Research misconduct and crime lessons from criminal science on preventing misconduct and promoting integrity

Accountability in Research

Volumn 12, Issue 3, 2005, Pages 225-240

  Adams, Douglas ^a   Pimple, Kenneth D ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF ARKANSAS   (United States)

^b INDIANA UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BIOMEDICAL AND BEHAVIORAL RESEARCH; CRIME; EDUCATION; EMPIRICAL RESEARCH; ETHICS; HUMAN; MOTIVATION; PERSONNEL; POLICE; PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECT; PSYCHOLOGICAL MODEL; RESEARCH ETHICS; SCIENCE; SCIENTIFIC MISCONDUCT; SOCIAL CONTROL; UNITED STATES;

BIOMEDICAL AND BEHAVIORAL RESEARCH;

CRIME; EMPIRICAL RESEARCH; ETHICS, RESEARCH; HUMANS; MODELS, PSYCHOLOGICAL; MOTIVATION; POLICE; RESEARCH PERSONNEL; SCIENCE; SCIENTIFIC MISCONDUCT; SOCIAL CONTROL, INFORMAL; UNITED STATES;

EID: 33646831458     PISSN: 08989621     EISSN: 15455815     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/08989620500217495     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. Adams, D. (2000). The Opportunity Structure of Deviance. In Encyclopedia of Criminology and Deviant Behavior. Volume One: Historical, Conceptual and Theoretical Issues. New York: Taylor and Francis.
2. Akers, R.L. (1973). Deviant Behavior: A Social Learning Approach. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth. 2nd ed. 1977.
3. Bandura, A. (1973). Aggression: A Social Learning Analysis. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice Hall.
4. Becker, G. (1974). Crime and Punishment: An Economic Approach. In Essays in the Economics of Crime and Punishment: G., Becker, and W., Landes (eds.). New York: Columbia University Press 1-54.
5. Becker, H.S. (1963). Outsiders. New York: Macmillan.
6. Clarke, R.V., and Mayhew, P. (1988). The British Gas Suicide Story and Its Crim-inological Implications. In M., Tonry, and N., Morris (eds.), Crime and Justice: A Review of Research. V10. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago.
7. Cohen, Lawrence E., and Felson, M. (1979). Social Change and Crime Rate Trends: A Routine Activity Approach, American Sociological Review, 44: 588-608.
8. Commission on Research Integrity. (1995). Integrity and Misconduct in Research. Washington, D.C., Department of Health and Human Services. Accessed August 16, 2005. Available at http://ori.hhs.gov/documents/reportcommission.pdf.
9. Committee on Assessing Integrity in Research Environments, National Research Council, Institute of Medicine. (2002). Integrity in Scientific Research: Creating an Environment that Promotes Responsible Conduct. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press. Accessed August 16, 2005. Available at http://books.nap.edu/catalog/10430.
10. Committee on the Responsible Conduct of Research, National Research Council. (1989). The Responsible Conduct of Research in the Health Sciences. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press. Accessed August 16, 2005. Available at http://books.nap.edu/catalog/1388.
11. Cornish, D.B., and Clark, R.V. (1986). The Reasoning Criminal. New York: Springer-Verlag.
12. Committee on Science, Engineering, and Public Policy, COSEPUP, Panel on Scientific Responsibility and the Conduct of Research, National Academy of Sciences, National Academy of Engineering, Institute of Medicine. (1992). Responsible Science: Ensuring the Integrity of the Research Process, Volume 1. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press. Accessed August 16, 2005. Available at http://www.nap.edu/catalog/1864.html.
13. Felson, M. (1998). Crime and Everyday Life (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
14. Felson, M. (2002). Crime and Everyday Life (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
15. Fyfe, J.F., Greene, J., Walsh, W.F., Wilson, O.W., and McLaren, R.C. (1997). Police Administration (5th ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.
16. Goldstein, J. (1960). Police Discretion Not to Invoke the Criminal Process: Low Visibility Decisions in the Administration of Justice, Yale Law Journal, 69(4): 543-588.
17. Goldstein, H. (1975). Police Corruption: A Perspective on Its Nature and Control. Washington DC: The Police Foundation.
18. Gottfredson, M., Hirschi, T., and Carofalo, J. (1990). A General Theory of Crime. Palo Alto, CA: Stanford University Press.
19. Guston, D. H. (2002). Developments in misconduct and integrity policies since publication of the 1992 COSEPUP report. In Committee on Assesing Integrity in Research Environments, National Research Council, Institute of Medicine. Integrity in Scientific Research: Creating an Environment that promotes Responsible Conduct. 167-177. Washington, D.C.: National Academy Press.
20. Hindelang, M. J., Gottfredson, M.R., and Garofalo, J. (1978). Victims of Personal Crime: An Empirical Foundation for a Theory of Personal Victimization. Cambridge, MA: Ballinger.
21. Lombroso, C. (1918 [1899]). Crime: It's Causes and Remedies (Rev. ed.). Brown, Little: Boston.
22. Martinson, R. (1974). What Works? Questions and Answers about Prison Reform, Public Interest, 35: 22-54.
23. Mayhew, P. M., Clark, R.V., Sturman, A, and Hough, J.M. (1976). Crime as Opportunity, Home Office Research Study no. 34 London: HMSO.
24. Merton, R. (1938). Social Structure and 'Anomie', American Sociological Review, 3: 672-682.
25. Osgood, D.W., Wilson, J.K., O'Malley, P.M., Bachman, J.G., and Johnson, L.D. (1996). Routine Activities and Individual Deviant Behavior, American Sociological Review, V61.
26. Rennie, D., Flanagin, F., Smith, R., and Smith, J. (2003). Fifth International Congress on Peer Review and Biomedical Publication: Call for Research, Journal of the American Medical Association, 289(11): 1438.
27. Siegel, L. (2004). Criminology: Theories, Patterns and Typologies (8th ed.). Belmont,CA: Wadsworth.
28. Sutherland, E.H. (1939). Principles of Criminology (4th ed.). Philadelphia, PA:J.B. Lippincott.
29. Walker, S. (2003). Early Intervention Systems for Law Enforcement Agencies:A Management and Planning Guide.
30. Walker, S., and Katz, C.M. (2002). The Police in America: An Introduction (4th ed.).New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.