     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1007/11580072_8     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (17)

1. Agrawal, R. Mannila, H., Srikant, R., Toivonen, H. and Verkamo, A. I., Fast discovery of association rules. Advances in Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining. AAAI Press, Menlo Park, CA, pp. 307-328, (1996)
2. Berners-Lee T., Hendler J., and Lassila O., The Semantic Web. Scientific American, 284(5):34-43, (2001)
3. Dehaspe, L., Toivonen, H.: Discovery of frequent Datalog patterns. Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery, 3(1): 7-36, (1999)
4. De Raedt L., and J. Ramon, Condensed representations for Inductive Logic Programming, Principles of Knowledge Representation and Reasoning: Proceedings of the Ninth International Conference (KR2004) (Dubois, D. and Welty C., eds.), pp. 438-446, (2004)
5. Donini, P., Lenzerini, M., Nardi, D., & Schaerf, A., AL-log: Integrating datalog and description logics, Journal of Intelligent Information Systems, 10:3, 227-252, (1998)
6. Džeroski S., Lavrač N., (Eds.), Relational data mining. Springer, (2001)
7. Orosof B. N., Horrocks I., Volz R., and S. Decker. Description Logic Programs: Combining Logic Programs with Description Logic. In Proc. of the Twelfth Int'l World Wide Web Conf. (WWW 2003), pages 48-57. ACM, (2003)
8. Helft, N. Inductive generalization: A logical framework. In I. Bratko, & N. Lavrač (Eds.), Progress in Machine Learning-Proceedings of EWSL87: 2nd European Working Session on Learning (pp. 149-157), Wilmslow, U.K.: Sigma Press, (1987)
9. Hitzler P., Studer R., and Y. Sure, Description Logic Programs: A Practical Choice For the Modelling of Ontologies. In: Proceedings of the 1st Workshop on Formal Ontologies meet Meet Industry, FOMI'05, Verona, Italy, (2005)
10. Horrocks, I., Patel-Schneider, P.F., Boley, H., Tabet, S., Orosof, B., Dean, M., SWRL: A Semantic Web Rule Language Combining OWL and RuleML, W3C Member Submission 21 May 2004, http://www.w3.org/Submission/SWRL/
11. Hustadt U., Motik B. and U. Sattler. Reasoning for Description Logics around SHIQ in a Resolution Framework. FZI Technical Report 3-8-04/04, (2004)
12. Lisi, F.A., Ferilli, S., & Fanizzi, N., Object identity as search bias for pattern spaces. In F. van Harmelen (Ed.), ECAI 2002. Proceedings of the 15th European Conference on Artificial Intelligence (pp. 375-379). Amsterdam: IOS Press, (2002)
13. Lisi F.A., Malerba D., Inducing Multi-Level Association Rules from Multiple Relation, Machine Learning Journal, 55, 175-210, (2004)
14. McOuinness D.L., van Harmelen F., (eds), Overview of OWL Web Ontology Language, W3C Recommendation 10 February 2004, http://www.w3.org/TR/owl- features/
15. Mannila, H., Toivonen, H.: Levelwise search and borders of theories in knowledge discovery. Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery 1(3): 241-258, (1997)
16. Motik B., Sattler U., Studer R.. Query Answering for OWL-DL with Rules. Proc. of the 3rd International Semantic Web Conference (ISWC 2004), Hiroshima, Japan, November, 2004, pp. 549-563, (2004)
17. Nienhuys-Cheng, S., de Wolf, R. Foundations of inductive logic programming, vol. 1228 of Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence. Springer, (1997)