Eye measurements in 7-year-old black South African children

Annals of Human Biology

Volumn 33, Issue 2, 2006, Pages 241-254

  Douglas, Tania S ^a   Viljoen, Denis L ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CAPE TOWN   (South Africa)

^b UNIVERSITY OF THE WITWATERSRAND   (South Africa)

Author keywords

Anthropometry; Fetal alcohol syndrome; Photogrammetry; Population norms

Indexed keywords

ETHICS; EYE; PHENOTYPE;

ANTHROPOMETRY; ARTICLE; CHILD; ETHNOLOGY; EYE; FEMALE; HISTOLOGY; HUMAN; MALE; METHODOLOGY; NEGRO; PHENOTYPE; PHOTOGRAPHY; SOUTH AFRICA;

AFRICAN CONTINENTAL ANCESTRY GROUP; ANTHROPOMETRY; CHILD; EYE; FEMALE; HUMANS; MALE; PHENOTYPE; PHOTOGRAMMETRY; SOUTH AFRICA;

AFRICA; SOUTH AFRICA; SOUTHERN AFRICA; SUB-SAHARAN AFRICA;

EID: 33646800496     PISSN: 03014460     EISSN: 14645033     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/03014460600619161     Document Type: Article

References (43)

1. Abdel-Aziz YI, Karara HM. 1971. Direct linear transformation from comparator coordinates into object space coordinates. American Society of Photogrammetry Symposium on Close-Range Photogrammetry. Virginia: Falls Church. pp 1-18.
2. Allanson JE, Ohara P, Farkas LG, Nair RC. 1993. Anthropometric craniofacial pattern profiles in Down-syndrome. Am J Med Genet 47:748-752.
3. Astley SJ, Clarren SK. 1995. A fetal alcohol syndrome screening tool. Alcohol Clin Exp Res 19:1565-1571.
4. Astley SJ, Clarren SK. 1996. A case definition and photographic screening tool for the facial phenotype of fetal alcohol syndrome. J Pediatr 129:33-41.
5. Butler MG, Allen GA, Haynes JL, Singh DN, Watson MS, Breg WR. 1991. Anthropometric comparison of mentally retarded males with and without the Fragile X syndrome. Am J Med Genet 38:260-268.
6. Douglas TS. 2004. Image processing for craniofacial landmark identification and measurement: A review of photogrammetry and cephalometry. Comput Med Imaging Graph 28:401-409.
7. Douglas TS, Martinez F, Meintjes EM, Vaughan CL, Viljoen DL. 2003a. Eye feature extraction for diagnosing the facial phenotype associated with fetal alcohol syndrome. Med Biol Eng Comput 41:101-106.
8. Douglas TS, Meintjes EM, Vaughan CL, Viljoen DL. 2003b. Role of depth in eye distance measurements: Comparison of single and stereo-photogrammetry. Am J Hum Biol 15:573-578.
9. Evereklioglu C, Doganay S, Er H, Gunduz A, Tercan M, Balat A, Cumurcu T. 2002. Craniofacial anthropometry in a Turkish population. Cleft Palate Craniofac J 39:208-218.
10. Farkas LG. 1994. Photogrammetry of the face. In: Farkas LG, editor. Anthropometry of the head and face. New York: Raven. pp 79-88.
11. Farkas LG, Hreczko TA, Katic MJ. 1994. Craniofacial norms in north American Caucasians from birth (one year) to adulthood. In: Farkas LG, editor. Anthropometry of the head and face. New York: Raven. pp 241-249.
12. Fledelius HC, Stubgaard M. 1986. Changes in eye position during growth and adult life. Acta Ophthalmol 64:481-486.
13. Fleiss JL. 1986. The design and analysis of clinical experiments. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
14. Fuchs M, Iosub S, Bingol N, Gromisch MD. 1980. Palpebral fissure size revisited. J Pediatr 96:77-78.
15. Gupta VP, Sodhi PK, Pandey RM. 2003. Normal values for interinnercanthal distance, interpupillary distance, and interoutercanthal distance in the Indian population. Int J Clin Pract 57:25-29.
16. Guyot L, Dubuc M, Richard O, Philip N, Dutour O. 2003. Comparison between direct clinical and digital photogrammetric measurements in patients with 22q11 microdeletion. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg 32:246-252.
17. Hall JG, Froster-Iskenius UG, Allanson JE. 1989. Handbook of normal physical measurements. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
18. Iosub S, Fuchs M, Bingol N, Stone RK, Gromisch MD, Wasserman E. 1985. Palpebral fissure length in black and Hispanic children: Correlation with head circumference. Pediatrics 75:318-320.
