AIM - Ability improvement model

Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics)

Volumn 3792 LNCS, Issue , 2005, Pages 71-82

  Pries Heje, Jan ^a   Johansen, Jørn ^b  

^a IT UNIVERSITY OF COPENHAGEN   (Denmark)

^b DELTA Danish Electronics Light & Acoustics   (Denmark)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMPUTATIONAL METHODS; FAILURE ANALYSIS; INFORMATION MANAGEMENT; INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; PARAMETER ESTIMATION; SOCIETIES AND INSTITUTIONS;

ABILITY IMPROVEMENT MODEL (AIM); INNOVATION PROJECTS; PROJECTS ABILITY; PROMISING RESULTS;

SOFTWARE ENGINEERING;

EID: 33646845780     PISSN: 03029743     EISSN: 16113349     Source Type: Book Series    
DOI: 10.1007/11586012_8     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (15)

1. Goldenson, Dennis R. & Hersleb, James D. (1995). After the Appraisal: A systematic Survey of Process Improvement, its Benefits, and Factors that Influence Success. Technical Report CMU/SEI-95-TR-009. Software Engineering Institute, Carnegie Mellon University, Pittsburgh
2. El-Emam, Khaled et al. (2001). Modelling the Likelihood of Software Process Improvement: An Exploratory Study. Empirical Software Engineering. 6. P. 207-229. Kluwer Academic Publishers. The Netherlands.
3. Blanco et al. (2001). SPI Patterns: Learning from Experience. IEEE Software, May/June 2001, pp. 28-35.
4. Rainer, Austen & Hall, Tracy. (2002). Key success factors for implementing software process improvement: a maturity-based analysis. The Journal of Systems and Software 62 (2002). pp. 71-84.
5. Grady, Robert. (1997). Successful Software process improvement, Pentice Hall PTR, ISBN: 0-13-626623-1
6. Zahran, Sami (1998). Software Process Improvement - Practical Guidelines for Business Success. Addison-Wesley, ISBN 0-201-17782-X
7. Stelzer, Dirk & Mellis, Werner (1999) Success Factors of Organizational Change in Software Process Improvement. Software Process Improvement and Practice, Volume 4, Issue 4
8. Dybå, Tore. (2000). An Instrument for Measuring the Key Factors of Success in Software Process Improvement. Empirical Software Engineering. 5. P. 357-390. Kluwer Academic Publishers. The Netherlands.
9. Strauss, A. and J. Corbin (1990). Basics of Qualitative Research: Techniques and Procedures for Developing Grounded Theory, Sage Publications, Beverly Hills, CA, USA.
10. Strauss, A. and J. Corbin (1998). Basics of Qualitative Research: Techniques and Procedures for Developing Grounded Theory, Sage Publications, Beverly Hills, CA, USA.
11. Hevner, A., S. March, J. Park, and S. Ram (2004), "Design Science in Information Systems Research", MIS Quarterly, 28, 1, pp. 75-106.
12. Kuvaja, Pasi, Jouni Similä, Lech Krzanik, Adriana Bicego, Samuli Saukkonen, Günter Koch (1994). "Software Process Assessment & Improvement. The BOOTSTRAP Approach." Blackwell Publishers.
13. Galliers, R. (1992). Choosing Information Systems Research Approaches. In: Galliers, R. (Ed.). Information Systems research. Blackwell scientific Publications. Oxford, England.
14. Susman, G. and Evered, R. (1978). An assessment of the scientific merits of action research. Administrative Science Quarterly 23 (4): 582-603.
15. Chrissis, Mary Beth, Mike Konrad & Sandy Shrum (2003). CMMI - Guidelines for Process Integration and Product Improvement. Addison-Wesley. ISBN 0-321-15496-7.