Using UML2.0 and GG for describing the dynamic of software architectures

Proceedings - 3rd International Conference on Information Technology and Applications, ICITA 2005

Volumn I, Issue , 2005, Pages 46-51

  Kacem, Mohamed Hadj ^a   Jmaiel, Mohamed ^a   Kacem, Ahmed Hadj ^a   Drira, Khalil ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SFAX   (Tunisia)

^b LAAS CNRS   (France)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMPUTER SIMULATION; COMPUTER SOFTWARE; CONSTRAINT THEORY; GRAPH THEORY; INTEGRATION;

ARCHITECTURAL CONSTRAINTS; COMPONENT-BASED ARCHITECTURES; GRAPH GRAMMARS REWRITING;

COMPUTER PROGRAMMING LANGUAGES;

EID: 33646812897     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1109/ICITA.2005.304     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (16)

1. R. Allen. A Formal Approach to Software Architecture. PhD thesis, School of Computer Science, Carnegie Mellon University, 1997.
2. R. Allen, R. Douence, and D. Garlan. Specifying and analysing dynamic software architectures. Journal of Fundamental Approaches to Software Engineering, 11(6):21-37, September 1998.
3. L. Bellissard, S. B. Atallah, F. Boyer, and M. Riveill. Component-based programming and application management with Olan. In Proceedings of Workshop on Distributed Computing Systems, pages 579-595, Mai 1996.
4. M. Bjorkander and C. Kobryn. Architecting systems with UML 2.0. IEEE SOFTWARE, pages 57-62, August 2003.
5. J. Dulay, N. Kramer, and J. Magee. Structuring parallel and distributed programs. IEEE Software Engineering Journal, 8(2):73-82, Mars 1993.
6. 'eme tirage edition, 2004.
7. H. Gottler. Attributed graph grammars for graphics, graph grammars and their application, computer science, 153:130-142, 1982.
8. H. Gottler. Diagram editors = graphs + attributes + graph grammars. International Journal of Man-Machine Studies (IJMMS), 37:481-502, 1992.
9. M. HadjKacem, M. Jmaiel, A. HadjKacem, and K. Drira. Evaluation and comparison of ADL based approaches for the description of dynamic of software architectures. In Proceedings of the Seventh International Conference on Enterprise Information Systems, Miami. USA, May 2005. INSTICC Press.
10. S. M. Kaplan, J. P. Loyall, and S. K. Goering. Specifying concurrent languages and systems with δ grammars. Research Directions in Concurrent Object-Oriented Programming., 1993.
11. I. Loulou, A. HadjKacem. M. Jmaiel, and K. Drira. Approche intégrée pour la spécification des architectures dynamiques orientées composants. In Proceedings of the Eighth Maghrebian Conference on Software Engineering and Artificial Intelligence, MCSEAI'04. pages 125-136. Mai 2004.
12. N. Medvidovic and R. Taylor. A classification and comparison framework for software architecture description languages. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering, 26(1):70-93. Janvier 2000.
13. D. L. Metayer. Describing software architecture styles using graph grammars. IEEE Transactions on Software Engineering.
14. OMG. The unified modelling language 2.0 - object constraint language 2.0 proposal. Technical report.
15. OMG. UML 2.0 superstructure specification, final adopted specification. Omg document. August 2003.
16. M. Wermelinger. Specification of software architecture reconfiguration. Phd thesis. Université Nova de Lisbon, Juin 1999.