19. Jamison PL, Ward RE. 1993. Measurement size, precision and reliability in craniofacial anthropometry: Bigger is better. Am J Phys Anthropol 90:495-500.
20. Juberg RC, Sholte FG, Touchstone WJ. 1975. Normal values for intercanthal distances of 5- to 11-year-old American blacks. Pediatrics 55:431-436.
21. Kaimbo DK, Kayembe D. 1994. Outer orbital distance, inner canthal distance and interpupillary distance, proptosis in Zairian children. J Français d'Ophtalmologie 17:496-500.
22. Kuczmarski RJ, Ogden CL, Grummer-Strawn LM, Flegal KM, Mei Z, Wei R, Curtin LR, Roche AF, Johnson CL. 2000. 2000 CDC Growth Charts for the United States: Methods and development. National Center for Health Statistics, Advance Data from Vital and Health Statistics 314:1-27.
23. Laestadius ND, Aase JM, Smith DW. 1969. Normal inner canthal and outer orbital dimensions. J Pediatr 74:465-468.
24. Lucas WP, Pryor HB. 1935. Range and standard deviations of certain physical measurements in healthy children. J Pediatr 6:533-545.
25. MacLachlan C, Howland HC. 2002. Normal values and standard deviations for pupil diameter and interpupillary distance in subjects aged 1 month to 19 years. Ophthalmic Physiol Optics 22:175-182.
26. Malina RM, Hamill PVV, Lemeshow S. 1973. Selected Body Measurements of Children 6-11 years, United States. Vital and Health Statistics, Series 11, No. 123, Washington, DC.
27. May PA, Brooke L, Gossage JP, Croxford J, Adnams C, Jones KL, Robinson L, Viljoen D. 2000. Epidemiology of fetal alcohol syndrome in a South African community in the Western Cape Province. Am J Public Health 90:1905-1912.
28. Meintjes EM, Douglas TS, Martinez F, Vaughan CL, Adams LP, Stekhoven A, Viljoen D. 2002. A stereo-photogrammetric method to measure the facial dysmorphology of children in the diagnosis of fetal alcohol syndrome. Med Eng Phys 24:683-689.
29. Moore ES, Ward RE, Jamison PL, Morris CA, Bader PI, Hall BD. 2001. The subtle facial signs of prenatal exposure to alcohol: An anthropometric approach. J Pediatr 139:215-219.
30. Moore ES, Ward RE, Jamison PL, Morris CA, Bader PI, Hall BD. 2002. New perspectives on the face in fetal alcohol syndrome: What anthropometry tells us. Am J Med Genet 109:249-260.
31. Okanlawon AO, Ejiwunmi AB, Rosanwo MO, Ojo OO. 1990. Standards of craniofacial dimension for an African population. East Afr Med J 67:254-259.
32. Osuobeni EP, Almusa KA. 1993. Gender differences in interpupillary distance among Arabs. Optom Vis Sci 70:1027-1030.
33. Pivnick EK, Rivas ML, Tolley EA, Smith SD, Presbury GJ. 1999. Interpupillary distance in a normal black population. Clin Genet 55:182-191.
34. Pryor HB. 1969. Objective measurement of interpupillary distance. Pediatrics 44:973-977.
35. Shaner DJ, Bamforth JS, Petersen AE, Beattie OB. 1998a. Facial measurements in clinical genetics: How important are the instruments we use? Am J Med Genet 77:384-390.
36. Shaner DJ, Peterson AE, Beattie OB, Bamforth JS. 1998b. Different techniques, different results - A comparison of photogrammetric and caliper-derived measurements. Am J Phys Anthropol 106:547-552.
37. Singh JR, Banerjee S. 1983. Normal values for interpupillary, inner canthal and outer canthal distances in an Indian population. Hum Hered 33:326-328.
38. Sokal RR, Rohlf FJ. 1969. Biometry. San Francisco: WH Freeman.
39. Strömland K, Chen YH, Norberg T, Wennerstrom K, Michael G. 1999. Reference values of facial features in Scandinavian children measured with a range-camera technique. Scand J Plastic Reconstr Surg Hand Surg 33:59-65.
40. Thomas IT, Gaitantzis YA, Frias JL. 1987. Palpebral fissure length from 29 weeks gestation to 14 years. J Pediatr 111:267-268.
41. Thomas IT, Hintz RJ, Frias JL. 1989. New methods for quantitative and qualitative facial studies: An overview. J Craniofac Genet Dev Biol 9:107-111.
42. Viljoen D. 1999. Fetal alcohol syndrome. S Afr Med J 89:958-960.
43. Ward RE, Jamison PL. 1991. Measurement precision and reliability in craniofacial anthropometry: Implications and suggestions for clinical applications. J Craniofac Genet Dev Biol 11:156-164.