FLSA: Extending Latent Semantic Analysis with features for dialogue act classification

Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics

Volumn , Issue , 2004, Pages 692-699

  Serafin, Riccardo ^a   Di Eugenio, Barbara ^b  

^a CEFRIEL   (Italy)

^b University of Illinois   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

COMPUTATIONAL LINGUISTICS; SEMANTICS;

DIALOG ACTS; LATENT SEMANTIC ANALYSIS; LINGUISTIC FEATURES; TUTORING DIALOGUES;

CLASSIFICATION (OF INFORMATION);

EID: 33646806408     PISSN: 0736587X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (21)

1. Avrim Blum and Tom Mitchell. 1998. Combining labeled and unlabeled data with co-training. In COLT98, Proceedings of the Conference on Computational Learning Theory.
2. Jean Carletta, Amy Isard, Stephen Isard, Jacqueline C. Kowtko, Gwyneth Doherty-Sneddon, and Anne H. Anderson. 1997. The reliability of a dialogue structure coding scheme. Computational Lingustics, 23(1):13–31.
3. Jean Carletta. 1996. Assessing agreement on classification tasks: the Kappa statistic. Computational Linguistics, 22(2):249–254.
4. Peter W. Foltz, Walter Kintsch, and Thomas K. Landauer. 1998. The measurement of textual coherence with Latent Semantic Analysis. Discourse Processes, 25:285–308.
5. Peter W. Foltz, Darrell Laham, and Thomas K. Landauer. 1999. The intelligent essay assessor: Applications to educational technology. Interactive Multimedia Electronic Journal of Computer-Enhanced Learning, 1(2).
6. Michael Glass and Barbara Di Eugenio. 2002. MUP: The UIC standoff markup tool. In The Third SigDIAL Workshop on Discourse and Dialogue, Philadelphia, PA, July.
7. Michael Glass, Heena Raval, Barbara Di Eugenio, and Maarika Traat. 2002. The DIAG-NLP dialogues: coding manual. Technical Report UICCS 02-03, University of Illinois - Chicago.
8. Dharmendra Kanejiya, Arun Kumar, and Surendra Prasad. 2003. Automatic Evaluation of Students’ Answers using Syntactically Enhanced LSA. In HLT-NAACL Workshop on Building Educational Applications using Natural Language Processing, pages 53–60, Edmonton, Canada.
9. Walter Kintsch. 2001. Predication. Cognitive Science, 25:173–202.
10. Klaus Krippendorff. 1980. Content Analysis: an Introduction to its Methodology. Sage Publications, Beverly Hills, CA.
11. T. Lager and N. Zinovjeva. 1999. Training a dialogue act tagger with the µ-TBL system. In The Third Swedish Symposium on Multimodal Communication, Linköping University Natural Language Processing Laboratory (NLPLAB).
12. Thomas K. Landauer and S.T. Dumais. 1997. A solution to Plato’s problem: The latent semantic analysis theory of acquisition, induction, and representation of knowledge. Psychological Review, 104:211–240.
13. Lori Levin, Ann Thymé-Gobbel, Alon Lavie, Klaus Ries, and Klaus Zechner. 1998. A discourse coding scheme for conversational Spanish. In Proceedings ICSLP.
14. J. Ross Quinlan. 1993. C4.5: Programs for Machine Learning. Morgan Kaufmann.
15. Klaus Ries. 1999. HMM and Neural Network Based Speech Act Detection. In Proceedings of ICASSP 99, Phoenix, Arizona, March.
16. Ken Samuel, Sandra Carberry, and K. Vijay-Shanker. 1998. Dialogue act tagging with transformation-based learning. In ACL/COLING 98, Proceedings of the 36th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (joint with the 17th International Conference on Computational Linguistics), pages 1150–1156.
17. John R. Searle. 1975. Indirect Speech Acts. In P. Cole and J.L. Morgan, editors, Syntax and Semantics 3. Speech Acts. Academic Press. Reprinted in Pragmatics. A Reader, Steven Davis editor, Oxford University Press, 1991.
18. Riccardo Serafin. 2003. Feature Latent Semantic Analysis for dialogue act interpretation. Master’s thesis, University of Illinois - Chicago.
19. A. Stolcke, K. Ries, N. Coccaro, E. Shriberg, R. Bates, D. Jurafsky, P. Taylor, R. Martin, C. Van Ess-Dykema, and M. Meteer. 2000. Dialogue act modeling for automatic tagging and recognition of conversational speech. Computational Linguistics, 26(3):339–373.
20. Douglas M. Towne. 1997. Approximate reasoning techniques for intelligent diagnostic instruction. International Journal of Artificial Intelligence in Education.
21. Peter Wiemer-Hastings. 2001. Rules for syntax, vectors for semantics. In CogSci01, Proceedings of the Twenty-Third Annual Meeting of the Cognitive Science Society, Edinburgh, Scotland.