Couples' experience of enactments and softening in marital therapy

American Journal of Family Therapy

Volumn 34, Issue 4, 2006, Pages 301-315

  Andersson, Lotta G ^a   Butler, Mark ^b   Seedall, Ryan B ^c  

^a Red Rock Canyon School   (United States)

^b BRIGHAM YOUNG UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^c High Country Counseling and Resource Centers   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; ARTICLE; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CLINICAL PRACTICE; CONSENSUS; CONTROLLED STUDY; EMOTIONALITY; EXPERIENCE; FEMALE; HUMAN; HUMAN RELATION; INTERPERSONAL COMMUNICATION; INTERVIEW; INTIMACY; MALE; MARITAL THERAPY; METHODOLOGY; PERSONALITY; QUALITATIVE RESEARCH; QUESTIONNAIRE; SELF REPORT; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 33646825416     PISSN: 01926187     EISSN: 15210383     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/01926180600553837     Document Type: Article

References (14)

1. Brimhall, A. and Butler, M. (2004) Dynamic neutrality as a model for engagement in marriage and family therapy: A retrospective and recommendations. Lubbock TX: Texas Tech University. Unpublished manuscript
2. Butler, M. and Gardner, B. (2003) Adapting enactments to couple reactivity: Five developmental stages Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 29(3), pp. 311-327. [INFOTRIEVE] [CSA]
3. Butler, M. and Gardner, B. and Bird, M. (1998) Not just a time-out: Change dynamics of prayer for religious couples in conflict situations Family Process, 37(4), pp. 451-475. [INFOTRIEVE] [CSA] [CROSSREF]
4. Elliott, R. (1986) Interpersonal process recall (IPR) as a psychotherapy process research method. In The psychotherapeutic process: A research handbook. (pp. 503-527). New York: Guilford.
5. Johnson, S. (1996) The practice of emotionally focused marital therapy: Creating connection. Florence KY: Brunner/Mazel.
6. Johnson, S. and Greenberg, L. (1988) Relating process to outcome in marital therapy Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 14(2), pp. 175-183. [CSA]
7. Kagan, N. and Kagan, H. (1990) IPR - A validated model for the 1990s and beyond The Counseling Psychologist, 18, pp. 436-440. [CSA]
8. Kagan, N. and Kagan, H. (1991) Interpersonal Process Recall. In Practical guide to using video in the behavioral sciences. (pp. 221-230). New York: Wiley.
9. Lambert, M. and Hansen, N. and Umphress, V. and Lunnen, K. and Okiishi, J. and Heufner, J. and Reisinger, C. (1996) Administration and scoring manual for the Outcome Questionnaire (OQ-45.2). Wilmington DE: American Professional Credentialing Services.
10. Nichols, M. and Fellenberg, S. (2000) The effective use of enactments in family therapy: A discovery-oriented process study Journal of Marital and Family Therapy, 26(2), pp. 143-152. [INFOTRIEVE] [CSA]
11. Odman, P. (1988) Hermeneutics. In Educational research, methodology, and measurement: An International handbook. (pp. 63-69). Pergamon.
12. Shields, C. and Sprenkle, D. and Constantine, J. (1991) Anatomy of an initial interview. The importance of joining and structuring skills American Journal of Family Therapy, 19, pp. 3-18. [CSA]
13. Spanier, G. (1976) Measuring dyadic adjustment: New scales for assessing the quality of marriage and similar dyads Journal of Marriage and the Family, 38, pp. 15-28. [CSA] [CROSSREF]
14. Strauss, A. and Corbin, J. (1990) Basics of qualitative research: Grounded theory procedures and techniques. Newbury Park CA: Sage Publications.