Effect of urban soil compaction on infiltration rate

Journal of Soil and Water Conservation

Volumn 61, Issue 3, 2006, Pages 117-124

  Gregory, Justin H ^a   Dukes, Michael D ^a   Jones, Pierce H ^b   Miller, Grady L ^b  

^a University of Florida   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA   (United States)

Author keywords

Compaction; Cone index; Double ring; Infiltration; LID; Low impact development; Penetrometer; Stormwater

Indexed keywords

COMPACTION; INFILTRATION; RUNOFF; SANDY SOIL; STORMWATER;

FLORIDA [UNITED STATES]; NORTH AMERICA; UNITED STATES;

EID: 33646843131     PISSN: 00224561     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. American Society of Agricultural Engineers (ASAE). 2(UX). Soil cone penetrometer. ASAE Standards No. S313.3. American Society of Agricultural Engineers, St. Joseph, Michigan
2. American Society of Testing and Materials (ASTM). 2002a. Standard test method for density of soil in place by the drive-cylinder method. Annual Book of ASTM Standards 04.08 No. D2937-00. American Society of Testing and Materials, West Conshohockcn, Pennsylvania.
3. American Society of Testing and Materials (ASTM). 2002b. Standard test method for laboratory determination of water. (Moisture) Content of soil and rock by mass. In: Annual Book of ASTM Sundials 04.08. American Society of Testing and Materials, West Conshohocken, Pennsylvania.
4. 3)]. D698-00. Annual Book of ASTM. Standards 04.08. American Society of Testing and Materials, West Conshohocken, Pennsylvania.
5. Blake, G.R. and J.H. Hange. 1986. Bulk density. Pp. 363-375. In: Methods of soil analysis, Part I. ASA Monograph No. 9. American Agronomy Society, Madison. Wisconsin.
6. Buster, T.P. 1979. Soil survey of Marion County, Florida. Soil Conservation Service, Washington, DC.
7. Carlisle, V.W., F. Sodek, M.E. Collins, L.C. Hainniond, and W.G. Harris. 1989. Characterization data for selected Florida soils. Soil Science Research Report No. 89-1. University of Florida, Institute of Food and Agricultural Sciences, Gainesville. Florida.
8. Chow, V., D. Maidment, and L. Mays. 1988 Subsurface water. Pp. 109-110. In: Applied hydrology. McGraw-Hill, Inc., New York, New York.
9. Felton, P.M. and H.W. Lull. 1963. Suburban hydrology can improve watershed conditions. Pp. 93-94. In: Public Works No. 94.
10. Florida Department of Transportation (FDOT). 2003. Drainage manual. Florida Department of Transportation, Office of Design, drainage section, Tallahassee, Florida.
11. Gardner, W.H. 1986. Water content. Pp. 493-544. In: Methods of soil analysis. Part I. ASA Monograph No. 9. American Agronomy Society, Madison. Wisconsin.
12. Gee, G.W. and J.W. Bauder. 1986. Particle size analysis. Pp. 383-411. In: Methods of soil analysis, Part I. ASA Monograph No. 9. American Agronomy Society, Madison, Wisconsin.
13. Gregory. J.H., M.D. Dukes G.L. Miller, and P.H. Jones. 2005. Analysis of double-ring infiltration techniques and development of a simple automatic water delivery system. Applied Turfgrass Science. Available at: http://www. plantmanagemcmnctwork.org/pub/ats/gui de/2005/ring/.
14. Hakansson, I. and H. Petelkau. 1994. Benefits of limited axle load. Pp. 479-500. In: Soil compaction in crop production. Elsevier Science U.V., Amsterdam, Netherlands.
15. Hamilton, G.W. and D.V. Waddington. 1999. Infiltration rates on residential lawns in central Pennsylvania. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation 54(3):564-568.
16. Horton, R., M.D. Ankeny, and R.R. Allmaras. 1994. Effects of compaction on soil hydraulic properties. Pp. 479-500. In: Soil compaction in crop production. Elsevier Science B. V., Amsterdam, Netherlands.
17. Kays, B.L. 1980. Relationship of forest destruction and soil disturbance to increased flooding in the suburban North Carolina Piedmont. Pp. 118-1125. In: Metropolitan Tree Improvement Alliance Proceedings No. 3. Rutgers. New Jersey.
18. Kelling, K. and A. Peterson. 1975. Urban lawn infiltration rates and fertilizer runofflosses under simulated rainfall. Pp. 348-352. In: Soil Science Society of America Proceedings No. 39. Soil Science Society of America, Madison, Wisconsin.
19. Lal, R. and D.M. Vandoren. 1990. Influence of 25 years of conwater infiltration for two soils in Ohio. Soil and Tillage Research 16:71-84.
20. Pitt, R., R. Harrison, C. Henry, D. Xue, and T. O'Conner. 1999. Infiltration through disturbed urban soils and compost-amended soil effects on runoff quality and quantity. No. EPA/600/R-00/016. U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Research and Develop-ment, Washington, D.C.
21. Prince George's County. 1999. Low impact development design strategies: An integrated design approach. Maryland Department of Environmental Resource Programs and Planning Division, Largo, Maryland.
22. Richard, G., I. Cousin, J.F. Sillon, A. Bruand, and J. Gue'rif. 2001. Effect of compaction on soil porosity: Consequences on hydraulic properties. European Journal of Soil Science 52:49-58.
23. SAS. 2001. SAS User's Guide: Statistics. Version 8.02. SAS Institute. Inc. Cary, North Carolina.
24. U.S. Census Bureau. 2004. U.S. New privately owned housing units authorized by state: 2003. Manufacturing. Mining and Construction Statistics. Washington D.C.: U.S. Census Bureau. Available at: http://www.census.gov/const/ www/03statepiechart.pdf. Accessed 4 June 2005.
25. U.S. Department of Agriculture Natural Resources Conservation Service (USDA-NRCS). 2000. Urban soil compaction. Urban Technical Note No. 2. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Natural Resources Conservation Service, Soil Quality Institute, Auburn, Alabama.
26. U.S. Department of Agriculture Soil Conservation Service (USDA-SCS). 1985. Soil survey of Alachua County, Florida. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Soil Conservation Service, Washington. D.C.