Using informatics to help implement clinical guidelines

Health Informatics Journal

Volumn 5, Issue 2, 1999, Pages 90-97

  Duff, L A ^a   Casey, A ^a  

^a ROYAL COLLEGE OF NURSING   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 33646823236     PISSN: 14604582     EISSN: 17412811     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/146045829900500206     Document Type: Article

References (58)

1. Benson T. The message is the medium. Health Service Journal 1997; 107; 5538 (IT Update): 4-5.
2. Grimshaw J M, Russell I T. Effect of clinical guidelines on medical practice: a systematic review of rigorous evaluations. The Lancet 1993a; 342: 1317-1322.
3. Institute for Medicine. Guidelines for Clinical Practice: from Development to Use. Washington DC: National Academy Press, 1992.
4. Eddy D M. Practice policies: where do they come from? Journal of American Medical Association (JMA) 1990a; 263 (9): 1265-1275.
5. Henry S B. Informatics: Essential infrastructure for quality assessment and improvement in nursing. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association (JAMIA) 1995; 2: 169-182.
6. Shiffman R N. Representation of clinical practice guidelines in conventional and augmented decision tables. J Am Med Informatics Assoc 1997;4: 382-393.
7. Agency for Health Care Policy and Research. Clinical Practice Guideline Development. Rockville, Maryland: AHCPR, 1993.
8. Eccles M, Clapp Z, Grimshaw J, Adams P C, Higgins B, Purves I, Russell I. Developing valid guidelines: methodological and procedural issues from the North of England Evidence-Based Guideline Development Project. Quality in Health Care 1996;5: 44-50.
9. Woolf S H. Practice guidelines: A new reality in medicine III: Impact on patient care. Archives of Internal Medicine (AIM) 1993; 153: 2646-2655.
10. NHSE Clinical Guidelines. Leeds: Department of Health, 1996.
11. Holzemer W L, Reilly C A. Variables, variability, and variations research: implications for medical informatics. JAMIA 1995; 2: 183-190.
12. Casey A. A Model for the Future of Nursing Education. London: Royal College of Nursing, 1997.
13. Zielstorff R D. Online practice guidelines: issues, obstacles and future prospects. JAMIA 5 (3): 227-236.
14. Hogarth R. Judgement and Choice. New York: Random House, 1987.
15. Eddy D. Clinical decision making: the challenge. JAMA 1990; 263: 287-290.
16. Haynes R B. Loose connections between peer-reviewed clinical journals and clinical practice. Annals of Internal Medicine 1990; 113: 724-728.
17. Howe D. A framework for understanding evaluation research in social work. Research Policy and Planning 1988; 5: 6-12.
18. Smith G, Cantley C. Pluralistic evaluation. In: Evaluation, Research Highlights in Social Work. London: Jessica Knightly, 1988: 8.
19. Lind E A, Tyler T R. The Social Psychology of Procedural Justice. New York: Plenum Press, 1988.
20. Greenfield S, Kaplan S H, Ware J E, Yano E M, Frank H J L. Patients' participation in medical care: effects on blood sugar control and quality of life in diabetes. Journal of Internal Medicine 1989; 86: 645-648.
21. Greenfield S, Nelson E C. Recent developments and future issues in the use of health status assessment measures in clinical settings. Medical Care 1992; 30 (5 Suppl): MS23-MS41.
22. Duff L, Kelson M, Marriott S, McIntosh A, Brown S, Cape J, Marcus N, Traynor M. Clinical Guidelines: Involving Patients and Service Users. London: Royal College of Nursing, 1996.
23. Bergstrom N. Development of Guidelines: Contribution of Patient's Preferences. In: Nursing Informatics '97 Conference, Post-Conference Meeting. Stockholm, Sweden, 2-4 October 1997.
24. Entwistle V A, Watt I S, Herring J E. Information about Health Care Effectiveness. London: Kings Fund, 1996.
25. Lenert L A, Soetikno R M. Automated computer interviews to elicit utilities: potential applications in the treatment of deep venous thrombosis. JAMIA 1997; 4: 49-56.
26. Drife J O. Assessing the consequences of changing childbirth. BMJ 1995, 310: 144.
27. Brennan P F, Casper G R. Modelling for decision support. In: Ball M J, Hannah K J, Newbold S K, Douglas J V (eds.) Nursing Informatics Where Caring and Technology Meet. New York: Springer-Verlag, 1995.
28. Ruland C, Bolton F P. Integrating patient preferences in nurses' care decisions: clinical research and its implications for nursing informatics. In: Nursing Informatics '97 Conference, Post-Conference Meeting. Stockholm, Sweden, 2-4 October 1997.
29. Rosch E. Principles of categorisation. In: Rosch E, Lloyd B B (eds.) Readings in Cognitive Science. Los Altos, CA: Morgan Kaufman, 1988; 312-322.
30. Rolfe G. Science, abduction and the fuzzy nurse: an exploration of expertise. Journal of Advanced Nursing 1997; 25: 1070-1075.
