In vitro evaluation of acidified toothpastes with low fluoride content

Caries Research

Volumn 40, Issue 3, 2006, Pages 239-244

  Brighenti, F L ^a   Delbem, A C B ^a   Buzalaf, M A R ^b   Oliveira, F A L ^a   Ribeiro, D B ^a   Sassaki, K T ^a  

^a SÃO PAULO STATE UNIVERSITY UNESP   (Brazil)

^b UNIVERSITY OF SÃO PAULO   (Brazil)

Author keywords

Demineralization; Dental caries, prevention and control; Dental enamel; Fluoride; Toothpaste

Indexed keywords

ANTICARIES AGENT; FLUORIDE; TOOTHPASTE;

ANIMAL; ARTICLE; CATTLE; CHEMISTRY; COMPARATIVE STUDY; DRUG EFFECT; ENAMEL; HARDNESS; NONPARAMETRIC TEST; PH; SURFACE PROPERTY; TOOTH DISEASE;

ANIMALS; CARIOSTATIC AGENTS; CATTLE; DENTAL ENAMEL; FLUORIDES; HARDNESS; HYDROGEN-ION CONCENTRATION; STATISTICS, NONPARAMETRIC; SURFACE PROPERTIES; TOOTH DEMINERALIZATION; TOOTHPASTE;

EID: 33646808646     PISSN: 00086568     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1159/000092232     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Ammari AB, Bloch-Zupan A, Ashley PF: Systematic review of studies comparing the anti-caries efficacy of children's toothpaste containing 600 ppm of fluoride or less with high fluoride toothpastes of 1,000 ppm or above. Caries Res 2003;37:85-92.
2. Arends J, ten Bosch JJ: Demineralization and remineralization evaluation techniques. J Dent Res 1992;71:924-928.
3. Brudevold F, Chilton NW: Comparative study of a fluoride dentifrice containing soluble phosphates and a calcium-free abrasive: second-ear report. J Am Dent Assoc 1966;72:889-894.
4. Campos GM: GMC 2002 (computer program). Ribeirão Preto, Faculdade de Odontologia. www. forp.usp.br/restauradora/gmc/gmc.html#gmc, 2003.
5. Cochran JA, Ketley CE, Duckworth RM, Van Loveren C, Holbrook WP, Seppa L, et al: Development of a standardized method for comparing fluoride ingested from toothpaste by 1.5-3.5-year-old children in seven European countries. Part 2: Ingestion results. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol 2004;32:47-53.
6. Cruz R, Ogaard B, Rølla G: Acquisition of alkali-soluble fluoride by enamel through treatment with NaF-containing toothpastes in vitro. Scand J Dent Res 1992;100:81-87.
7. De Kloet HJ, Exterkate RAM, Rempt HE, ten Cate JM: In vivo bovine enamel remineralization and fluoride uptake from two dentifrices containing different fluoride concentrations. J Dent Res 1986;65:1410-1414.
8. Delbem ACB, Vieira AEM, Cury JA: Avaliação do potencial cariostático do dentifrício brasileiro de maior participação no mercado. Rev Bras Odontol 2002;59:14-18.
9. Featherstone JDB, ten Cate JM, Shariati M, Arends J: Comparison of artificial caries-like lesions by quantitative microradiography and microhardness profiles. Caries Res 1983;17:385-391.
10. Fiske CH, Subbarow Y: The colorimetric determination of phosphorus. J Biol Chem 1925;66:375-400.
11. Hamilton J: New CDC report offers fluoride use tips. J Calif Dent Assoc 2001;29:723-724.
12. Horowitz HS: The need for toothpastes with lower than conventional fluoride concentrations for preschool-aged children. J Public Health Dent 1992;52:216-221.
13. Mascarenhas AK: Risk factors for dental fluorosis: a review of the recent literature. Pediatr Dent 2000;22:269-277.
14. Negri HMD, Cury JA: Dose-response effect of a dentifrice formulation with low fluoride concentration: An in vitro study. Pesq Odontol Bras 2002;16:361-365.
15. Ogaard B, Rølla G, Arends J: In vivo progress of enamel and root surface lesions under plaque as a function of time. Caries Res 1988;22:302-305.
16. Oulis C, Raadal M, Martens L: Guidelines on the use of fluoride in children: an EAPD policy document. Eur J Paediatr Dent 2000;1:7-12.
17. Pessan JP, Silva SMB, Buzalaf MAR: Evaluation of the total fluoride intake of 4-7-year-old children from diet and dentifrice. J Appl Oral Sci 2003;11:150-156.
18. Peterson LG, Lodding A, Kakeberg M, Hoch G: Fluorine profiles in human enamel after in vitro treatment with dentifrices of different compositions and acidities. Swed Dent J 1989;13:177-183.
19. Proskin HM, Kingman A, Naleway C, Woznaik WT: Comparative attributes for the description of the relative efficacy of therapeutic agents: general concepts and definitions, and application to the American Dental Association guidelines for the comparison of the clinical anticaries efficacy of fluoride dentifrices. J Clin Dent 1995;6:176-184.
20. Saxegaard E, Rølla G: Fluoride acquisition on and in human enamel during topical application in vitro. Scand J Dent Res 1988;96:523-535.
21. Slack GL, Bulman JS, Osborn JF: Clinical testing of fluoride and non-fluoride containing dentifrices in Hounslow school children. Br Dent J 1971;130:154-158.
22. ten Cate JM, Mundorff-Shrestha SA: Working group report 1: laboratory models for caries (in vitro and animal models). Adv Dent Res 1995;9:332-334.
23. Vieira AEM, Delbem ACB, Sassaki KT, Rodrigues E, Cury J, Cunha RF: Fluoride dose response in pH-cycling models using bovine enamel. Caries Res 2005;39:514-520.
24. White DJ: The application of in vitro models to research on demineralization and remineralization of the teeth. Adv Dent Res 1995;9:175-193.
25. White DJ, Featherstone JDB: A longitudinal microhardness analysis of fluoride dentifrice effects on lesion progression in vitro. Caries Res 1987;21:502-512.