Statistical, computational and visualization methodologies to unveil gene primary structure features

Methods of Information in Medicine

Volumn 45, Issue 2, 2006, Pages 163-168

  Pinheiro, M ^a   Afreixo, V ^a   Moura, G ^b   Freitas, A ^b   Santos, M A S ^b   Oliveira, José Luis ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF AVEIRO   (Portugal)

^b UNIVERSITY OF AVEIRO   (Portugal)

Author keywords

Bioinformatics software; Cluster analysis; Codon bias; Codon context; Contingency tables; Residual analysis

Indexed keywords

ALGORITHM; AMINO ACID SEQUENCE; BIOINFORMATICS; CANDIDA ALBICANS; CODON; COMPUTER PROGRAM; CONFERENCE PAPER; CONTINGENCY TABLE; ESCHERICHIA COLI; GENE SEQUENCE; GENE STRUCTURE; METHODOLOGY; MOLECULAR BIOLOGY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SACCHAROMYCES CEREVISIAE; STRUCTURE ANALYSIS; ARTICLE; BIOLOGY; GENETIC VARIABILITY; GENETICS; MULTIVARIATE ANALYSIS;

ALGORITHMS; CODON; COMPUTATIONAL BIOLOGY; GENETIC STRUCTURES; MULTIVARIATE ANALYSIS; SOFTWARE;

EID: 33646827361     PISSN: 00261270     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1055/s-0038-1634061     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (18)

1. Comeron JM, Aguadé M. An evaluation of measures of synonymous codon usage bias. J Mol Evol 1998; 47: 268-74.
2. Boycheva S, Chkodrov G, Ivanov I. Codon pairs in the genome of Escherichia coli. Bioinformatic 2003; 19: 987-98.
3. Berg OG, Silva PJ. Codon bias in Escherichia coli: the influence of codon context on mutation and selection. Nucleic Acids Res 1997; 25; 1397-1404.
4. Margolis RL, Ross CA. Diagnosis of Huntington disease. Clin Chem 2003; 49; 1726-32.
5. Parekh-Olmedo H, Krainc D, Kmiec EB. Targeted gene repair and its application to neurodegenerative disorders. Neoron 2002; 33: 495-8.
6. Avery PJ, Henderson DA. Fitting Markov chain models to discrete state series such as DNA sequences. Applied Statistics 1999; 48: 53-61.
7. Sheskin DJ. Parametric and nonparametric statistical procedures. Chapman & Hall, 2000.
8. Bishop YMM, Fienberg SE, Holland PW. Discrete Multivariate Analysis, Theory and Practice. MIT Press, 1975.
9. Irwin B, Heck JD, Wesley G. Codon Pair Utilization Biases Influence Translational Elongation Step Times. The Journal of Biological Chemistry 1995; 270 (39): 22801-6.
10. Haberman SJ. The analysis of residuals in cross-classified tables. Biometrics 1973; 29 (22): 205-20.
11. Shah AA, Giddings MC, Parvaz JB, Gesteland RF, Atkins JF, Ivanov IP. Computational identification of putative programmed translational frameshift sites. Bioinformatics 2002; 18: 1046-53.
12. Hooper SD, Berg OG. Detection of Genes with Atypical Nucleotide Sequence in Microbial Genomes. J Mol Evol 2002; 54: 365-75.
13. Fedorov A, Saxonov S, Gilbert W. Regularities of context-dependent codon bias in eukaryotic genes. Nucleic Acids Res 2002; 30; 1192-7.
14. Everitt BS. Cluster Analysis. 3rd ed. Edward Arnold, 1998.
15. Mardia KV, Kent JT, Bibby JM. Multivariate Analysis. Academic Press, 1994.
16. Everitt BS. The analysis of contingency tables. Chapman and Hall, 1977.
17. Sharp PM, Li WH. The codon Adaptation Index - a measure of directional synonymous codon usage bias, and its potential applications. Nucleic Acids Res 1987; 15 (3): 1281-95.
18. Wright F. The 'effective number of codons' used in a gene. Gene 1990; 87: 23-9.