31. Coiera E. Medical informatics. BMJ 1995; 310: 1381-1387.
32. Renaud-Salis J L. Distributed clinical management-information systems: an enabling technology for future health programmes. In: Barahona P, Christiansen J P (eds.) Knowledge and Decisions in Health Telematics - the Next Decade. Amsterdam: IOS Press, 1994: 139-146.
33. Field M J, Lohr K N. In: Institute of Medicine Guidelines for Clinical Practice: From Development to Use. Washington, DC: National Academy Press, 1992.
34. Cohen S J, Weinberger M, Hui S L, Tierney W M, McDonald C J. The impact of reading on physician's adherence to recommended standards of care. Social Science and Medicine 1985; 21: 909-914.
35. Davis D A, Thompson M A, Oxman A D, Haynes R B. Evidence for the effectiveness of CME: a review of 50 randomised controlled trials. JAMA 1992; 268:1111-1117.
36. Putnam R W, Curry L. Impact of physician care appraisal on physician behaviour in the office setting. Canadian Medical Association Journal 1985; 132: 1025-1029.
37. Grol R. Implementing guidelines in general practice care. Quality in Health Care 1992; 1: 184-191.
38. Lomas J, Haynes B. A taxonomy and critical review of tested strategies for the application of clinical recommendations: from 'official' to 'individual' clinical policy. American Journal of Preventive Medicine 1988; 4: 77-94.
39. Grimshaw J, Russell I. Achieving health gain through clinical guidelines II: Ensuring guidelines change medical practice. Quality in Health Care 1994; 3: 42-52.
40. Oxman A D, Thomson M A, Davis D A, Haynes R B. No magic bullets: A systematic review of 102 trials of interventions to improve professional practice. Canadian Medical Association Journal 1995; 153: 1423-1431.
41. Greer A L. The state of the art versus the state of science: the diffusion of new medical technologies into practice. International Journal of Technological Assessment in Health Care 1993; 4: 5-26.
42. McNicol M, Layton A J, Morgan G. Team working: The key to implementing guidelines (editorial). Quality in Health Care 1993;2: 215-216.
43. Haynes R B. Some problems in applying evidence in clinical practice. Annals of New York Academy of Sciences 1993; 703: 210-225.
44. Berwick D M, Coltin K L. Feedback reduces test use in a health maintenance organisation. JAMA 1986; 255: 1450-1454.
45. Harvey G. Nursing quality: An Evaluation of Key Factors in the Implementation Process. PhD thesis: South Bank University, London, 1993.
46. Kitson A, Harvey G, Hyndman S, Sindhu F, Yerrell P. The Impact of a Nursing Quality Assurance Approach, the Dynamic Standard Setting System (DySSSy) on Nursing Practice and Patient Outcomes (the ODySSSy Project). Oxford: National Institute for Nursing, 1994.
47. Klein D. Some notes on the dynamics of resistance to change: the defender role. In: Bennis W G, Benne K D, Chin R, Corey K E (eds.) The Planning of Change. New York: Holt, Reinhart & Winston, 3rd edn, 1976: 117-124.
48. Delamothe T. Wanted: Guidelines that doctors will follow. BMJ 1993; 307: 218.
49. Donabedian A. Evaluating the quality of medical care. Millbank Quarterly 1966;44: 166-206.
50. Royal College of Nursing Standards of Care Project. A Framework for Quality. London: Scutari RCN Standards of Care Series, 1989.
51. Dick R S, Steen E B. The Computer-Based Patient Record: An Essential Technology for Health Care. Washington DC: National Academy Press, 1994.
52. Fitzpatrick R, White D. Public participation in the evaluation of health care. Health and Social Care in the Community 1997; 5: 3-10.
53. Avis M, Bond M, Arthur A. Questioning patient satisfaction: an empirical investigation in two outpatient clinics. Social Science and Medicine 1997; 44: 85-92.
54. Brennan P F. 'Patient satisfaction and normative decision theory'. Informatics: the Infrastructure for Quality Assessment and Improvement in Nursing: Proceedings of the Fifth International Nursing Informatics Symposium Post-Conference, Austin Texas, June 24-25. UC California: UC Nursing Press, 1994.
55. Carr R L, Snow C D, Youngson R A J. Design and implementation of an automated questionnaire. In: Gerdin U, Tallberg M, Wainwright P (eds.) Nursing Informatics: The Impact of Nursing Knowledge on Health Care Informatics. Oxford: IOS Press, 1997.
56. McCormick K. Improving nursing documentation to include outcomes of care in computerised information systems. In: Gerdin U, Tallberg M, Wainwright P (eds.) Nursing Informatics: The Impact of Nursing Knowledge on Health Care Informatics. Oxford: IOS Press, 1997.
57. SPSSinc Statistical Package for Social Sciences 1898-1995.
58. Software and Qualitative Solutions and Research Pty Ltd, Melbourne Australia, 1985-1994, NUDIST.