The effect of pitch span on intonational plateaux

Journal of the International Phonetic Association

Volumn 36, Issue 1, 2006, Pages 21-38

  Knight, Rachael Anne ^a   Nolan, Francis ^b  

^a CITY UNIVERSITY   (United Kingdom)

^b UNIVERSITY OF CAMBRIDGE   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 33646817041     PISSN: 00251003     EISSN: 14753502     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1017/S0025100306002349     Document Type: Article

References (19)

1. Grabe, E. (1998). Pitch accent realization in English and German. Journal of Phonetics 26, 129-143.
2. Grønnum, N. (1991). Prosodic parameters in a variety of regional Danish standard languages, with a view towards Swedish and German. Phonetica 47, 188-214.
3. Hart, J. (1981). Differential sensitivity to pitch distance, particularly in speech. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 69, 811-821.
4. House, D. (1990). Tonal Perception in Speech. Lund: Lund University Press.
5. House, J., Dankovičová, J. & Huckvale, M. (1999). Intonational Modelling in ProSynth: An integrated prosodic approach to speech synthesis. Proceedings XIVth International Congress of Phonetic Sciences 3, 2343-2346.
6. Klatt, D. (1973). Discrimination of fundamental frequency contours in synthetic speech: Implications for models of pitch perception. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 53, 8-15.
7. Knight, R.-A. (2003). Peaks and plateaux: The production and perception of intonational high targets in English. Ph.D. thesis, University of Cambridge.
8. Knight, R.-A. (2004). The realisation of intonational plateaux: Effects of foot structure. In Astruc, L. & Richards, M. (eds.), Cambridge Occasional Papers in Linguistics 1, 157-164.
9. Ladd, D. R. (1996). Intonational Phonology. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
10. Ladd, D. R., Faulkner, D., Faulkner, H. & Schepman, A. (1999). Constant 'segmental anchoring' of F0 movements under changes in speech rate. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 106, 1543-1554.
11. Ladd, D. R. & Morton, R. (1997). The perception of intonational emphasis: Continuous or categorical? Journal of Phonetics 25, 313-342.
12. Nolan, F. (2002). Intonation in speaker identification: An experiment on pitch alignment features. Forensic Linguistics 9, 1-21.
13. Pierrehumbert, J. (1979). The perception of fundamental frequency declination. Journal of the Acoustical Society of America 66, 363-369.
14. Rosen, S. & Fourcin, A. (1986). Frequency selectivity and the perception of speech. In Moore, B. (ed.), Frequency Selectivity in Hearing, 373-488. London: Academic Press.
15. Rossi, M. (1971). Le seuil de glissando ou seuil de perception des variations tonales pour les sons de la parole. Phonetica 23, 1-33.
16. Silverman, K. & Pierrehumbert, J. (1990). The timing of prenuclear high accents in English. In Kingston, J. & Beckman, M. (eds.), Papers in Laboratory Phonology I. Between the Grammar and Physics of Speech, 72-106. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
17. Steele, S. (1986). Nuclear accent F0 peak location: Effects of rate, vowel, and number of following syllables. Journal of the Acoustical Society (Supplement 1) 80, s51.
18. Wichmann, A., House, J. & Rietveld, T. (1999). Discourse constraints on peak timing in English: Experimental evidence. Proceedings of XIVth International Congress of Phonetic Sciences 3, 1765-1768.
19. Xu, Y. (2002). Articulatory constraints and tonal alignment. In Bel, B. & Marlien, I. (eds.), Proceedings of the 1st International Conference on Speech Prosody, Aix-en-Provence, France, 91-100.