Homostyly and autogamy in Ophiorrhiza pumila (Rubiaceae) from the Ryukyu Archipelago

Journal of Japanese Botany

Volumn 81, Issue 2, 2006, Pages 113-120

  Nakamura, Koh ^a   Denda, Tetsuo ^a   Yokota, Masatsugu ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF THE RYUKYUS   (Japan)

Author keywords

Autogamy; Floral morphology; Heterostyly; Ophiorrhiza pumila; Ryukyu Islands

Indexed keywords

HEXAPODA; INSECTA; OPHIORRHIZA PUMILA; RUBIACEAE;

EID: 33646844078     PISSN: 00222062     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Bahadur B. 1968. Heterostyly in Rubiaceae: review. J. Osmondia Univ. (Science). Golden Jubilee Volume: 207-238.
2. Barrett S. C. H. 1988. The evolution, maintenance, and loss of self-incompatibility systems. In: Lovett-Doust J. and Lovett-Doust L. (eds.), Plant Reproductive Ecology: Patterns and Strategies. pp. 98-124. Oxford University Press, New York.
3. _ 1992. Heterostylous genetic polymorphisms: model systems for evolutionary analysis. In: Barrett S. C. H. (ed.), Evolution and Function of Heterostyly. pp. 1-29. Springer-Verlag, Berlin.
4. _ and Glover D. E. 1985. On the Darwinian hypothesis of the adaptive significance of tristyly. Evolution 39: 766-774.
5. _ and Husband S. C. 1990. Variation in outcrossing rate in Eichhornia paniculata: the role of demographic and reproductive factors. Plant Species Biol. 5: 41-56.
6. _ and Shore J. S. 1987. Variation and evolution of breeding systems in the Turnera ulmifolia L. complex (Turneraceae). Evolution 41: 340-354.
7. _, Morgan M. T. and Husband B. C. 1989. The dissolution of a complex polymorphism: the evolution of self-fertilization in tristylous Eichhornia paniculata (Pontederiaceae). Evolution 43: 1398-1416.
8. Darwin C. 1877. The different forms of flowers on plants of the same species. Murray, London.
9. Darwin S. P. 1976. The Pacific species of Ophiorrhiza L. (Rubiaceae). Lyonia 1: 47-102.
10. Dowrick V. P. J. 1956. Heterostyly and homostyly in Primula obconica. Heredity 10: 219-236.
11. Ernst A. 1955. Self-fertility in monomorphic Primulas. Genetica 27: 391-448.
12. Faivre A. E. and McDade L. A. 2001. Population-level variation in the expression of heterostyly in three species of Rubiaceae: does reciprocal placement of anthers and stigmata characterize heterostyly? Amer. J. Bot. 85: 841-853.
13. Ganders F. R. 1979. The biology of heterostyly. New Zealand J. Bot. 17: 607-635.
14. Hatusima S. 1975. Flora of the Ryukyus (added and corrected). Okinawa Association of Biology Education, Naha (in Japanese).
15. Lloyd D. G. and Webb C. J. 1992. The selection of heterostyly. In: Barrett S. C. H. (ed.), Evolution and Function of Heterostyly. pp. 179-207. Springer-Verlag, Berlin.
16. Lo H. S. 1990. Taxonomic revision of the Chinese species of Ophiorrhiza (Rubiaceae). Bull. Bot. Res. 10: 1-82.
17. _ 1999. Ophiorrhiza pumila. In: Delectis florae Reipublicae Popularis Sinicae Agendae Academiae Sinicae (ed.), Flora Reipublicae Popularis Sinicae 71: 171 Science Press, Beijing (in Chinese).
18. Liu H. Y. and Yang T. Y. A. 1998. Ophiorrhiza L. In: the Editorial Committee of the Flora of Taiwan, Second Edition, Flora of Taiwan second edition, 4. Angiosperms - Dicotyledons (Diapensiaceae - Compositae): pp. 306-311. The Editorial Committee of the Flora of Taiwan, Second Edition, Taipei.
19. Naiki A. and Nagamasu H. 2004. Correlation between distyly and ploidy level in Damnacanthus (Rubiaceae). Amer. J. Bot. 91: 664-671.
20. Nakamura K., Denda T., Kameshima O., Uehara M. and Yokota M. 2003. Chromosome numbers of Ophiorrhiza and Psychotria (Rubiaceae) in the Ryukyus. Biol. Mag. Okinawa 41: 15-24 (in Japanese with English abstract).
21. Piper J. G. and Charlesworth B. 1986. The evolution of distyly in Primula vulgaris. Biol. J. Linn. Soc. 29: 123-173.
22. Ray P. M. and Chisaki H. F. 1957. Studies of Amsinckia. 1. Relationships among the primitive species. Amer. J. Bot. 44: 537-544.